You obviously have not researched 9/11 in the slightest bit. Whatever happened to the passengers is not my knowing. All we know is that there were plane swaps, on the ground (Flight 77) and in the air. We also know for a fact that ACARs, proves more than anything else, that UA93 and Flight 175 were flying westward well after their passenger jet drones crashed either into the facade of the towers, or as Rumsfeld said, was "shot down" over Shanksville. ACARS data proves without a doubt that the offical narrative is a lie, period.

When Ellen Mariani sued, her lawyer wanted the judge removed from the case due to his conflict of interest, his son’s law firm represented ICTS, the Israeli company that provided security at the airport the planes were hijacked from, among numerous other conflicts of interest. They were attacked as – what else? – “anti-semites.”

https://marianilawsuit.wordpress.com/

Mariani, along with her lawyer Bruce Leichty, were threatened with sanctions “in the form of double costs, for which Mariani and Leichty would be jointly and severally liable” and were condemned for “ad hominem attacks”, “bombastic challenges to the integrity of the district court” and “deeply troubling personal slurs”.

Mariani’s April 19, 2012 brief noted, in part that “Judge Hellerstein and his wife Mildred are known to be active supporters of Israeli causes, and it is implausible that Judge Hellerstein would not at least be on inquiry notice of the affiliations of his son’s law firm and the connections of his son’s clients to Israeli and Israeli-linked defendants in a case before him, particularly in a case of the magnitude of the 911 case.” It continued “It is not plausible that Judge Hellerstein, a highly-educated and connected supporter of Israeli causes, was unaware of the connections of his son’s law firm.”

In fact, Mariani knew that Hellerstein was pressuring everyone to take settlements – basically, take some money and shut up.

“Federal Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein has presided over all of the proceedings arising out of the terrorist acts that beset the United States of America on September 11, 201 1, including but not limited to the crashing of United Airlines Flight 175 into the South Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City, leading to the death of Appellant’s husband Louis Neil Mariani. The effect of Judge Hellerstein’s supervision and rulings has been that no trial has been held on any wrongful death or survivorship claim arising from any of the 9/11 plane crashes… Consistent with pressure exerted by Judge Hellerstein at numerous points, settlements have been sought and approved as to all claims made to date, and Mariani believes that her claim and the claim of her deceased husband’s Estate–settlement of which was fashioned over her objection–are the only 9/11 claims not yet the subject of binding resolution by final nonappealable order.”

Mariani lost one of her own on Flight 175. So we can be sure there were real passengers, it is jsut that ACARS proves that 175 did not hit the towers. As it was pinged flying westward, likely to an undiscolsed miltiary base, as was perfectly written out in Operation Northwoods. But it Northwoods case, they would use fake passengers with Aliases, switch transponder with Passenger jet drone and have mock funerals after the fact.

PICCOcalls also prove that UA93 and 175 were undergoing a live hijackign drill at the time as passengers were able to use their cellphones by plugging the numebr into the airphone. PICCOcalls can only be done via a transponder on the plane and are only utilized for live hijacking drills. So it is likely these passengers were unknowingly part of a live hijacking drill, whether they believed it or not. Whatever the case may be, 175 was hundreds of miles west flying in the opposite direction.