you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

When they think they can only depend on themselves, they become ruthless and power-hungry, allowing the ruling groups get past everyone's radars.

So people get redpilled and then do nothing? This argument makes no sense.

"Authority figures" develop organically, based upon the value that they provide. "Creating authority" is statism and is anti free market aka anti free will.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

I'm an authoritarian. People are too much of a danger to themselves. The NWO is 90% capitalist.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

Haven't you had enough authoritarians in your life? Pure free market capitalism would never dick your people out of bread. Because I would bake you a loaf myself for $10.

[–]Antarchomachus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I have had enough of authoritarians, but skeptical that free market capitalism can protect me from them

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

You're right, capitalism can't protect you from shit. Holding the decentralized constitutional republic system accountable or utilizing a parallel system is the only way out.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Holding the decentralized constitutional republic [top-down] system accountable or utilizing a parallel [bottom-up] system is the only way out.

^ THIS !

The first part is exceptionally unlikely. The latter is happening, but won't survive or last without a lot of work. It will always happen, and this alt-system resistance will always try to be reborn and will always fail without proper circumstances. IMO, it seems we couldn't have a better chance than at this moment. Bitcoin, torrent, great awakening, and the ruling class over playing their hand with The Big COVID Lie, etc. The time has never been better. But they've also never had so much centralized monopolized power.

" [Insert elusive Jefferson quote perpetual state of revolution] " (Maybe I'm misremembering.)

Trying times are times for trying.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Trying times are times for trying.

fuck yeah

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

The whole free market doesn't allow authoritarians is a Nirvana fallacy. You are always going to have a group of people in power forcing their authority over others.

Modern communist regimes are actually Super-Darwinian-Capitalist systems. It's not important to just have capable people in power, but to defend the meritocracy. To me ethics should also be part of the meritocracy. The ethics of a politician are just as important when it comes to judging if he should rule or not as his own skills.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

The trick is to not trust anyone to be ethical. You can't legislate ethical behavior. Although these goddamn lawyers kill a million trees every year trying.

Modern communist regimes are actually Super-Darwinian-Capitalist systems.

I hope this is a hot take, because it sounds literally batshit crazy. Unless you mean real communist* countries, which have failed and turned to anarchy.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Dude, the US, the prime example of capitalism in the world has been waging war on like half the entire world for decades now for things Americans themselves don't really understand. You have the Intelligence groups making fortunes with the drug dealing, the Pharma companies downright killing people left and right, why is it that capitalism isn't allowing people to live in a proper Republic?

Capitalism (from the Social Darwinist movement onwards) was designed to be an imitation of what Plato described as "Oligarchy", the type of government of the rich in which money replaces virtue and people are hopelessly distracted by material goods like to properly regulate government themselves. By manipulating the constitution for their ends, the oligarchs turn into a powerful tyranny.

This is because the Jesuits are a group of Neo-Platonists.

Communism (which the Jesuits also created) is what happens when those flaws I described in the oligarchy get much, much worse.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Dude, the US, the prime example of capitalism

I wish. It's corporatism or corporate socialism or crony capitalism. Or yeah, straight up oligarchy. Your pharma example is good, so are 'too big to fail' corporations.

Capitalism isn't even really a political system, it is the natural state of trading freely with your neighbors. Our constitutional republic is failing for lots of reasons. Yes it is a terror state. CIA running drugs could certainly happen in a communist or capitalist system.

I don't even know what we're arguing, but I disagree with this authoritarian shit being a solution to anything.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

That's fine. I'm just saying authoritarian governments can also work, not that they are the only solution.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I agree, lots of these hardcore nazi types seem to turn authoritarian. I don't say that as a smear, just like, there are other authoritarians.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I disagree with this authoritarian shit being a solution to anything.

Ditto.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

This is because the Jesuits are a group of Neo-Platonists.

Always with this shit. It was actually getting good until you cucked it up, and you discredit yourself.

IFIFY:
This is because the Jesuits, Zionists, and other ruling class secret orders are private groups of Neo-Platonists.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not neccesarily saying they were the only ones who thought this one up, but since I lean towards the idea that the Jesuits are the strongest group I brought up their Neo-Platonic influence.

Also, Ultra Zionists are a group of nationalistic materialists. The Jesuits are the ones who lean towards Platonism, which if you know how to look, you can see that their deranged supernaturalism is present everywhere.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

this [...] sounds literally batshit crazy.

Yes. Without clarification it's an abstract word salad of the absurd.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

The whole free market doesn't allow authoritarians is a Nirvana fallacy.

The abstract ideals that can never be achieved are noble goals non-the-less, and they fundamentally demand balance (non-corrupt, non-extremist, and FOTPACH) and/or chaos (division, want, and war): authoritarianism, free market, socialism, and voluntaryism/anarchy.

I will always prefer freedom to fuck up for myself than to endure getting fucked by others - so I will always aim for voluntaryism while realistically being a minarchist.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's fine, before the coming of the modern capitalist model, the protestant nations dominated culture in Europe and their governments were nationalistic and authoritarian but things worked fine for them.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

When they think they can only depend on themselves, they become ruthless and power-hungry, allowing the ruling groups get past everyone's radars.

This is what is pissing me off about so many Jewish YouTubers becoming so prominent over others? It's not just talent. Some are good but not that much better than their contemporaries. Birth-citizens of that tribe are being artificially promoted, IMO. I suspect many get production help, tips, notes, talking points, and/or financial support by tribal default, and by being limited hangouts they won't ever point out the manufacture chaos and cultural confusion, much less who is to blame - (((the globalist Zionist ruling class))).

For example, some Jewish-Canadian citizens may rail against Trudeau, governments, and corporations, but hypocritically as Jews (Zionists or not) they can never rail against, much less question, their own tribe, culture, leaders, etc. and/or the ruling class - and certainly never entertain any critical analysis or open discussion.

These alt-indie-Jewish media influencers and "leaders of earned trust authority" never peak under the ruling class cult's protective cloak of "anti-Semitism" bullshit, and that is why suspected limited hangouts must have sister litmus testing similar to questioning 9/11.