Pfizer Scientist: ‘Your Antibodies are Probably Better than the Vaccination’

submitted by salvia_d from (projectveritas.com)

all 61 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]salvia_d[S] 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (15 children)

There is so much more that is revealed in these hidden camera discussions, one being that Pfizer is looking into the heart issue, especially in the youth, and they are very concerned. Why isn't this on the front pages of every news agency? Crazy!

[–]FlippyKing 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Why isn't this on the front page? Drug company advertising, and their donations to every politician and anywhere else they can throw money around. Doctors are more concerned with being able to pay off their students while enjoying their girlfriends and country club memberships than doing any skeptical thinking about a system that rewards them so well, same with everyone else. It's one big club, and we ain't in it.

[–]proc0 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

we know why lol. This is for the sheep to understand they're being lied to.

[–]WhoFlu 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Even plebeians like myself have known about the myocarditis and pericarditis issues for several months. A little odd they're only now looking into it.

[–]Tophat123 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Not odd. They gotta pretend that they still care.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

plenty of msm sources admit that like cdc and nytimes so this isn't the gotcha some might think

[–]WhoFlu 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know anyone claimed it was a huge gotcha.

The problem with this entire pandemic is there's a LOT of information that is pretty well known, but censored from social media and many mainstream sources. The lab-leak theory was pretty strong in March 2020, however you weren't allowed to talk about it for the longest time, and since then the evidence has only gotten much stronger, and a little over a year later, the MSM finally acknowledged what many of us already knew for over a year.

IMO, you might want to lower your expectations. I get the impression that a lot of people expect PV videos and leaks to be equivalent to what Edward Snowden dropped on the world, or some of the larger wikileaks dumps. Those kinds of leaks don't come around very often.

To someone like you or more, this is info we already know. However, it confirms we're not going crazy, and that the media gaslighting is gaslighting. To a normie that just watches the news, and only hangs out on mainstream social-media sites, this peels back the curtains in ways they might not be exposed to.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

by definition a project veritas video is supposed to be a gotcha

owning the libs, it sells, they get donations. And yes it is good to reveal corruption. I think this is great to do. But it's not exactly new news. I don't want to lower my expectations, I want to always demand better, that kind of pressure would be good for veritas and other journalists. Let's get some real people of power on camera instead of these lonely men working for pfizer. The main thing here Il ike and hope they use further is catfishing men with a hot girl and getting them to try to brag like this, revealing what they think will get the woman. Borat did this to Rudy. It is a guy's main weakness. If a guy is gay I'd hope project veritas sets them up with a hot guy. And then don't edit the video, release it if it's like a half hour long, you can also show shorter clips. But they always make the excuse that veritas edits the videos and I can't argue agaisnt that because they do.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

veritas edits their videos too much so people figure this is fake

this is why they should just release entire thing

[–]WhoFlu 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I'm a huge fan of the fact that they do the releases they do, but their edits drive me a little nutty. The repeating of clips starts acting as a time-waster and I hate repetition. They need to fire, or at least re-train whoever is editing their videos.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yeah liberal media heavily edits all their reports to oso they figure they need to fight fire with fire but how about not being like liberal media and just release all facts, let us judge for themselves. I bet on the fake dates the pfizer guys also said stuff that makes the vaccines look good or whatever so they cut that out but come on no need to do that, just release all info, let us decide for ourselves.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

People who give Veritas material sufficient thought will appreciate that it's part of a disinformation campaign by wealthy influencers.

[–]GST893 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You are part of a disinformation campaign. Have another .06¢ shill.

[–]Tophat123 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

All you people ever do is regurgitate the exact same buzz words. No one takes you seriously.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Perhaps think before you accuse Saiditors of dishonesty.

[–]Bigs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Said the sockpuppet called socks ffs.

[–]One_Jack_Move 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Most of us have believed that natural immunity is best immunity. Especially with these "70%" effective "vaccines". But it's good to see actual Pfizer scientists saying it and even explaining why. And it's said here in a casual situation (howbeit undercover) so it comes off as very honest.

The next logical thought is: Are (were) we wrong to use leaky vaxes on the entire population to attempt a sketchy herd immunity? Or would we be significantly better off vaxing(or, in the beginning, isolating) only the high-risk people - and then allow the strong, healthy ones to catch it and gain stronger, natural immunity? I've always leaned toward the latter, and the more evidence I see, the more I am convinced.

