you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

How did AJ damage these parents' reputations? Seems like a weak defamation case.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

he called the one guy a crisis actor

they also said he failed to provide information. I think it was basically asking "if that guy is a crisis actor, why did you think that, what proof or evidence for that made you say that?" Like even if it was just Alex's opinion, why, what did he base that on, not even giving any info on it makes it look bad so then he might as well say he is guilty of the charges and pay his fine. I honestly don't know why he wouldn't try to fight it because there are a lot of fishy things going on with the Sandy Hook case where he could explain why he had an opinion the way he did. It is hard to prove defamation but if a guy doesn't even try to defend himself I don't blame a judge for finding him guilty. The whole thing is weird IMO.

They also accused him of fomenting violence and causing sandy hook parents to get death threats sent at them, that is harder to prove, it was like when Trump said we'll fight like hell and dems said that he then ordered his followers to attack the capitol, but law experts explained why that is protected free speech.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This is super weird. Maybe AJ's handlers told him to back off and lose the case by not trying.

he called the one guy a crisis actor

ahh, that's something substantial.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

it's like, Alex wasn't the only one thinking that, the video where the guy was laughing then stopped to give his speech to the news. If I was AJ I'd have brought a tv into the court room and then showed that as evidence as to why he said the guy was a crisis actor.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

AJ doesn't have to worry about money, as he'll be paid handsomely for continuing to spread disinformation. For him, there is no such thing as bad press, or a bad lawsuit. He's a reminder that the .01%, Russian oligarchs, Israel influencers, Big Corp and others need him to distract, discredit and try to humiliate the 99%, all while appearing that he's part of the 99%. Referring to someone as a crisis actor and losing a lawsuit about it is nothing in the broad scheme of his ultra-right wing purpose, to fuck over the 99%. Any media outlet that supports him should be boycotted, because they otherwise help him incite violence. He's a traitor to the US.