you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

/u/hibikiblack

Part 1

The Rothschilds were originally against the establishment of a Jewish enthnostate. There are written transcripts in the Rothschild archives illustrating this. Due to their philanthropy with Jewish (rabbinate) causes in the 19th century, they believed establishing an ethnostate would cause more problems than not. It was when they aligned with British Israelism did they switch sides. Keep in mind, plutocratic Jews and Jewish banking houses have had a love hate relationship with the British; hence, the bombing of the King David Hotel or the sometimes violent competition between the British East India Company/British trade corporations and the Jewish trade corporations/banking houses such as the Loebs, Rothschilds, Gubzburgs, Sassoons, etc. What they gladly agreed with was their hatred for the common rural man in the US. In fact, by 1857 the Sassoons had taken over the trade routes and profits of the British East India company, totally monopolizing the opium trade, as detailed by Mary Kienholz in her book 'Opium Traders and Their World' Volume two. Still, the intermarriage between British royalty and Jewish plutocracy was frequent.

British Israelism promised a Jewish presence in Palestine with the declaration that the native Arab population remain in tact. This so-called treaty was more like a decree, which involved a secret promise that plutocratic Jews in the US would persuade Americans, or rather the US political class, to fight on the side of England against Germany when Americans were staunchly pro-Isolationist; even up to world war two would Americans remain as such, that is until Pearl Harbor which was used as the catalyst to intervene, though it only swayed a minority to the pro-interventionist side. Holding the majority of war bonds were plutocratic Jews in America: scholars proclaim that this makes sense considering Jewish persecution in Europe. They write that is was for 'moral' reasons.

Moreover, we see wealthy Zionist Jews forging documents and stealing land during the Ottoman empire and we also can observe the Kaiser and Templar groups trying to but failing to set up a colony in Jaffa for Templar control. The colonization/settler effort in Palestine was and always is a commercial endeavor. Rothschild's were little talked about in the Basel Zionist 'eugenics' congresses but what was talked about was the need to establish a Jewish state in Israel. The congresses were funded and incorporated by over 900 corporations, Jew and non-Jews alike. These ideologues, through Jewish banking houses in NYC, the Palestine Land Development Corporation, Herzl and his comrades who held public securities which they more than likely cashed in; were front and center in this commercial endeavor, and when they weren't forging documents and covertly stealing land, they funded radical revisionist Ziofascist Jewish terrorist groups, such as the Irgun, Haganah, Lehi and the Stern Gang who pillaged, raped, destroyed, murdered and plundered natives off their land.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Of course, as a skeptic, I must point out that this is the public story that we're allowed to know. Naturally we'll never get access to their deep secrets, whether they confirm this or tell other stories.

It was when they aligned with British Israelism did they switch sides.

This British-Jewish partnership makes practical sense. The biggest banksters with the biggest empire on the globe.

If you had two mighty powers, whether they be nations, religions, banks, corporations, movie producers, manufacturers, brands, whatever - it often makes sense to partner up into a monopoly rather than be competition.

Even if the Brits and Jews hate each other, much like the Republicans and Democrats, all these Machiavellians have much more in common and can agree the sheeple must be dominated.

Terrific Part 1 - clear, concise, easy to read - without links (I can look stuff up myself if needed).

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not a LaRouche supporter because he worshipepd Nahum Goldman of the World Jewish Congress who basically advocated the destruction of Edom and all nations for the peace of Jews but LaRouche in his campaigner mag., hired some Jewish and non-Jewish authors to write research papers on the British-Jewish alliance. Such info is found nowhere else. I don't believe everything is true but take out their worship of Alexander Hamilton (Levine) and you can learn a lot from LaRouche, also take a more objective approach and do not think because Hamilton was a monopolist Jew who loved monarchy that Andrew Jackson who allegedly 'fought the (their) banks' was any better. In other words, Trump and Alex Jones love Jackson and Jackson via Levi Woodbury and Taney made the Hosue of Rothschilds fiscal agents of the US to Europe. So much for fighting the banks!

https://archive.org/download/TheCampaignerDecember1978/The_campaigner_-_December_1978.pdf

^ ^ ^ Also, skip over the write up on Hitler because half of that is disinfo.

If you had two mighty powers, whether they be nations, religions, banks, corporations, movie producers, manufacturers, brands, whatever - it often makes sense to partner up into a monopoly rather than be competition.

Exactly, Mary Kienholz's books entitled 'Opium Traders and Their World' Vol 1 and 2 provides ,uch detail on this alliance.

Even if the Brits and Jews hate each other, much like the Republicans and Democrats, all these Machiavellians have much more in common and can agree the sheeple must be dominated.

Exactly, it's a class of people that do not and never will represent the workers and middle class that provide for them. They are mostly parasites destroying the world through all kinds of schemes and theater. Certain Jews of the revisionist Zionist terror groups certainly hated Britian in the 1940's but this was more an 'okay, you gave us part of Palestine, now we're going to kill Arabs and drive them from their land," and the British were like, "how about you don't do that right now," and they were like, "No, we will do this and we'll bomb the King David Hotel too."