[–]nolocus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's all about the money. Vaccine patents are manna from heaven for these companies. They don't care about you, the J&J baby powder problem is an example; https://www.cosmeticsandtoiletries.com/regulatory/safety/Jury-Finds-JJ-Negligent-Orders-29-M-Payout-for-Baby-Powder-Lawsuit-575161351.html

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (40 children)

...which is why one takes the vaccine. That's how vaccines work, to help build antibodies (by introducing a harmlessly miniscule version of the virus for the antibodies to work on). Project Veritas appeals to those who missed that day in school.

Indeed - COVID-19 VACCINE EXPOSED!!! - lol

[–]mahavishnunj 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (30 children)

...which is why one takes the vaccine. That's how vaccines work, to help build antibodies (by introducing a harmlessly miniscule version of the virus for the antibodies to work on). Project Veritas appeals to those who missed that day in school.

Except these non vaccines don't do that.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (29 children)

So you prefer to argue that a vaccine is a non vaccine? That's a non-starter.

[–]mahavishnunj 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (12 children)

So you prefer to argue that a vaccine is a non vaccine? That's a non-starter.

so you prefer to argue that the definition of 'vaccine' was CHANGED just to fit in this bullshit people are taking now? and they STILL arent real vaccines? you have meta'd the fuck out of 'non-starter.'

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

See - here's the problem. How does one start a conversation that refutes facts at the outset. Should we argue about what a fact is or is not? Is a chair a chair? Is a table a table? And yes, the COVID vaccine is a vaccine. This the medical definition.

[–]mahavishnunj 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

See - here's the problem. How does one start a conversation that refutes facts at the outset. Should we argue about what a fact is or is not? Is a chair a chair? Is a table a table? And yes, the COVID vaccine is a vaccine. This the medical definition.

even the changed definition doesnt work: 'A vaccine is a biological preparation that provides active acquired immunity to a particular infectious disease. '

none of the non vaccines do that. AT ALL. would you like to give me more fish to shoot in a barrel? please keep this going if youd like.

edit: i dont think ive gotten to own u/socks before, this is not as fun as i thought it might be.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Oh dear - you've 'owned' me. What are we, 12?

Continue the definition:

A vaccine is a biological preparation that provides active acquired immunity to a particular infectious disease. A vaccine typically contains an agent that resembles a disease-causing microorganism and is often made from weakened or killed forms of the microbe, its toxins, or one of its surface proteins. (wikipedia)

And:

A substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease. (Oxford Languages dictionary)

[–]mahavishnunj 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Oh dear - you've 'owned' me. What are we, 12?

im just replying with the same level of intelligence ive been presented with here, dont want to give a soft head a migraine or injury. i can dumb it down more for you if you cant wrap your head around what ive already said.

A vaccine is a biological preparation that provides active acquired immunity to a particular infectious disease

A substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases

more hand holding required to understand that?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

So now - because you cannot argue about facts (or lies), you have to resort to insults. The COVID vaccine is indeed a vaccine. Yes, it helps you develop immunity. It's not difficult to understand.

[–]mahavishnunj 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

It's not difficult to understand.

not for most of us, but apparently its REALLY hard for you. you cant process the extremely basic shit ive spelled out for you FROM YOUR OWN SOURCES. lol

[–]Tophat123 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is difficult to prove seeing as how you dumbasses refuse to look at how the most injected places in the world have the worst case numbers. Quite unusual for a vaccine that is supposed to work.

[–]GST893 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Gene therapy, not a vax just cause they changed the definition to suit it. How many sites must you shill on to afford food. .06¢ per reply is rat shit.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Seems you lack confidence in your opinion here, so that you have to include an insult here and elsewhere. Have a look at the Saidit POD, and also learn about vaccines, rather than believe the disinformation campaigns about gene therapy. Don't support Big Corp and Amazon with your anti-vax support of the continuation of lockdowns.

[–]GST893 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Not my opinion as it's fact. I insult you because that is what you deserve, as you are a shill. Take the POD and shove it squarely up your ass.

"Don't support Big Corp and Amazon with your anti-vax support of the continuation of lockdowns." Do you realize this statement makes no sense whatsoever, or are you mentally retarded?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Your name-calling is obviously informative of your inability understand and discuss facts. Had you that ability, you'd not feel the need to be so defensive and aggressive. Calm down and read about the vaccine at a website that's not pushing Big Corp anti-vax propaganda.

[–]GST893 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Thanks for the state sponsored talking point, but I'm very well read on the subject. The facts speak for themselves. Again I repeat, you are a statist/big pharma shill and you deserve to be insulted and derided. You are sub-human scum.

[–]fschmidt 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You are sub-human scum.

All members of modern culture are sub-human scum.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

++

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are sub-human scum.

