you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (35 children)

LMAO at this. Can you explain to me how is the Greater Israel theory plausible after finding out that the Roths are a group of Jewish traitors in service to the Vatican and that the Vatican owns the lands of Israel? With the Jesuits being the downright most anti-Semitic group on earth? I would like to see you try Jason. I already gave you all the links.

For whatever It's worth, I think I tried my best to explain things and the last thing I want is ill will among us Saiditors...

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (34 children)

LMAO at this. Can you explain to me how is the Greater Israel theory plausible

The Holocaust was just a magic number in the 1800s but they made it happen, allegedly - and forced the "Jews" to settle in other nations and what is now Israel. The Balfour Declaration was just a piece of paper. Now it's a nation, allowed to be the only apartheid nation in the world, allowed to have nukes and not declare them, allowed to be the secret number six in the Five Eyes surveilling the world, allowed to cause shit in the region without consequence, allowed to support all the evils of the world, including 9/11 and ISIS, and is illegally expanding by taking over parts of Syria - with no indication of stopping. Before you say I'm being selectively anti-Zionist, I'll also point out their ally Saudi Arabia was also similarly manufactured and hosts another evil, Wahhabism, supported by the West and Zion.

after finding out that the Roths are a group of Jewish traitors in service to the Vatican and that the Vatican owns the lands of Israel?

I just don't give a shit about these details or any of this crap, whether they're true or not. Why? Because you haven't bothered to EXPLAIN WHY IT ACTUALLY MATTERS. You keep avoiding this.

With the Jesuits being the downright most anti-Semitic group on earth? I would like to see you try Jason. I already gave you all the links.

I don't care.
Fuck your links.
Fuck the Zionists.
Fuck the Jesuits.
Fuck the distinctions without any differences.
MAKE ME UNDERSTAND AND CARE.
Explain why it actually matters.
Or you're just a tribalist timesuck.

For whatever It's worth, I think I tried my best to explain things and the last thing I want is ill will among us Saiditors...

No - you copped out, with "this isn't something I respect at all." Go back and properly respond as I did. Start back here. It's not too late to win us over by explaining clearly, but you may soon loose your chance with me. We're willing to understand, but communication takes two.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

/u/hibikiblack

Part 1

The Rothschilds were originally against the establishment of a Jewish enthnostate. There are written transcripts in the Rothschild archives illustrating this. Due to their philanthropy with Jewish (rabbinate) causes in the 19th century, they believed establishing an ethnostate would cause more problems than not. It was when they aligned with British Israelism did they switch sides. Keep in mind, plutocratic Jews and Jewish banking houses have had a love hate relationship with the British; hence, the bombing of the King David Hotel or the sometimes violent competition between the British East India Company/British trade corporations and the Jewish trade corporations/banking houses such as the Loebs, Rothschilds, Gubzburgs, Sassoons, etc. What they gladly agreed with was their hatred for the common rural man in the US. In fact, by 1857 the Sassoons had taken over the trade routes and profits of the British East India company, totally monopolizing the opium trade, as detailed by Mary Kienholz in her book 'Opium Traders and Their World' Volume two. Still, the intermarriage between British royalty and Jewish plutocracy was frequent.

British Israelism promised a Jewish presence in Palestine with the declaration that the native Arab population remain in tact. This so-called treaty was more like a decree, which involved a secret promise that plutocratic Jews in the US would persuade Americans, or rather the US political class, to fight on the side of England against Germany when Americans were staunchly pro-Isolationist; even up to world war two would Americans remain as such, that is until Pearl Harbor which was used as the catalyst to intervene, though it only swayed a minority to the pro-interventionist side. Holding the majority of war bonds were plutocratic Jews in America: scholars proclaim that this makes sense considering Jewish persecution in Europe. They write that is was for 'moral' reasons.

Moreover, we see wealthy Zionist Jews forging documents and stealing land during the Ottoman empire and we also can observe the Kaiser and Templar groups trying to but failing to set up a colony in Jaffa for Templar control. The colonization/settler effort in Palestine was and always is a commercial endeavor. Rothschild's were little talked about in the Basel Zionist 'eugenics' congresses but what was talked about was the need to establish a Jewish state in Israel. The congresses were funded and incorporated by over 900 corporations, Jew and non-Jews alike. These ideologues, through Jewish banking houses in NYC, the Palestine Land Development Corporation, Herzl and his comrades who held public securities which they more than likely cashed in; were front and center in this commercial endeavor, and when they weren't forging documents and covertly stealing land, they funded radical revisionist Ziofascist Jewish terrorist groups, such as the Irgun, Haganah, Lehi and the Stern Gang who pillaged, raped, destroyed, murdered and plundered natives off their land.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Of course, as a skeptic, I must point out that this is the public story that we're allowed to know. Naturally we'll never get access to their deep secrets, whether they confirm this or tell other stories.

It was when they aligned with British Israelism did they switch sides.

This British-Jewish partnership makes practical sense. The biggest banksters with the biggest empire on the globe.

If you had two mighty powers, whether they be nations, religions, banks, corporations, movie producers, manufacturers, brands, whatever - it often makes sense to partner up into a monopoly rather than be competition.

Even if the Brits and Jews hate each other, much like the Republicans and Democrats, all these Machiavellians have much more in common and can agree the sheeple must be dominated.

Terrific Part 1 - clear, concise, easy to read - without links (I can look stuff up myself if needed).

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not a LaRouche supporter because he worshipepd Nahum Goldman of the World Jewish Congress who basically advocated the destruction of Edom and all nations for the peace of Jews but LaRouche in his campaigner mag., hired some Jewish and non-Jewish authors to write research papers on the British-Jewish alliance. Such info is found nowhere else. I don't believe everything is true but take out their worship of Alexander Hamilton (Levine) and you can learn a lot from LaRouche, also take a more objective approach and do not think because Hamilton was a monopolist Jew who loved monarchy that Andrew Jackson who allegedly 'fought the (their) banks' was any better. In other words, Trump and Alex Jones love Jackson and Jackson via Levi Woodbury and Taney made the Hosue of Rothschilds fiscal agents of the US to Europe. So much for fighting the banks!

https://archive.org/download/TheCampaignerDecember1978/The_campaigner_-_December_1978.pdf

^ ^ ^ Also, skip over the write up on Hitler because half of that is disinfo.

If you had two mighty powers, whether they be nations, religions, banks, corporations, movie producers, manufacturers, brands, whatever - it often makes sense to partner up into a monopoly rather than be competition.

Exactly, Mary Kienholz's books entitled 'Opium Traders and Their World' Vol 1 and 2 provides ,uch detail on this alliance.

