you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I wonder if it's activist 'science' like we see with Covid where they figure the lie is ultimately good for people. They're nudged to think the 'right' things.

From Wikipedia:

Infants typically receive several vaccinations between the ages of 2 and 4 months, which is also the peak age for SIDS. Due to this coincidence, a number of studies have investigated the possible role of vaccinations as a cause of SIDS. These have found either no relation between vaccinations and SIDS, or a reduction of the risk of SIDS following vaccination.[72][73][74][75][76][77] A 2007 meta-analysis found that vaccinations were associated with a halving of the risk of SIDS, and argued that immunisation should be a part of SIDS prevention campaigns.[75][78]

[–]chadwickofwv 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Also, if you look at the sids rate of all countries and compare that to the number of vaccines on their childhood schedule they correlate almost perfectly. The more vaccines you give them the higher the rate of sids, no exceptions.

[–]iDontShift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the purposeful lies are what the good-hearted people find hard to swallow to the point of rejection -- denial