you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Do you even know what SCIENTISM is?

No. But I know was SCIENCE is.

Actually, you don't. You have blind faith in corrupt science without questioning.

SCIENTISM:

A blind faith dogma in the benevolence of "experts" and corporations making obscene profits from their allegedly safe but very secret and privatized so-called "science".

Authentic science is a transparent discovery and open verification process (not settled) of elimination based on a hypothesis. Since many factors may corrupt this process it must be openly verifiable to eliminate junk science from legitimate results.

You're missing the point: If you don't want commentary, don't post in a public forum.

You're missing the point. If I wanted commentary from the likes of you I'd post and be censored on Reddit. There is an information war on and you're on the wrong side, infiltrating, disrupting, and lying all over SaidIt, where I aim to share valued information and skepticism that are free of authoritarian agendas.

Your bullshit lies about truth being a shill is just dragging down the discussion on the pyramid of debate. As is your MO.

Go fuck yourself with your big pharma depopulation poisons and authoritarian idoloitry.

If you think something is my comment is wrong, present your evidence and argument. If you can't I think we can comfortably conclude that it is you who is lying.

BULLSHIT. You are a nay-saying lying shilling sealion through and through, pretending to be reasonable on a forum where you are not liked. You don't accept counter-narratives because you're dense and/or a shill. Go suck someone else's time and try not to choke.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You have blind faith in corrupt science without questioning.

Not at all. I look at the data if I can. I look at the citations. I consider the target audience. I consider the conflicts of interest.

The difference is that by "questioning", here you mean watching conspiracy theory videos on the internet.

Authentic science is a transparent discovery and open verification process (not settled) of elimination based on a hypothesis.

Yeah, you remember that tranparency and open verification thing next time you're queried about one of your "facts" and respond with the Glavset-recommended "STOP SEALIONING AT ME. I DON'T DEAL WELL WITH TRANSPARENCY OR VERIFICATION".

You don't accept counter-narratives because you're dense and/or a shill.

You don't supply counter-narratives. You just shill Glavset lies.