Even if the Brits and Jews hate each other, much like the Republicans and Democrats, all these Machiavellians have much more in common and can agree the sheeple must be dominated.

Exactly, it's a class of people that do not and never will represent the workers and middle class that provide for them. They are mostly parasites destroying the world through all kinds of schemes and theater. Certain Jews of the revisionist Zionist terror groups certainly hated Britian in the 1940's but this was more an 'okay, you gave us part of Palestine, now we're going to kill Arabs and drive them from their land," and the British were like, "how about you don't do that right now," and they were like, "No, we will do this and we'll bomb the King David Hotel too."

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (27 children)

What's the point in me keep explaining things when you clearly don't care about the facts?

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Gimme a fucking break. You seem illegitimate by always evading and missing an opportunity to win hearts and minds with reason and a logical case for your obsession. I don't want you be, and I'm bending over backwards to give you a chance to legitimately explain your viewpoint, but you're forcing me to write you off when you talk in circles - like socks.

You very well know facts can be selective and manipulated and spun. Fuck the details.

Share the OVERVIEW.

I am willing to learn why the Jesuit over Zionist issue actually matters. With greater contextual understanding I can find all the facts I want myself doing my own research.

Also, I did say... " Give me 3 examples, no more, no less, of how it went wrong and how it would have been better (more meaningful) opposing government if we were to recognize that Jesuits are over Zionists. " Call these facts if you like.

If you can't explain a clear distinction worth all this fuss or provide any actionable alternatives and solutions, I'll be forced to assume you're just all talk, a tribalist, a Zionist, and/or a distraction (like the almost pointless anti-American bot), or worse - despite the fact that you post lots of other great content on the regular.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

He won't. I hope he does, but I know he won't.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

I simply don't think he is capable. He has a mental roadblock, a victim complex (legit and/or not), a traumatic past, a deep prejudice, and a deeply researched knowledge vault that has been selectively accrued to favour his biases. That's powerful stuff and impossible to break through unless someone is open to breaking through it.

For example, you are convinced there's a sky God. You are an atheist against all religions and Gods - except you have one more to go. You would have to actually be open to the idea that there is no "higher power".

Similarly, there's no way in fictional Hell that you can convince me the myths of the Bible are real.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I won't convinve you but I believe there is a creator, who isn't a person.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I also believe in a Creator who isn't a "person" (I'd like to hear what you meany by person, though) and I believe the Creator is life-affirming, but I leave it at that. There isn't enough factual, testable, reliable information concerning the details of said Creator.

IMO, that is why folks like u/JasonCarswell focus on Natural Law instead. It's much more reliable, and will actually help you produce tangible results. The Creator made the Creation. Who cares what the Creator is/believes, we live in Creation, and we have a natural place here as movers and shakers. There are natural systems in place, ever-shifting to fit the growing, evolving Creation. The best "fallen" man can do is understand the Laws, and grow therein.

One of those laws is to never cede authority to anything unless you've met them, touched them, spoken with them, and understood them completely to the point of utter trust. Have you done this with the Jewish god, Yahweh? With Jesus? With the Creator of the Cosmos?

There must come a point where you realize that the Creation can be tested and understood, but anything beyond the Creation is beyond man. Man has been given authority of his own. We must learn how to grow and stabilize our race/planet in reality, or else evil forces will retard our evolution and make us slaves, or worse, destroy our planet before its time (they are doing this right now). This can only be done through understanding Natural Law, science, rather than philosophy, myth, or religion.

Now, those three things help relay ancient understandings of Natural Law, but they are so co-opted, it's not even funny. Anyone who grew up in the Church who becomes red-pilled on the Zionists and Rome, but they still trust the Bible, isn't thinking hard enough about the situation our race has gotten itself into.

It's kind of like mass psychosis. Who are you, or some Muslim, or some Jew, to say that the Creator of the Cosmos has taken human form, and walked amongst us? Or that he gave special tablets to some Hebrews long ago?

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I wouldn't go so far as to say Natural Law is reliable other than it's rational, logical, and provable. It's a general rule to treat your own kind nicely and there are of course lots of creatures and people who terrible things to their own kind. Hell, even the courtship of females has males harming each other for a chance.

And ultimately Natural Law is remixed by a few commandments: do not lie/cheat, steal, or murder.

Further, I've experienced a lot of "psychic states". I don't mean woo. I'm not psychic or any shit like that. I mean I've done many types of drugs - from mild to ego killing, psychedelic to trans-dimensional, coma dope to the k-hole. I've also been a manic depressive long before I learned what that was and that I was one. And I endured the tortures of the damned on big pharma "anti"-depressant poisons. Of course I've also had wildly diverse dream experiences, have an interest in optical /s/Illusions, and understand pareidolia. Plus as a computer animator creating countless TV ads and stuff I was exposed to marketing, spin, and the arts of persuasion - a short step to propaganda, psychological operations, cults, social viruses, religion, etc. And I've observed people.

In short, I know very well how our minds can play tricks on us and exercising skepticism in all things is the most healthy thing we can do for our mental health, IMO.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Being provable makes it more reliable in my eyes. I'd like to hear your thoughts on why you wouldn't call it so?

Skepticism is good, yes, but doubting the reality of your experiences is not. Not saying you necessarily do this, I am unsure, but many people who look into these things will doubt an extra-ordinary experience in the name of comfort. There is such a thing as being too closed minded, but I am certain you already know this from past experience, as do I. In fact, having a closed mind on certain topics will end up prohibiting one from the experiences related to said topics.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Or his He 1/3 person?

We can't ever know if there was/is a creator. Besides evolution (you can never find the first acorn because it's a slow evolutionary process without hard line definitions), or the idea that we're all part of a simulation, and our limited awareness and capabilities as tiny humans trapped on Earth like ants on island, there is no evidence or reason to believe there was a creator or designer beyond wishful thinking.

Plus there's the Epicurean Paradox: God is either all powerful but doesn't care or he cares but is impotent.

But a "creator" is not even what I was talking about.

Like many terms "God" is so flexible you can mean almost anything and justify almost anything, "under God."

I'm talking about the "moral authority" and the jealous judgemental God in the sky. Does God judge the behaviour of ants too? Or dogs? It's narcissistic to think humans are the only ones gifted with a soul, just as much as Jews think they're superior for magic reasons. This is brainwashing malarkey that I recon may help keep many simple people in line.

If he's so great then he doesn't need half the commandments telling us not to worship other Gods or to respect him. Same with parents. Again, it's more stuff to keep people in line.

