you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The orbital inclination necessary to get good coverage at that latitude vs. the payoff of higher res imagery isn't worth it. Go to any other region at that latitude and zoom in and you also won't see the same meter-level resolution as you do on the rest of the maps. Smaller, higher-res segments are from scientific satellites that monitor regions of ice they're studying and shit.

This thread is retarded and you're grasping.

[–]letsgobish29[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

they're literally completely different images pasted on top that match nothing nearby, not different resolution. yeah man, the orbital inclination is too hard.. oh but wait how to explain the fact that some of the map isn't blurred out or edited.. oh right, well the science satellites, they defy the orbital inclination on those occasions! but they only give snippets to google earth for reasons. trust the science!

guess what you stupid fuck, it didn't used to be so blurry at all: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/google-earth-antarctica-find-blurred-16879315

holy fuck people on this forum are stupid. you're like a bunch of redditors.. 'well ackshually this is the official explanation and i will never question it even though it's as clear as day that it's wrong with obvious logical holes'.

[–]VirgilGriff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Holy fuck you're retarded.

What you're calling blurred-out images are just regions that have lower resolution data available.

They appear to not match because you'll looking at a 1m resolution map placed next to a 100m resolution area, taken months or years apart.

[–]letsgobish29[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

nobody can click on the links I posted in the OP and say that with a straight face. stop wasting my time with your crap.

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

And yet I did. I'm telling you what it shows. Have you ever zoomed in on a map in a normal area and noticed the seams between two regions, obviously taken at different times and different resolutions? Satellites don't take a photo of the entire earth all at once. That doesn't mean there's a government conspiracy to cover something up. That should be the very last explanation you resort to, and it requires tons of other evidence. Not "I was fucking around on Google Maps and I just uncovered a massive conspiracy that goes all the way to the top. This is the big one, folks. This random fucking area in Antarctica is where it's all going down."

[–]letsgobish29[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

stop wasting my time with your bullshit. as i already said, they're not even close. it's not a corresponding image patched together, they're fucking completely diff areas and anybody can see that you idiot.

[–]VirgilGriff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I didn't say they were close.

Are you even reading what I'm writing?

Are you fucking retarded? Just tell me if you're retarded and I'll stop trying to treat you like a fully functioning adult, attempting to use logic and reason with you.

[–]skeeter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am retarded and I am running for prsendit.

Skeeter 2420