you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]dingoatemytaco 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Other interpretations:

  • Hunter's laptop was real, but not newsworthy.

  • Trump supporters were partially responsible for the events that led to deaths of 5 people.

  • CIA and other security agencies are well aware of Russian bounty story, which is factual.

  • Trump colluded with Russian government connected businessmen and many other businessmen in other countries. Another fact.

  • 13 men are appropriately suspected of orchestrating a domestic terror plot to kidnap American politician Gretchen Whitmer, which the FBI are investigating.

  • Rittenhouse's approaches included self defense, but were not "pure" self defense

  • The lab-leak theory is now much more plausible as a pandemic origin, though not necessarily the 'most likely' theory.

  • "The shots" are not supposed to "prevent" anything. What vaccines are designed to do is REDUCE transmission by helping people build immunity without getting seriously ill.

[–]zyxzevn[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You are watching too much propaganda fake news.. really.
So I added you to the block list.

[–]dingoatemytaco 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Guess who pays for unwokenarrative.com

Guess why they won't tell you who pays for them or who runs the website.

Consider the motives and purposes of that website

Which narratives do they want you to believe? Their narratives? Why? Can they corrobrate or identify their sources? Why not? Shouldn't there be some form of integrity, and a trail of factual evidence, in the process of questioning all narratives?

I look at Saidit and other websites in order to see potential corroborating evidence, facts, and alternative theories for reports in the news.

Thanks for this list. It led me to unwokenarrative.com, which I hadn't seen.