you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

There's more evidence about Catholic groups infiltrating Jewish groups and corrupting them from within than the opposite happening... A lot of these theories about a crypto Jewish infiltration of the Catholic Church run on the idea that the Jesuits themselves are somehow telling us the truth...

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

WRONG, you're the guy who sources IDF disinformation agents and Masons.

All my posts show clear evidence of Jew control, of desecration and blotting out of Jesus's name in the rabinical tradition... but then again, you don't believe Jesus existed. Typical Jew.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

There's tons of evidence about the Jezzies putting Jews in power on purpose just to divert attention away from their crimes. Even if Francis turned out to be Jewish I wouldn't be all that surprised.

You did well at pointing out that John wasn't a neutral source BTW, a lot of people simply pointed me at his book when it comes to Israel and the CIA.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Jesuits are Christians. They preached the gospel across the globe. Set up monasteries to help and care for lepers and the sick and taught natives trades that kings were sternly against due to their perceived backwardness.

For that reason, modern Jesuits are not Jesuits. Bergoglio is Jewish, and a Marrano... Pharisees/symagogue of Satan who sought to infiltrate the Church.

Blotting out Jesus's name, which Francis appears to accept, is a rabbinate 'Jewish' tradition.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Jesuits don't actually follow the teachings of Christ. Jesus tried to preserve the values of the old testament and was against several "Jewish" groups in his time and was persecutted and killed for it. I suppose they are more closely related to Loyola himself, that probably ended up completely destroying his personality while seeking answers in that cave.

Radical supernaturalism is against what Jesus taught and from an ethical point of view is simply giving up on the human condition.

Yes, I suppose I do fit a lot more in the "materialist" side of the spectrum, but then again, why should I give my love to a God that obviously doesn't care about me and probably doesn't exist? God didn't make me cunning enough to survive, my own fights made me strong for it. I can't be spiritually satisfied until I get a result where people around me are happy. Ironically, despite my disdain for the gods, I'm pretty sure this is a lot closer to what Jesus supposedly taught.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Jesuits don't actually follow the teachings of Christ.

Yes, they do. Many Jesuits followed Christ and helped the weak, the sick and the hungry; something our Judeo-masonic republics founded by Young societies are neutral on, or worse, against.

Jesus tried to preserve the values of the old testament and was against several "Jewish" groups in his time and was persecutted and killed for it.

No Jews existed in His time.

No, he didn't. His sacrafice superceded the old covenant where God says plainly that the OLD would become obsolete and wither away. The old was a means to follow Him and He fufilled it.

He fufilled the law through his sacrifice. Faith is the law which breeds good works. But of course you wouldn't believe that because you spew Synagogue of Satan propaganda and believe Jesus was a myth. Yet here you are preaching as if you know Him, yet reject Him.

suppose they are more closely related to Loyola himself, that probably ended up completely destroying his personality while seeking answers in that cave.

Blah, blah. He did this to know and seek God earnestly. His group went onto preach the Gospel to the world and converted many and set up monasteries that cared for the weak, sick, hungry and poor.

Radical supernaturalism is against what Jesus taught and from an ethical point of view is simply giving up on the human condition.

Wrong, radical supernaturalism, something you deny, just like you deny Christ; is what Jesus taught. For only THROUGH ME can you KNOW the Father. We believe unto Him his sacrafice and through faith in God through the works of Christ, ie., faith, ie., supernaturalism ie., knowing Him; we live our lives in accordance to His teachings.

Yes, I suppose I do fit a lot more in the "materialist" side of the spectrum, but then again, why should I give my love to a God that obviously doesn't care about me and probably doesn't exist?

Don't preach to me as a dialectical-materialist. Christ is lord and savior. We are all children of God. He gave us free-will through the Fall, and we must follow Him.

God didn't make me cunning enough to survive, my own fights made me strong for it. I can't be spiritually satisfied until I get a result where people around me are happy.

Becuase you reject faith through action.

Ironically, despite my disdain for the gods, I'm pretty sure this is a lot closer to what Jesus supposedly taught.

No.