It's sad that we need myths to keep us in line instead of Natural Law.

IMO, faith is wishful thinking somewhere between belief and hope, which are all good on this Earthly realm, but are ridiculous in the fictional sky heaven and/or afterlife.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Hope is fine. There is "amdir" or, looking up. This is the silly thing to look for in life, for it is temporal and fleeting.

Then, there is "estel" or, trust in reality. This is better, because it basically means "what should be, will be" and that is the best reaction to life, IMO. If you should retain your consciousness after death in some afterlife, its because in the natural system we call reality, it should happen, like an apple falling from a tree at the proper time due its approximate weight and stem strength. I mean to say that it probably doesn't happen often at all but that it has occurred, but probably just naturally.

I wish science would study the mind more. Reality is not just physicality, and although illusions and hallucinations are real, there are other functions and spheres of power that we have no knowledge on. It's not always "god" or "aliens" or "magic", it's just something we haven't studied yet, and probably would sound a little benign once scrutinized. Sometimes.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, that's better than even what I was only trying to say.

I often say "hope for the best and prepare for the worst", but it needs to be welded to reality. Some people may think hope for the best could mean an after life in heaven or winning the lottery - but that's not realistic. I'll skip imagining the extremist worst for all our sakes.

If you should retain your consciousness after death in some afterlife, its because in the natural system we call reality,

The entire afterlife myth is so absurd. Are you young again? If you got old and senile are you that way forever? I'm not the same person I was as I've forgotten much and learned much since, with many views the same as well as different. None of it makes sense, none of it is consistent, there's no way to know, and there is no evidence or reason to believe it's even possible beyond wishful thinking.

Jordan Peterson has his pros and cons, but I like when asked if he believes in God, Peterson always says that he lives his life as if God were real.

I judge myself more severely than any all-powerful God ever could. For some reason I can overlook other people's flaws, but upon reflection of my own past it's a cringe horror show, and even though they're usually minor by comparison the difference is that I own them for life.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So, you can't clearly explain your over arching theory without using "facts" as crutches. Any worthy theory should let anyone look information up on their own - otherwise it's a cult needing blind belief in selective "facts" rather than open transparent discovery.

It's obvious you're extremely prejudiced for some reason. I suspect your tribalist programming runs deep.

If you didn't post good content I'd say that you were a disinfo or chaos agent (and I'd have to make more noise about this shit). You may still be. At the very least you have a strong myopic bias on one topic.

I've given you every chance, MANY times, and now I'm giving up on you. But don't let this stop you from consulting with your anti-Jesuit friends or whatever or simply coming up with this yourself... You should be able to CLEARLY EXPLAIN YOUR THEORY, if not now, then eventually develop it for folks who will listen - if you actually want anyone to believe you and share this info. If you don't you'll just always be another kook on this "Jesuits over Zionists" issue.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

Also...

Pointing out problems with doom porn and being a critic is only helpful to a point.

You'll need to start bringing alternatives and solutions forward if you want to "oppose the government all tyranny in any meaningful way".

Thus far I haven't been impressed by any solutions from you.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

I pointed out my battle strategy at s/NationalistRevolution.

I also promote Saidit itself and my own subs the whole time... I don't see how the government can be opposed at all without embracing the revolutionary aspect. Even if your movement starts gaining heat, the government will infiltrate it and destroy it. The only way to implement solutions without violence is starting society in the wild.

I suppose I am kind of authoritarian on the Jesuit thing because I'm worried about the level of discourse. Why do you think the CIA goons don't take r/conspiracy itself all that seriously? because the level of discourse is absolute shit over there, despite the fact that It's one of the biggest subs in reddit. How can conspiracists become a menace to the government when they can't even agree on who runs things? My stand is that the Jesuits are the most powerful group in the NWO by a long margin, with them controlling all, or at least the most relevant intelligence agencies. And they are a group of anti-Semites, so getting too obsessed with the Jewish World Domination theories is counterproductive. They are literally Jesuit/CIA propaganda either way, like I documented.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

/u/jasoncarswell

My sub has the ideal that the Vatican/Jesuits are the main force behind the NWO, so talks about anti-Semitism won't be allowed here....

What Hibs means is that anything other than blaming Jesuits or even claiming that modern 'Jesuits' are not Catholics but Marrano Jews will get you the boot. Hibs is a censorship wueen and will ban anyone who disagrees with his views. I have never been able to post one thing on his subs in tesponse to him with him deleting it.

So, mentioning Jews who are not for the most part semitic won't be allowed.

First, it is probably best not to use this stupid anti-Semitic misnomer or rather take it up with the ADL and JINSA. They'll happily cry anti-semitism. I cannot believe a mod in an r/conspiracy sub uses this 'canard.' But this is my ONLY POST I'll make. Hibs is using trademark words that are masonic.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Censorship is the tool of cowards, deceivers, and tyrants who lack the courage to let their convictions speak for themselves and have no ability to be flexible, grow, or evolve. All legitimacy of whoever pulls the censorship trigger is automatically nullified as the ugliest stain smears their position while the censored statements may be validated.

Today I learned about "about" pages.

Today I also learned the /s/NationalistRevolution/about/rules/ are bullshit and rigged as hell. "Objective", LOL.

CC /u/HibikiBlack

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Brother, I can't tell you for sure that there couldn't be evil Zionist Jews mixed in among the NWO and all that, but I can tell you that all the big fishes behind the NWO are themselves anti-Semites, so the Greater Israel among the other Ultra-Zionist World Domination as the endgame theories are bullshit and part of a very sophisticated psyop.

When you guys tell other conspiracists to follow those theories, they develop the tunnel vision that they don't have to do any kind of other research and spend way more time investigating the Ultra-Zionist theories when they are mostly a waste of time. I think I already laid out exactly why. You may not be doing it out of ill will, but IMO you are setting up a very bad example for others to follow. Sorry but I have tons of tons of research on my side to back up my claims.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I don't see how the government can be opposed at all without embracing the revolutionary aspect. Even if your movement starts gaining heat, the government will infiltrate it and destroy it. The only way to implement solutions without violence is starting society in the wild.

Referencing the past I would agree. However, today we have much better communication tools and some of us are aware - and we need to share that awareness. Everyone should learn and be aware of not just the potential to be infiltrated but many of their tricks and tools of manipulation, deception, distraction, and division - among other things. By keeping everyone aware, obviously you must also temper them so they're not too paranoid and calling everyone a traitor. (I also temper myself by not calling you an "enemy" just because we have different ideas about who is at the top - thus I'm able to continue having constructive discussions seeking solutions.)

