You're ignorant, period. I just gave you three scholarly sources showing you with proof that Jackson appointed the Rothschilds as fiscal agents to the US. And you're too engulfed in some dead myth propagated by blogs and infowars to admit that they and you are wrong.

Again, I gave you the sources and info. You're free to ignore them like an ignoramous or read them. I don't care. Something that is well known, doesn't make it true. That's an argumentum ad populum.

For the longest time, I too believed he fought the Rothschilds but he didn't, he fought one banking house: Barring and Co. Those he appointed were in good standing with Rothschild via personal corespondence and through Rothschild agents and banking houses.

I believe the anti-banking myth of Jackson was a lie, I know it was, as I proved, to bring down one banking house, Barring and Co., for another, the House of Rothschild.

It is clear your biases in favor of some racist, dead, freemasonic slaveholder, who appointed the inbred Rothschilds as fiscal agents to the US, stems from your lack of actually researching primary and scholarly sources.

Is it better we believe the alt. sources, heavily infiltrated and controlled by Mossad and Zionist Jews, who are most likely propagating this myth for their own benefit? No, of course not.

One such poster on here praised Jackson, and on his blog, oddly, he slipped up and praised August Belmont (pseudonym), a Rothschild agent, claiming how much smarter he was then all the gentiles living today. A man of exquisite taste and a hard worker who traveled before the age of 24 to meet Rothschild to work for them and always for them. Hence, the pro-Jackson stance is quite weird, at first, and only if you believe the lies that he hated the Rothschilds but I came to realize it is not weird at all when he appointed Rothschild as fiscal agents to the US.