you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

We know the propaganda.

Do you know the counter-propaganda?

[–]package 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The propaganda of... basic physics? I'm not arguing about the motivations of the attack or who was behind it, just that there's nothing remarkable or out of the ordinary about how it fell.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

just that there's nothing remarkable or out of the ordinary about how it fell.

Because it happens all the time. /s

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

At this point so much debris has begun falling that the next floor collapses before all the debris has event hit it.

I'm dumbfounded how stupid this is. You're free to read what Richard Gage and Dr. Husely have to say and write about the demolition sequence. Something NIST said was inevitable but all indications clearly show explosives were used and AEfor9/11 truth proves their use. In addition, ACARS proves beoynd doubt that UA93 and UA175 were flying well after their alleged crashes hundreds of miles west.

[–]package 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You think multiple floors of debris is going to fall as a flat 2d surface with no vertical separation?

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, but to streamline down and destroy the core section with clear evidence of explosives... I rest my case. They were demolished, clear as day, with PETN and detcord.

[–]package 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

How exactly do you think the fall should have looked?