Radical conspiracism as a tool of the ruling groups. History as the foundation of ethics.

submitted by HibikiBlackCaudillo from self.conspiracy

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I've never mentioned the Roths. Do you see what I am meaning? You are fixated.

Jewish people fucked over the Scottish clans during the 1700-1800's. Many of the current clan chieftains are from Jewish lines. These people aren't Catholics or Jesuits. They are Jewish. However, from what I can tell, a cult hides in that religion, much like it does in Catholicism.

It's the same cult.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

It's not some secret cult, sect, clan, whatever.

It's the ruling class, lots of folks from all walks despite some dominant tribes. IMO this term cannot be confused nor disinfoed.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Some of them are real sneaky though, like Jeffery Epstein and Alefantis. "Normal" folks amongst the sheep.

I do believe they are cultic, more so than any religion, excepts perhaps hardliners. And, yes, I know they are in power, and they are of the top class in society, but they rule nothing but a house of cards, a network of lies and blackmailing, and an army of sheep and goons. I only worry about their army of sheep and goons. I don't like to refer to them as "elites" "rulers" or the like, but it is accurate in the right context.

Most people would respond well to your terminology.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Those "sneaks" are not normal, nor secret. They just didn't have publicity before.

Yes, members of the ruling class are always Machiavellian and usually (perhaps always) cultic (with group norms and rituals) and occult (secretive), among many other descriptions depending on the particular sects or tribes of whoever you're describing under that ruling class umbrella.

they rule nothing but a house of cards

It's not just a house of cards. It's a full spectrum dominance matrix of rigged systems and each system is made of many sub-card-houses - guarded by other rigged systems of control (judiciary, police, military, banksters, media, etc) and the sheeple citizenry. When a house of cards fall (intentionally) the collateral damage is limited. Dominoes would have been preferred, but their grand chessboard has been engineered to be more stable and complex than these simplistic gaming metaphors.

I also avoid using "elites" except when I need it to be short. The rulers rig/write the rules. They don't rule you and I, but they do rule the sheeple's minds. Perhaps "influencers" or "influencer class" are better, but some folks may be confused by "influencer".

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Using "elite" is fine. They are elite at lying.

The house of cards analogy of course falls apart if scrutinized, but I really do mean it in this way: they have built an unsustainable machine. They are desperately banking on and planning for a planned crash, where they can rebuild as they like.

I do not think they will succeed. They will crash the house though, and it'll be a damn mess.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They are desperately banking on and planning for a planned crash, where they can rebuild as they like.

Truth.

And they're taking their sweet fucking time with it, drawing it out, depopulating, fostering civil war, etc. This is forcing us to wage war on ourselves (or rather, our fellow sheeple people) as well as their authority puppets (police, judiciary, military, government, etc), as well as them if we can ever even get near them.