Unvaxxed Child Less Risk Of Serious COVID Than Vaxxed 70 Year Old (13:48) ~ The Jimmy Dore Show [From 9m+ is noteworthy about the GreenPass social credit system.]

submitted by JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SaidOverRed 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

So I'm no Alex Jones tinfoil-hatter but if the mass vaccination of risky, experimental new methods are not in fact a long term plan for mass sterilization ... then why the push to get society used to forcing it on children? Children get over the disease normally and are practically invulnerable to its effects. There's been what, a 100/1000000000 deaths from covid that are from otherwise healthy children? Why get society comfortable with said experimentation for something that's not crippling (like polio)?

And don't say to dry up the reservoir so old people can't catch it afterward. You don't risk the young to protect the old. That's not moral.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

So I'm no Alex Jones tinfoil-hatter

Me neither

but if the mass vaccination of risky, experimental new methods

It's not that risky, nor that experimental

are not in fact a long term plan for mass sterilization

What? How do you get from elderly are at increased risk from COVID to the extent that an unvaccinated child is at lest risk of serious covid than a vaccinated 70 year old to "long term plan for sterilization.

And where did they inject your vaccine? Mine was just in the arm.

then why the push to get society used to forcing it on children?

So that they don't get the infection, and spread it to their grandparents. Or parents.

There's been what, a 100/1000000000 deaths from covid that are from otherwise healthy children?

A couple or few deaths per million children in the population .... I don't know what that would be in terms of case/mortality. And about half the deaths in children that aren't otherwise healthy.

Why get society comfortable with said experimentation for something that's not crippling (like polio)?

A couple of weeks in ICU is moderately crippling for an extended period of time in most patients.

And don't say to dry up the reservoir so old people can't catch it afterward. You don't risk the young to protect the old. That's not moral.

It depends on how much risk. Raising orphans is expensive.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Inauthentic big pharma shill sealioning.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

They're just truths. If they make you experience cognitive dissonance, consider your beliefs, don't strike out at the source of information.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

You are not the source and your information is from proven MSM liars.

You are just their enslaved brainwashed and pathetic propaganda delivery and authoritarian defense mechanism.

If you could think for yourself you'd see the same people behind all the wars ever are behind this one and you're on the wrong side.

But you've heard this, you know this, and you still choose to shill for evil.

Don't comment on my posts, and also, go fuck yourself dangerously - or smarten up and quit shilling lies.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

You are not the source and your information is from proven MSM liars.

Nope. Scientific sources.

But you've heard this, you know this, and you still choose to shill for evil.

Telling truths isn't evil, Jason. And neither is it sealioning.

Don't comment on my posts, and also, go fuck yourself dangerously - or smarten up and quit shilling lies.

Don't post lies in a public forum then. They will be called out.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Do you even know what SCIENTISM is?

Don't post lies in a public forum then. They will be called out.

Ironic coming from the second biggest liar shills on here. Try hard enough and you might even beat socks.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Do you even know what SCIENTISM is?

No. But I know was SCIENCE is.

Ironic coming from the second biggest liar shills on here.

You're missing the point: If you don't want commentary, don't post in a public forum.

Your bullshit lies about truth being a shill is just dragging down the discussion on the pyramid of debate. As is your MO.

If you think something is my comment is wrong, present your evidence and argument. If you can't I think we can comfortably conclude that it is you who is lying.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Do you even know what SCIENTISM is?

No. But I know was SCIENCE is.

Actually, you don't. You have blind faith in corrupt science without questioning.

SCIENTISM:

A blind faith dogma in the benevolence of "experts" and corporations making obscene profits from their allegedly safe but very secret and privatized so-called "science".

Authentic science is a transparent discovery and open verification process (not settled) of elimination based on a hypothesis. Since many factors may corrupt this process it must be openly verifiable to eliminate junk science from legitimate results.

You're missing the point: If you don't want commentary, don't post in a public forum.

You're missing the point. If I wanted commentary from the likes of you I'd post and be censored on Reddit. There is an information war on and you're on the wrong side, infiltrating, disrupting, and lying all over SaidIt, where I aim to share valued information and skepticism that are free of authoritarian agendas.

Your bullshit lies about truth being a shill is just dragging down the discussion on the pyramid of debate. As is your MO.

Go fuck yourself with your big pharma depopulation poisons and authoritarian idoloitry.

If you think something is my comment is wrong, present your evidence and argument. If you can't I think we can comfortably conclude that it is you who is lying.

BULLSHIT. You are a nay-saying lying shilling sealion through and through, pretending to be reasonable on a forum where you are not liked. You don't accept counter-narratives because you're dense and/or a shill. Go suck someone else's time and try not to choke.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You have blind faith in corrupt science without questioning.

Not at all. I look at the data if I can. I look at the citations. I consider the target audience. I consider the conflicts of interest.

The difference is that by "questioning", here you mean watching conspiracy theory videos on the internet.

Authentic science is a transparent discovery and open verification process (not settled) of elimination based on a hypothesis.

Yeah, you remember that tranparency and open verification thing next time you're queried about one of your "facts" and respond with the Glavset-recommended "STOP SEALIONING AT ME. I DON'T DEAL WELL WITH TRANSPARENCY OR VERIFICATION".

You don't accept counter-narratives because you're dense and/or a shill.

You don't supply counter-narratives. You just shill Glavset lies.