Further, IMO, we need to develop and promote fundamentals, like manifestos or constitutions or whatever, that lay out the basics clearly that cannot be deviated from. For example, I think FOTPACH is a good start (fair, open, transparent, peaceful, accountable, consistent, honest) for any and all management. Any management that cannot comply is fundamentally flawed and the people should demand better or at the very least be very skeptical.

Starting society in the wild has pros and cons. The old society already has a head start and you'll have to catch up on EVERYTHING. Being isolated makes you an easy target to pick off quietly. It's expensive to get everything out there or to relocate if needed or in emergencies. Of course there are lots of benefits to having freedom. I'm 50/50 for toughing it out in the city or striking out in the wild. In 10 years we shall see who's doing better under the New Normal.

I'm worried about the level of discourse.

IMO, you need not be. Most people may talk, but few do deep research, original research, or any action in real life. I can't even get folks here on SaidIt to do much for our /s/Cassy projects. SaidIt has old code and will not likely be around in 5 or 10 years - and we're not prepared nor are we developing options for community growth. Also, yesterday I spray-painted a 200 foot banner, and today I made two long flags to match (might make 2 more later), for our big rally tomorrow. I'm not expecting to speak to 2 thousand people again like I did on 8/28 five minutes before Chris Sky, but I'll prolly think of something to say before tomorrow noon. Even all of this won't amount to much beyond a publicity stunt with a way to network with wonderful local folks. We're not stopping anything - but we are representing and communicating. And critically, we (online and local) are still slowly developing and evolving plans. These plans have to be resilient, sustainable, FOTPATCH, and decentralized.

How can conspiracists become a menace to the government when they can't even agree on who runs things?

Who cares who's at the top? They all suck: Jesuits, Vatican, Zionists, London Inc, Washington DC, B.I.S., Illumaniti, aliens, etc.

Why do we have to agree? Or menace?

The government is not at the top. Why menace them, with their monopoly on violence? Why not just "menace" and discredit the Jesuits or whoever above them? Or all of "authority"? Build a compelling case for your argument and convince people to join your crusade. It's true that you can't win/please everyone all the time - but in this case it's obvious that whatever you've been doing has limited efficacy, so you have work to do with your crusade's community.

Why not just develop good alternatives and solutions to resist by carving out our own freedom instead of challenging an illegitimate evil force with all the power?

Their illegitimacy is becoming abundantly obvious to the masses with their mandates. Even several mothers with children at the playground yesterday agreed with us (that was the longest fence we could use to temporarily hang our banner, in half). We need to be ready with good information (as you do) to provide to all these new minds with questions - so they don't fall back under the MSM hypnosis. And to squash the infiltrators, disinfo shills, and simpletons.

My stand is that the Jesuits are the most powerful group in the NWO by a long margin, with them controlling all, or at least the most relevant intelligence agencies.

Yes, we get that. But how and why and to what end? We all know about the rise of Israel, their lame excuses, and their professed goals and ambitions and prophecies. I propose to you, that you draft up 3 posts in a series - about the historical rise of Jesuits, why they're doing it, and what their end goals are - but I have one caveat: You write it out to be as clear as possible for newb readers, WITHOUT using any links or citations. Consider these your ultimate benchmark explanations. Obviously you can link information in the comment section when people ask for evidence or specific details - but do NOT write the OP with the understanding that you will link to it later. Feel free to reference this "linkless overview challenge". Also, message me so I can immediately updoot it. It will be good or you'll hear about it from me or others in the comments, but I won't take away my votes.

And they are a group of anti-Semites, so getting too obsessed with the Jewish World Domination theories is counterproductive. They are literally Jesuit/CIA propaganda either way, like I documented.

I still don't know how you define "anti-Semites". There is a lot of intentional bullshit surrounding that term. There are legit folks who hate Jews. Some just despise Zionist actions. Some folks claim that criticizing the State Of Israel makes you anti-Semitic. Of course questioning the Holocaust, Hollywood, politicians, media, banksters, diamonds, secret agencies, military, etc etc etc gets you in hot water too - especially when you point out how many of this tiny global minority are in control.

Also, regardless of how much of a practical foothold (((they))) have, do you deny that there are legitimate "Jewish World Domination" plans out there? There really is no shortage of Jewish folks and Rabbis talking all kinds of shit that proves they have these plans and prophecies. Whether they can actually pull it off is another thing. And of course I know dozens of Jewish people who have nothing to do with any of that, from cousins to ex-lovers to bosses and employees. I know they are just normal people - unlike the ruling class who live by other rules (or without).

Why are these theories (about Jesuits, Zionists, or whoever) counterproductive? You've never explained that to me, nor resistance in a "meaningful way". If I can up my game and have more effect I'm all ears. You'll never affect my actions (ie. recruit me or make me "meaningful") or direction if you can't convince me.

Your documentation is moot. I'm sure it's nice but I won't read it until I have a reason to. I can prove the Moon is hollow or the Earth is flat but it doesn't make it so. You need to explain the overarching how / why / future-goals behind this alleged propaganda / agenda.

Also, explain the difference and overlaps of the Jesuit and CIA, as you stated, and how it's different than other overlapping groups (ie. British Royalty are also MI5, MI6, Germanic, Greek, Masons, banksters, globalists, helped start Israel, etc). I can believe the CIA are the top dogs more than I can the Jesuits - but even still, you have to have them trump the Zionists.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The Jesuits had a record of political subvertion and terrorist acts back when they were still the Knights Templar, but I suppose Loyola had the biggest influence when it comes to the modern Jesuits.

Overall, Catholicism is a religion that has a rejection of the material world in favour of asceticism and worship of Christ, but I think Loyola took this to a whole new level. He had a spiritual experience trying to search for answers by practicing extreme ways of asceticism in a cave in the middle of nowhere and basically went insane and completely destroyed his personality in the process.

I believe that's the origin of their policiy of radical supernaturalism. They associate the supernatural with Christ himself and see the material world as a corruption that shouldn't exist. They also hate the Jews and nationalists as a whole for being a materialist group.

One of their first crimes and foreshadowing of their insane ideas was the Jesuit Communist Empire in Latin America, which lasted over a hundred years and was the sign of trying to force their deranged monkery. But even that is not enough, they want a completely perfect communism.

The most relevant figures behind the globalist movement were Charles Darwin, Herbert Spencer, Andrew Carnegie, Cecil Rhodes, the Huxley family and H.G Wells and their Jesuit mentor Teilhard.

Teilhard, besides, being extremely influential in the modern capitalist societies, thought about the Omega Point, which is the perfect communism that the Jesuits want.

