you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

i did watch the video, he didn't say that. Then it started showing idiocrisy which was kind of cool, I liked that movie.

Do you have anything besides that video?

[–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

He did say that in the video. Others can watch the video and judge for themselves.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So nothing else? I have another question, so do you think he was right to not fight it? Do you agree with the strategy to say he had free speech, was just mistaken with his opinion, and to blame it on psychosis? Wouldn't it have been better to show facts about the sandy hook case and try to show it was some sort of false flag or that the media did lie about it? Is that maybe why they didn't allow it to be shown to a jury and just a judge? I'm not a lawyer and I'm not sure what determines what cases get a jury and which ones don't. I only really saw a judge when I had speeding tickets and I guess a jury just isn't necessary for that.

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Do you agree with the strategy to say he had free speech, was just mistaken with his opinion,

Yes, because this is the truth.

Is that maybe why they didn't allow it to be shown to a jury and just a judge?

Denial of trial by jury violates the constitution. But the scum in charge don't care about the constitution. They are ruthless scum only interested in power. Decent people should wake up and realize that the system is hopelessly corrupt and that America has become an evil cesspool that only deserves to be hated. Avoid the system and make plans to escape from America before it is too late.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

the constitutional right to trial by jury is about criminals, but Alex was getting sued for money. I do agree this was about power and putting a chilling effect out towards those who question sandy hook and the bigger picture is not just sandy hook but questioning any of the fake news the MSM puts out. I just would have liked to see alex fight it and not just saying he made a mistake.

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The seventh amendment says:

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/oct/01/alex-jones-infowars-sandy-hook-liable-lawsuits-damagessays :

The rulings are “default judgments”, or rare de facto losses, because of Jones’s repeated failure to comply with discovery, or the process of producing documents for a court case. The court will convene a jury to consider damages.

So I guess they will get a jury but they will have to say how much he has to pay. And Alex will tell the jury he was mistaken but he had the free speech right to say it. So maybe the jury could come back and say he has to pay like one dollar if they agree it is free speech? But I guess it's unlikely because they can easily bribe the jury and it will cost like twenty million.