you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

The orbital inclination necessary to get good coverage at that latitude vs. the payoff of higher res imagery isn't worth it. Go to any other region at that latitude and zoom in and you also won't see the same meter-level resolution as you do on the rest of the maps. Smaller, higher-res segments are from scientific satellites that monitor regions of ice they're studying and shit.

This thread is retarded and you're grasping.

[–]letsgobish29[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

they're literally completely different images pasted on top that match nothing nearby, not different resolution. yeah man, the orbital inclination is too hard.. oh but wait how to explain the fact that some of the map isn't blurred out or edited.. oh right, well the science satellites, they defy the orbital inclination on those occasions! but they only give snippets to google earth for reasons. trust the science!

guess what you stupid fuck, it didn't used to be so blurry at all: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/google-earth-antarctica-find-blurred-16879315

holy fuck people on this forum are stupid. you're like a bunch of redditors.. 'well ackshually this is the official explanation and i will never question it even though it's as clear as day that it's wrong with obvious logical holes'.

[–]VirgilGriff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Holy fuck you're retarded.

What you're calling blurred-out images are just regions that have lower resolution data available.

They appear to not match because you'll looking at a 1m resolution map placed next to a 100m resolution area, taken months or years apart.

[–]letsgobish29[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

nobody can click on the links I posted in the OP and say that with a straight face. stop wasting my time with your crap.

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

And yet I did. I'm telling you what it shows. Have you ever zoomed in on a map in a normal area and noticed the seams between two regions, obviously taken at different times and different resolutions? Satellites don't take a photo of the entire earth all at once. That doesn't mean there's a government conspiracy to cover something up. That should be the very last explanation you resort to, and it requires tons of other evidence. Not "I was fucking around on Google Maps and I just uncovered a massive conspiracy that goes all the way to the top. This is the big one, folks. This random fucking area in Antarctica is where it's all going down."

[–]letsgobish29[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

stop wasting my time with your bullshit. as i already said, they're not even close. it's not a corresponding image patched together, they're fucking completely diff areas and anybody can see that you idiot.

[–]VirgilGriff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I didn't say they were close.

Are you even reading what I'm writing?

Are you fucking retarded? Just tell me if you're retarded and I'll stop trying to treat you like a fully functioning adult, attempting to use logic and reason with you.

[–]skeeter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am retarded and I am running for prsendit.

Skeeter 2420

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Interesting pyramid, but the question of what the actual explanation is remains.

It's pretty unlikely to be the entrance to hollow earth, reveal the infinite ice plain, or show alien artifacts. Most likely is military and/or scientific ops of some sort. Maybe the pyramid is from the previous earth catastrophe cycle? Being so close to the next turnover would be a pretty awkward time to have evidence revealed.

It would help to research the orbital paths of the satellites used to do the imaging google uses, as well as all satellites that overfly that region. Do 'google satellites' overfly that area or not? And if they do, what does it cost to image a given area? Is there "no cost justification", or would it "cost little extra" to upload all that data, since it's already there?

Who else overflies the antarctic? What kinds of imaging do they do? Is it available online? Does it reveal useful data? Can I purchase custom imaging from satellite operators? These are some of the questions a researcher might pursue.

Hey, maybe this is one of those military ops where they're monitoring this post, and have already IDed both of us in real life. Oh shit, has your local fusion center gone on alert too?