I already showed how everyone involved in the Corona crisis is related to the Jesuits and how the Jesuits themselves are a group of extreme anti-Semites. I'm not saying that there aren't evil Jews involved in the whole mess but there's still no point indulging so much in the Jewish World Domination plan thing when the Jesuits literally created those conspiracy theories. They own the lands of Israel so there's no danger of the Jews getting the holy land thing either. Believing that you can somehow oppose the CIA from an intellectual point of view by spreading CIA propaganda is just plain dumbassery. By knowing who the enemy is and how influential they are, you can start thinking about strategies to beat them. I mean again, I'm pretty sure the Jesuits downright control all the most relevant intelligence agencies in the world simultaneously and not only their control over the banking system is greater than the Roths, but they actually control the Rothschilds themselves either way. They simply have no rival group. Teilhard's influence in the capitalist societies and the Omega Point are also very well documented facts.

I think I already covered all the other relevant aspects behind the NWO and explained the reasons behind my policies in my sub.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 2

Are you stuck in the 1930's? Te CIA works with Mossad and tribal Jews often. The CIA had Rabbinate Jew directors. Dulles was a mason and a crypto-Jew. JFK, a Catholic, wanted to splinter his CIA, the unconventional pro-Mossad CIA, into a thousand pieces. JFK wanted a war veteran directed CIA. Not a detente CIA full of non-veterans and Zionists. The CIA is not anti-Jew and you conflate anti-Jew with anti-Zionism. The only anti-Zionists CIA officials are now retired authoring books.

I still don't know how you define "anti-Semites". There is a lot of intentional bullshit surrounding that term. There are legit folks who hate Jews. Some just despise Zionist actions. Some folks claim that criticizing the State Of Israel makes you anti-Semitic. Of course questioning the Holocaust, Hollywood, politicians, media, banksters, diamonds, secret agencies, military, etc etc etc gets you in hot water too - especially when you point out how many of this tiny global minority are in control.

I critique Jews on theology. In other words, their rabbinate talmudic religion is backwards, tribalist and immoral. Humanist Jews are another matter. But Jewish supremacism is a big deal and many times Jewish supremacism is an arm of political Zionism, though not always. When Jewish supremacism and Zionism are amalgamated, this powerful nepotistic group spreads ego and ethnocentrism, racism and destruction wherever it goes. I do not however, bade my critique on naturalist racial views like the Nazis and Zionist Jews do. That everything must be blood inclined.

Also, regardless of how much of a practical foothold (((they))) have, do you deny that there are legitimate "Jewish World Domination" plans out there?

They want workd domination, which is admited in th Talmud and the way in which they translate certain Torah verses and 40,000 Jews own upwards of 15 trillion while 217 million Americans own about 1 trillion while the other hundreds of millions have negative assets.

There really is no shortage of Jewish folks and Rabbis talking all kinds of shit that proves they have these plans and prophecies. Whether they can actually pull it off is another thing. And of course I know dozens of Jewish people who have nothing to do with any of that, from cousins to ex-lovers to bosses and employees. I know they are just normal people - unlike the ruling class who live by other rules (or without).

EXACTLY!

The Jesuits had a record of political subvertion and terrorist acts back when they were still the Knights Templar, but I suppose Loyola had the biggest influence when it comes to the modern Jesuits.

The Templars were never the Jesuits. And Jesuits were never the Templars. Also, why not look at Jewish terrorism? They demolished the towers.

Overall, Catholicism is a religion that has a rejection of the material world in favour of asceticism and worship of Christ, but I think Loyola took this to a whole new level.

Good, they promote God and rightful living as opposed to masonic naturalism or Jewish tribalism.

He had a spiritual experience trying to search for answers by practicing extreme ways of asceticism in a cave in the middle of nowhere and basically went insane and completely destroyed his personality in the process.

No, he found God. Turned from his ways of killing and founded the Jesuit society to spread the gospel.

I believe that's the origin of their policiy of radical supernaturalism.

Nope, it's not. Read an actual scholarly book on the history of the Jesuits.

They associate the supernatural with Christ himself and see the material world as a corruption that shouldn't exist.

It was created by God. Hence, man has free-will. Catholics don't see the world as a material corruption, but as a naturalist manifestation that must be subdued with Christ's teachings. You're thinking of gnostics and their hatred for the material world.

They also hate the Jews and nationalists as a whole for being a materialist group.

True, but they don't hate them. They want to save them. Nationalist Tribalism has caused destruction and authoritarianism like no other ideology, especially when relinquishing Christ's teachings.

One of their first crimes and foreshadowing of their insane ideas was the Jesuit Communist Empire in Latin America, which lasted over a hundred years and was the sign of trying to force their deranged monkery. But even that is not enough, they want a completely perfect communism.

Jesuits are NOT COMMUNIST. They wrote encyclicals speaking out against communism. Was the leader of Cuba a Jesuit? No, he was in fact a Talmudic Marrano Jew, self-admitted. You believe monkery and monasteries to be communist. If you are referring to Marranos, yes, they introduced communism into the Latin world.

The most relevant figures behind the globalist movement were Charles Darwin, Herbert Spencer, Andrew Carnegie, Cecil Rhodes, the Huxley family and H.G Wells and their Jesuit mentor Teilhard.

Telihard was more a fallen away Jesuit. And Darwin was a racial eugenicist which the Nazis and Jewish Zionists now worship, even if unknowingly.

I already showed how everyone involved in the Corona crisis is related to the Jesuits and how the Jesuits themselves are a group of extreme anti-Semites.

Wrong. Is Schwab a Jesuit? Nope, he is rabbinically Jewish.

I'm not saying that there aren't evil Jews involved in the whole mess but there's still no point indulging so much in the Jewish World Domination plan thing when the Jesuits literally created those conspiracy theories.

How come Jewish world dominion theories existed well before the Jesuit incorporation?

They own the lands of Israel so there's no danger of the Jews getting the holy land thing either.

They don't.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 1

I don't see how the government can be opposed at all without embracing the revolutionary aspect. Even if your movement starts gaining heat, the government will infiltrate it and destroy it. The only way to implement solutions without violence is starting society in the wild.

There's no such thing as a government. The US is a corporation centered in the District of Columbia. Your free to turn towards the woods, relinquish tacit contracts with the state and federal corporation and live self-sufficiently. What you want is a revolution, which is exactly what GRU and Mossad want in the US, which is being asset stripped as we speak by for-profit private corporations and think tanks.

