all 5 comments

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Apparently nukes need to have their radioactive materials renewed every 10 years.

Having seen the upkeep of Russia's military equipment so far, what the likelihood they would have done that properly?

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Well, whether or not nuclear weapons are real has become more relevant again. This is a topic that even many among the conspiracy aware don't delve into. Photographic evidence appears to be tampered with, which suggests that it's yet another psy-op. I lean toward that stance myself. It fits within a pattern of threats being (partially) faked to instill the masses with fear. Both the pictures of Hiroshima and Nagasaki after the bombing, and the eyewitness testimony, are consistent with a regular carpet bombing. This is the 10th anniversary of the archiving of a forum dedicated to this quest. A treasure trove of information.

/u/JasonCarswell /u/Horrux I think this is of interest to you.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, the topic interests me. However, I have come to deem it irrelevant, because nukes themselves, IMHO, are.

Let me explain: my view is that they are real but that cosmic laws don't permit large-scale mass-extermination of sentient beings by any use, especially with such weapons. This is why a "voluntary" injection has been devised, it's a way around that "aggressive extermination of masses of sentient being" clause of cosmic laws: people are coerced, but ultimately AGREE to take these jabs. That's "voluntary" self-extermination.

This is the reason why UFOs have been sighted at every nuclear test ever. They're watching and they'll intervene if you want to use them on people. That would also explain the radioactivity of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Bombs were dropped, never blew up, firebombing was used instead, and the radioactivity makes the perfect cover.

Now you may have noticed that there is talk about Russia possibly launching a massive cyberattack that would take out the world's power grids. Or nukes! In fact, the SUN is about to emit a Carrington-event-level super-flare and EMP that will achieve this. Then it could be claimed it was a nuke or a cyberattack "it's the Russians!"... A nuke works well because then you can tell people the land has become radioactive and you can corral what's left of mankind into underground bunkers and have the surface all to themselves (the "elite" scum). And have their boot-that-stomps-on-a-human-face-FOREVER fun.

One way or another, nukes are perfect fearmongering. Except I don't believe they will ever be used in any kind of extermination event. Sure, nukes have been used in recent years in ammo depots and such, but never on population centers. You would have a very hard time explaining how this isn't an actual nuclear device: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjAJh7oXtiY

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know enough physics to judge whether or not that's a nuclear weapon. People in the comments give various reasons why it shouldn't be, such as that the EMP blast would've destroyed any recording device.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I do. It is undeniably nuclear.