Bit of an overreaction, isn't it. It shows a lack of confidence in and knowledge of your own points. Try having a normal conversation with a normal person (ie. 3 or 4 billion other people) who has had the vaccine and knows something about what it does. Will you call that person sub-human scum and a shill? That's a lot of people who probably don't agree with your anti-science opinions and those of 30 others on Saidit. Numerous sub-humans. Like a horror movie. Be careful out there.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

strike 1 for name calling. you can prove that definitions have been changed, do it

[–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

and also learn about vaccines

LOL!!

whoever is writing your scripts...they need to do WAY better. that wasnt even convincing for dumb troll shit. hire me, i can do better than this!

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Go on then, learn about vaccines. I'll wait...

[–]Tophat123 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It is an experimental mrna gene therapy, clearly not a vaccine seeing as how a vaccine is supposed to not cause damage to the user, block the user from the sickness it was created for.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's beside the point. It's a vaccine, for all of the reasons I've alreay mentioned.

[–]WhoFlu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

He's right that these don't fit the classic definition of a vaccine.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's not called a vaccine because of a secret government plot, or whatever illogical excuse someone wants to make about it. And all vaccines are not the same. It is officially, scientifically a vaccine.

[–]Tophat123 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No it is not. Stop shilling like a bitch

[–]WhoFlu 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's shit that literally everyone should know with a gradeschool education, but we've been gaslight by the media for the last 2 years.

Even the "vaccines" themselves rely on the human body creating anti-bodies, they don't provide immunity themselves, so some super-super-super basic logic is that there's no chance in hell a vaccine with any modern technology that could do more than natural immunity.

[–]proc0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

mRNA shots introduce instructions for your cells to produce "spike proteins" that help fight the actual virus.

1) they don't introduce a "miniscule version of the virus"

2) they introduce RNA instructions that make your cells produce something else that is argued helps fight the virus

3) it's being pushed like the only possible solution when there's overwhelming proof it's not (the point of the PV investigation)

Project Veritas appeals to those who missed that day in school.

You're the one spreading misinformation. Either you're a shill or a sheep. Either way, please reconsider. At this point, you're either on the side of the tyrants or the side of humanity.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Well don't stop with those 3 points. You're missing the point ahout the way in which the vaccine helps produce antibodies:

Other immune cells, called B cells, may bump into the coronavirus spikes on the surface of vaccinated cells, or free-floating spike protein fragments. A few of the B cells may be able to lock onto the spike proteins. If these B cells are then activated by helper T cells, they will start to proliferate and pour out antibodies that target the spike protein. One of the sources, here..

The vaccine is still doing what vaccines do to help build antibodies.

[–]proc0 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So what? It's not as good as natural immunity, AND they lied to us about that.

Hiding alternative solutions has created massive distrust in institutions that want every single individual taking this "medicine" (it doesn't matter what we call it). It is more than clear the priority is not health, but rather, pushing this product, and also providing an infrastructure for punishing those who don't buy in.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's not as good as natural immunity

But that's not the reason to vaccinate as many people as possible, which is so that they can develop antibodies without having had COVID19, so that the virus doesn't spread and mutate as much as it would have done othersise, and vaccinated people are less likely to die if they get COVID19.

[–]proc0 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The reasons have changed over and over.

so that the virus doesn't spread and mutate as much as it would have done othersise

Explain Israel, Singapore and other places with 85%+ rates. Why is it failing there, if it is supposed to stop the spread? Mutation is even worse because of the "vaccine", that's how selective pressures work in nature.

vaccinated people are less likely to die if they get COVID19

Not everyone has the same immune system, age, health, etc. The risk factor is only reduced for high risk groups. And again, this is not acknowledge at all by the main narrative spread by the media and government.

The correct response to the pandemic should have been to quarantine the vulnerable ONLY, while getting the young and healthy to develop antibodies, so that when a vaccine shows up, there are less people that need to be immunized. The young people who wouldn't have wanted to take risk could have also freely quarantined themselves as has always been the case. No matter which way you look at this, health was never the main priority, even though it was supposed to be.

[–]Tophat123 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Amazing you still argue and convince absolutely no one

[–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No one convinces anyone of anything anymore because modern scum (both right and left) are too stupid to follow an argument. The only valid reasons to post at all are to vent and to hope that someone who rejects modern culture reads what one writes.

[–]Tophat123 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're a dumbass. Figures you would ignore all the key points and keep vomiting the same tired talking points that do not correlate with actual information.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They're not mutually exclusive.

If you get vaccinated before getting infected you have a much better course of infection, and you still get the immune benefits of the infection.

And vice-versa. If you vaccinate post infection, you're safer than the infection alone. Although that way around, you have to get infected with no protection, which is dangerous.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😮