Referencing the past I would agree. However, today we have much better communication tools and some of us are aware - and we need to share that awareness. Everyone should learn and be aware of not just the potential to be infiltrated but many of their tricks and tools of manipulation, deception, distraction, and division - among other things. By keeping everyone aware, obviously you must also temper them so they're not too paranoid and calling everyone a traitor. (I also temper myself by not calling you an "enemy" just because we have different ideas about who is at the top - thus I'm able to continue having constructive discussions seeking solutions.)

Agreed.

Further, IMO, we need to develop and promote fundamentals, like manifestos or constitutions or whatever, that lay out the basics clearly that cannot be deviated from. For example, I think FOTPACH is a good start (fair, open, transparent, peaceful, accountable, consistent, honest) for any and all management. Any management that cannot comply is fundamentally flawed and the people should demand better or at the very least be very skeptical.

How did men take control of the US and use their legalese to impose their will on others. George Washington exclaimed; "citizens are but Actors on a the most contingent Theatre." Washington and his comrades cared only about protecting THEIR assets and using think tanks and tribal in group thinking to do it. The Cincinnati society is an example of such. This tribalism is seen clearly with Zionist Jews and their think tanks who have basically asset stripped the US.

Starting society in the wild has pros and cons. The old society already has a head start and you'll have to catch up on EVERYTHING. Being isolated makes you an easy target to pick off quietly. It's expensive to get everything out there or to relocate if needed or in emergencies. Of course there are lots of benefits to having freedom. I'm 50/50 for toughing it out in the city or striking out in the wild. In 10 years we shall see who's doing better under the New Normal.

It won't have any pros in America. Bolsheviks want to destroy America, hence critical race theory in the US military. The goal is to destroy the US from within, eventually, when the multipolar world emerges and Israel can without consequence, make an alliance with China and Russia.

I'm worried about the level of discourse.

Because 'anti-Semitism,' obviously. Right?

How can conspiracists become a menace to the government when they can't even agree on who runs things?

Who cares who's at the top? They all suck: Jesuits, Vatican, Zionists, London Inc, Washington DC, B.I.S., Illumaniti, aliens, etc.

Corporations and billionaires are truly the rulers and they plan to use human capital in the technocracy age. Which is a Ronald Cohen idea. See Alice Mcdowell's wrenchinthegears blog or Elle Provocateurs twitter

The government is not at the top. Why menace them, with their monopoly on violence? Why not just "menace" and discredit the Jesuits or whoever above them? Or all of "authority"? Build a compelling case for your argument and convince people to join your crusade. It's true that you can't win/please everyone all the time - but in this case it's obvious that whatever you've been doing has limited efficacy, so you have work to do with your crusade's community.

Because Jesuits don't exist anymore.

Why not just develop good alternatives and solutions to resist by carving out our own freedom instead of challenging an illegitimate evil force with all the power?

That sounds better! Remember, citizenship is voluntary. Our systems run on faith. That's it. If everyone today said "I quit," and the middle and lower classes stopped paying their taxes, just wait and see how the house of cards falls. This sort of approach could set us back into a wild stage but more likely it will allow for more decentralized local projects to take hold—ridded of corporate capture.

My stand is that the Jesuits are the most powerful group in the NWO by a long margin, with them controlling all, or at least the most relevant intelligence agencies.

They're not.

Yes, we get that. But how and why and to what end? We all know about the rise of Israel, their lame excuses, and their professed goals and ambitions and prophecies.

If Jesuits didn't like Zionists and Jews, if they exposed Talmudic supremacy and Jewish tribalism why would they 'own Israel' and allow Zionist Jews to kill Palestinian Christians or have the Israel government maintain Jewish majority rule and make spreading the gospel illegal, when Jesuits spread the gospel throughout the world? Sounds like today's Jesuits are anything but Jesuits. Sounds like they're marrano Jews.

I propose to you, that you draft up 3 posts in a series - about the historical rise of Jesuits, why they're doing it, and what their end goals are - but I have one caveat: You write it out to be as clear as possible for newb readers, WITHOUT using any links or citations. Consider these your ultimate benchmark explanations. Obviously you can link information in the comment section when people ask for evidence or specific details - but do NOT write the OP with the understanding that you will link to it later. Feel free to reference this "linkless overview challenge". Also, message me so I can immediately updoot it. It will be good or you'll hear about it from me or others in the comments, but I won't take away my votes.

Sounds interesting. I'll advise hibs to read Christopher Hollis's History of the Jesuits book.

And they are a group of anti-Semites, so getting too obsessed with the Jewish World Domination theories is counterproductive. They are literally Jesuit/CIA propaganda either way, like I documented.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

/u/jasoncarsell

Using the "nationalist revolution" freemasonic trademark in the incorporation of the grand orient continental lodge are we now hibikiblack

This rite is an incorporation of the grand orient continental lodge as a way to destroy the last vestige of Christian morality.

Whether hibikiblack knows it or not, he is aiding and abetting Zionist Jews, Chabad supremacism, Jewish tribalism and masonry. In fact, you won't find one negative thing he has to say about these groups, except to downplay their crimes.

The same Vatican, despite it's Talmudic infiltrators, that stood up against the Iraq war and was defamed by Zionist Jew owned media, hibikiblack thinks should be destroyed. Sounds very Elders of Zion hibs.

Hibikiblack, the dialectical materialist that thinks Jesus never existed, wants to end the one institution that stood up against the Synagogue of Satan because Jewish tribalism is good. He is likely a Jew and/or a Zionist and very pro-Jewish tribalism.

Who did 9/11, Hibiki?

Jewish Naturalism is opposition to the mystical body of Christ. Masons want to end the supernaturalism in society and replace it with a federated republic.

Official Bulletin Grand Lodge of France, 1922:

My Brothers... allow me to express the hope that Freemasonry, which has done so much for the emancipation of the human race and to which history is indebted to NATIONAL REVOLUTIONS, will also be able to bring about the greater revolution [which hibs wants], which is the international revolution

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I make anti-Zionist posts the whole time. And nationalism is the natural state of humans.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

He can't because according to him the Syrians and Jews will kill each other off and only Americans can be blamed for their 'anti-Semitism'.

Anyone using that canard is a crypto-Zionist.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

As if Syrians and Jews only live in the Middle East. Yes many do, but both tribes have relatives and descendants around the world. (I dated a Naturopath Doctor in Seattle and she was half Syrian half Palestinian.) And ultimately, on the bright side of war, there's never been one that killed off everyone, try as hard as they might.

Anyone using that canard is a crypto-Zionist.

But he can't even admit it.

