Nanotechnology

submitted by Fireslinger from self.conspiracy

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The vaccine is the least of our issues if anyone has nanobot tech. They won't need to inject us with it. See Gray Goo scenario.

We need to find a safe method / procedure that can disable the nanotech within a human body:

EMP should work fine on a small scale, something that small is unlikely to be hardened against radiation. It's when they get everywhere you're fucked, it'd be like whack a mole trying to get rid of them.

[–]Fireslinger[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The vaccine is the least of our issues if anyone has nanobot tech. They won't need to inject us with it.

I was contemplating that last night, and came up with a theory: this type of nanotech actually does need to be injected into its host. Covid is the perfect justification for it. If the nanotech could be aerosolized, then they would've simply amped up the chemtrail projects. I think that the chemtrail projects / morgellons / targeted individuals were more like beta tests. This is a new animal, based off research from the criminal experiments they've been running for decades.

Speaking of goo, what do you make of black goo being used? The black structures in those videos remind me of what Harold Klaus Vella brought to light... extraterrestrial AI, in the form of black goo.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Speaking of goo, what do you make of black goo being used?

Made me think of carbon but I do question the veracity of the source.

This is a new animal, based off research from the criminal experiments they've been running for decades.

Why not just stick it in the flu vaccine then?

I don't believe our tech is anywhere near this, especially medically. We can only fix the easy stuff most of the time, and the methods are a lot more brutal and basic than most people assume. Our newest meds are not improvements on what came before, but the stuff they can patent because it's new. They often are more dangerous and work worse.

There could be a level of tech hidden from the general population but I think this would represent a leap so massive that then I'd I start considering aliens because I don't think we can hide something that big that would need hundreds if not thousands of people to study and develop the nanotech as well as patients to test it on over decades.

[–]Fireslinger[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why not just stick it in the flu vaccine then?

I'm thinking it's because the vaccine was designed to interface with the virus itself. Or, the vaccine was created before the virus. This video points out that the virus produces tentacle-like structures. The vaccine also produces these structures, which suggests that they interface in some way. It's all still being researched. First thing I thought of, is the analogy of a public and private key.

I tend to disagree with your other points, because this tech has been in development since at least the 1950's, possibly even earlier. Remember, compartmentalization is very effective for these black projects. The scientists do not know the bigger picture of what they're working on.