you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

On the one hand this person does not seem concerned enough for it to be a nuke. But it's possible that they just don't know what it is.

It's very small for a nuke, but tactical nukes are a thing. Anyone have any insight on how to get credible info on this?

[–]AlanSmith33 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Supposedly tactical nukes were used by Saudi Arabia back in 2015, it's not the Davy Crocket nuclear bazookas of the 50's, we're talking low radiation, high yield explosives that leaves little trace radiation compared to the ballistic nukes. Yet there's not interference on the camera, regardless if it's film or digital.

My view is inconclusive, if it's CGI they're using a lot of high quality effects for light scattering, not something I'd expect for a private hoax and the motion tracking for overlays is basically PERFECT.

I'm absolutely sure people could use tactical nukes and keep it "unverifiable".