Not sure how "crypto" he is.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You don't explain anything. You source half-baked conspiratorial theories blaming everything on Jesuits and the occult in generalizations and using indirect relations, such as if a person attended a Jesuit public university that would make them a part of some black pope conspiracy.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Let's see if I can make this simple...

The Vatican is a Jesuit controlled institution.

There's a bunch of records of the CIA doing operations that benefit the Vatican.

The Jesuits, as I have recorded, are the most anti-Semitic group on earth.

Despite there being records of Jews taking relevant positions of power in the CIA, the Jesuits have a background of manipulating Jewish groups by the thousands in order to use them as deflector shields, and the amount of Catholic leaders in the CIA is far greater than the ones who were Jewish.

The Jesuits control the CIA and Jews themselves are discriminated against in it even today.

Ergo, the CIA is an anti-Semitic organization.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

/u/hibikiblack

Part 4

Yes, they say they go to Church but they're cyrpto-Jews. The Vatican is in fact a crypto-Jewish organization since its takeover.

Knights of Malta membership list including David Rockefeller, Amschel Mayer von Rothschild, Allen Dulles and more. David Rockefeller on population control and depopulation.

Wrong, you're thinking of the Knights of Malta masonic organization, which the real Catholic church condemned. There are two knights of Maltas. A Catholic group and masonic group. Rockefeller comes from the Rockefellos family in Russia who in the 15th century were hated for their monopoly of the wheat industry. In the book, the Sephardi Elite, the Rockefellers are a Jewish family. They are Jews.

The Rockefeller Foundation created the WHO & funds U.S. Public Health.

Yes, and a communist also helped to create the WHO, but the Rockefellers are plutocratic Jews.

How Rockefeller wiped out natural cures to create the big pharma cartel.

Indeed.

John D. Rockefeller’s 1882 Organization of the Standard Oil Trust the First in the Commercial History of the World Was Modeled After the Jesuit Order from First-Hand Contact with Mexican Jesuits.

Wrong. This is a fallacy pushed by the supremacist Jewish pundits of the Jesuits are the synagogue of satan theory. Accusations include that Hitler was a Jesuit or that a Jesuit wrote Mein Kampf, which I debunked in its entirety in a post on one of your subs, which you censored and then banned me! The correct reason is that organizations took the Jesuit brotherly love and incorporation structure due to their loyalty to their rules and Christ and made it their own. That does not mean that those who took inspiration from Jesuit structures were Jesuits who worshipped Christ. It is like claiming Weishaupt, the Jewish member of the Bavarian Illuminati, among other Jewish members, were actually blue lodge masons, because Weishaupt infiltrated and stole masonic rites for his order from this lodge. Really, he infiltrated and subverted one type of lodge for another, that of the parasitical book masonry which is Jewish Scottish rite among others who do not order members to withhold from political machinations.

Connection Between the Rockefeller Foundation, Johns Hopkins, and Gates Foundations.

All plutocratic Jews.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, point man on coronavirus, is a {Jesuit}Holy Cross alum", Boston-Globe, March 17th 2020. Mullis PCR inventor talking about Anthony Fauci. The CDC’s swine Flu Fraude of 1976.

Fauci is an Abys, his grandmother came from Switzerland. He is a Jew of Italian-Swiss ancestry and his ancestry on his mother's side is of rabbinical Jews. Going to a Jesuit university such as Hollycross, which is public to anyone, my relatve went there, does not make you a Jesuit.

Pfizer to pay $2.3 billion, agrees to criminal plea. (Reuters 2009) Big Pharma fined around $14 Billion in 5 years.

Pfizer is Jewish Zionist owned.

LMAO at this. Can you explain to me how is the Greater Israel theory plausible after finding out that the Roths are a group of Jewish traitors in service to the Vatican and that the Vatican owns the lands of Israel?

They don't own Israel. Israel LLC is owned by Jews who own the Israel corporation. Which in its constitution ie., in company rules, maintains that a Jewish majority must always be maintained. I'd be more worried about Bennet and the Yinon revisionist Zionists who did 9/11 and want to implement a Greater Israel either with help from the US and if not, than help from a multilateral world once the US collapses or loses its empire status. It's an ongoing agenda.

With the Jesuits being the downright most anti-Semitic group on earth?

Do you mean anti-Jew(ish)? Anti-Semitism is a misnomer. The most prolific anti-Semitic groups on the planet, if we can even use that word in its demented meaning, are the Likudniks and Khazarian converted plutocratic Jews, ie., the Ashkenazi mafia who blamed 9/11 on Palestinians and Arabs! But if I'm anti-Semitic or if the Jesuits were, that makes then opposed to Hebrew and Arabic languages, lol. The word makes no sense. Sure Christians will always be opposed to Islam and rabbinism which is in fact anti-Judaism as the only true Jew, really we should call him the only true Judahite Hebrew, being perfect in God's eyes, was Christ, whose new covenant supersedes the old, making it obsolete. If you must, call Catholic Jesuits anti-Judaic, which they're not! Think for a second! Many former Jews were members of the incorporation of the Jesuit order, the majority were gentiles. But they considered themselves former Jews only by ancestry, or practiced Judaism at one point in time but truthfully converted to Christianity. Marranos, however, were Jews pretending to be Christians to destroy the church. And I will not deny that there was Jewish persecution by certain crusaders, which only helped to increase Jesuit infiltration.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

/u/hibikiblack

Part 3

Furthermore, the royal houses of Britain saw the machinations, division and blackmail of aristocracy. There was competing factors here as well, all of course contrary to the welfare of the plebeians and rural class.

Secondly, Plutocratic Jews are often tribal and nepotistic. But this isn't the case for most anti-Zionist humanist Jews who number far fewer. Whilst they don't profess Christ, they often see Him as someone to follow in an atheistical humanist way. This, off course, can at times, devolve into demoralization or the erasure of Christian principals concerning sex, property and family but this is a small problem due to the fact that their Jewish Zionist opposition, those Zionist racial blood-inclined plutocratic Jews and their neo-Trotskyites, despite preaching the necessity of family and motherly nurture to their own ideologues, work to destroy these principals in non-Jewish cultures.

The Rothschilds were sold out to us as the biggest Ultra-Zionist group out there, but I already showed you how they are a bunch of traitors.

It would be best you tell them to stop funding orthodox Jewish rabbinates and propping up Jewish agency organizations around the world. They are Jewish philanthropists for Jews and only Jews. Anyone who wants to know if the Vatican is Catholic or Talmudic might want to search mauricepinay.blogspot.com, callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com or search their twitters: @mauricepinay and @hereisjorge. They give detailed accounts of the judaic takeover of the Catholic church and Jesuitism. The church is entirely controlled by Bergoglio whose mother was Jewish and her grandmother was Jewish. He is rabbinically Jewish and praises Talmudists who hate Christ and has in his office a depraved painting of Jesus with the talmudic rabbinate inscription, 'blot out his name.' Provably, Bergoglio is fronting the Noahide agenda which is Jewish supremacy, NOT CATHOLIC.

They even allowed the Vatican to get the lands of Israel, the Jesuits the most anti-Semitic group on earth.

Because the Vatican is Talmudically controlled, duh! Of course, your claim isn't true but what would it matter either way? Israel is a Jewish theocracy, allowing secular Jewish degeneracy as long as the Jews remain tribal and ethnonationalistic, hence Tel Aviv being the gayest city in the world, surpassing San Francisco. Yet, simultaneously, all Jews in Israel have to serve in the terrorist Israeli Defense Forces and you concurrently have theocratic Zionist orthodox hassidic Jews directing the IDF who have publicly proclaimed that in Talmudic law raping non-Jews in a time of strife or war by Jewish soldiers is noble in order to benefice the fighting ability of the Jewish soldier by satisfying his sexual thirst.

How can a Zionist Jew in California bomb and kill a Palestinian in California while he is sleeping in his camper (yup, this happened), flee to Israel and then become a prominent member of the Knesset and a lawyer who has the Chutzpah to publicly defame war criminal Netanyahu and sue him multiple times. Just think of how depraved and odd this is, Jewish supremacist kabuki theater on a level that one just has to shake his/her head in disbelief.

I don't respect the Greater Israel narratives at all they are the same old stories that they pushed in Europe.

Because they're true and not an ideology of all Jews.

All the Jews that you keep seeing in positions of power? Well they got thousands of Jews in power during the Bolshevik revolution and the whole movement was in great part the black pope play to frame the Jews.

No it wasn't. No evidence exists for this, tens of thousands of Catholics were liquidated and Jesuits openly wrote encyclicals against the formation of communism in Russia.

Why are the Jews discriminated against and researched in the CIA when some ethnic Jews have taken positions of power in the past?

They're not. Not anymore at least.

Because It's another shitty Hegelian Dialectic they set up.

No, it's not. And why do you always conflate Jews with tribalistic ethnonationalist Jews, as if that's the only Jewish ideology?

Fitzinfo's fallacy of the Jesuit conspiracy, see here proves your theories wrong.

Also, considering you call yourself an SS member on reddit and the fact that you now post about muslim rape gangs, hate the CIA but negate to admit that there are two CIA's who were opposed to each other; source freemasons and Jews who proclaim that JFK faked his death; hate Christ and Catholicism; call me a "CIA fuck," I'd wager your useless_aether or working with him. Both you and him sourced Loftus, the Jewish Zionist and various other Zionists. So my idea of you is that you proclaim ethnonationalist Judaism or at least work for its benefit because it might benefit your own ethnonationalism.

Secondly, the Vatican vaccination mandate for a terrible disease 200 years ago is not in anyway connected to the vaccines being mandated by Israeli Jews.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is a Jesuit Missionary Congregation.

No, wrong. Gates are Goetz who are openly Jewish and Melinda praised Chabad. Jesuits would never praise Chabad.

Bill Gates Reveals Family Goes to Catholic Church. Bill Gates: "People act like they have a choice.You don't have a choice. Normalcy only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population.”

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

/u/hibikiblack

Part 2

Take in point, rabbi Dov Zakheim. He is an ordained Orthodox Jew of the hassidic chabad-Lubavitch sect which works a lot like Christianity in regards to their proselytizing efforts. That is, they work with their wealth to proselytize all Jews AND NON-JEWS to the cult of noahide. Though, they believe that those who worship Jesus is blasphemous and that their noachide laws call for their beheading. How nice! Certainly this can be observed as naturalistically internationalist and simultaneously tribal. I know what the noachide laws and world rule from Jerusalem entails. Do you?

As to Dov’s hell-raiser lineage, Judicial Inc points out that Grandpa Zakheim was born in 1870, Julius Zakheim (Zhabinka), in the Ukraine, a Russian rabbi who married a relative of Karl Marx! Yes, the founder of communism who was a cousin of a Rothschild. In fact, Zakheim admits to his Rothschild and Schneerson ancestry. The claim that this 'good American' Zakheim, who was a suspect in the 9/11 events, was nationalistic and anti-communist is a misnomer. For plutocratic Jews shape-shift for political expediency. So here is Zakheim's grandpa who was a Menshevik/Bolshevik and played a leading role in the 1905 turmoil that paved the way for the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution.

Now consider the Bolshevik master plan, which called for the state of Israel, only after the realized that they might lose control of Russia, which was chosen for its proximity to the world's oil and an area of religious significance.

Dov’s Father, Rabbi Jacob I. Zakheim was born in 1910 and reared in Poland’s swarm of Zionist hard guys, read assassins and bombers. His Polish town, near Bilaystok, also brought us Yitzhak Shir, and family friends included Jewish terrorist Menachem Begin and Moshe Arens. Dov’s father was an active member of Betar, formed in 1923 in Riga, Latvia. Its goal was to control the Middle East (and its oil). It was advocated by many wealthy Jews that the Jewish people needed their own country and they chose Palestine and claimed it a Jewish state “on both sides of the Jordan.”

Betar was in essence a terrorist organization formed because Zionists were sick of being chased from and arrested in country after country. They wanted both a place to escape and a base for their power, which is now Israel llc.

Betar joined forces with the Haganah, Irgun, and Stern gangs. With no prospect of a Jewish state in sight, they argued that armed struggle against the British was the only way. Since Britain occupied Palestine and was containing them they went on a blood feast of bombings that killed hundreds of British soldiers. The British pulled out, but the Zionists continue to maul the Arabs to this day.

For an interesting look at “The United States and the Recognition of Israel: A Chronology” compiled from Harry S. Truman and the Founding of Israel by Michael T. Benson, link above.

Returning to Dov: he was born in Brooklyn in 1943 and attended exclusive Jewish schools, spent summers in Israel Zionist camps, which trained the Zionists of the future. From 1973 to 75, he attended the London school of Jewish studies, described as a “Harry Potter” type cauldron; among the subjects Jewish supremacy, Advanced Bible, Talmud, Jewish Mysticism, Holocaust, Anglo-Judaica, and Zionism. After, he was ordained a Rabbi.

So, here we see connections between Zionist Jews and Bolshevik Jews. The motif here is Jewish tribalist ethnonationalism and when they didn't have a nation, Jewish tribalism at the expense of non-Jews.