you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Zionists are sure to say...

We have the highest IQ and you Christians worship a Jew.

The former is sociopathic and nepotistic self-absorbtion, the latter, is a lie to get Christians to support counterfeit Israel with of course, 'Jewish' establishement money.

[–]mahavishnunj 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

they might also respond without rampant spelling mistakes like every single one of your posts. or they could respond with,'you are spouting nonsense about a guy who never existed and a book that is total nonsense'. but we know whats really going on with all of your posts right? wink wink

(if anyone wants to do the 'but punctuation'. as ive said before, i dont do that with shills, bots, morons.)

[–]YJaewedwqewq 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Your "people" worship cows and shit in the street. The fact that you call the Bible (and Christ) fiction when secular historians have repeatedly proven the validity of both the existence of Christ and the accuracy of multiple events described in the Bible is laughable. Especially when your religion espouses that a 6-armed, elephant-headed blue guy with 3 eyes will reincarnate you as a houseplant if you touch a poor person.

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Your "people" worship cows and shit in the street.

my people? im a white guy in the southern US you dumb fuck!

The fact that you call the Bible (and Christ) fiction when secular historians have repeatedly proven the validity of both the existence of Christ

show me. then i will show you how ridiculous that is. hint: you wont be able to.

Especially when your religion espouses that a 6-armed, elephant-headed blue guy with 3 eyes will reincarnate you as a houseplant if you touch a poor person.

again, im not religious. that is for morons like yourself.

[–]YJaewedwqewq 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

my people? im a white guy in the southern US you dumb fuck!

Are you not the hindu cowfucker that was shilling here and elsewhere not long ago? Your names are strikingly similar.

show me. then i will show you how ridiculous that is. hint: you wont be able to.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/14/what-is-the-historical-evidence-that-jesus-christ-lived-and-died

https://www.history.com/news/was-jesus-real-historical-evidence

I could provide much more. Of course, you'll "refute" any evidence offered by sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming buzzwords and trying your hardest to ignore it, like all you halfwits do.

again, im not religious. that is for morons like yourself.

Go back to plebbit. "Enlightened" atheists such as yourself are incredibly cringe and you don't convicne anyone of your cancerous anti-theist idoelogy. There is no point in your commenting.

[–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Are you not the hindu cowfucker that was shilling here and elsewhere not long ago? Your names are strikingly similar.

what an amazing start. idiotic enough to not even know what my username means, or remember that im a white dude in the deep south. so great, lol.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/14/what-is-the-historical-evidence-that-jesus-christ-lived-and-died

https://www.history.com/news/was-jesus-real-historical-evidence

I could provide much more. Of course, you'll "refute" any evidence offered by sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming buzzwords and trying your hardest to ignore it, like all you halfwits do.

++++++++++++++

heres from some of your own 'sources' dumb dumb. and no, you cannot provide 'much more' that wont be decimated just like this weak shit. i know reading is difficult for you, but attempt to understand this(im in bold, that may already prove too difficult for you):

"Biblical scholar Frederick Fyvie Bruce says the earliest mention of Jesus outside the New Testament occurs around 55 CE from a historian named Thallos. Thallos' history, like the vast majority of ancient literature, has been lost but not before it was quoted by Sextus Julius Africanus (ca.160-ca.240 CE), a Christian writer, in his History of the World (ca.220). This book likewise was lost, but not before one of its citations of Thallos was taken up by the Byzantine historian Georgius Syncellus in his Chronicle (ca.800). There is no means by which certainty can be established concerning this or any of the other lost references"

"Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews, written around 93–94 AD, includes two references to the biblical Jesus Christ in Books 18 and 20. The general scholarly view is that while the longer passage, known as the Testimonium Flavianum, is most likely not authentic in its entirety, it is broadly agreed upon that it originally consisted of an authentic nucleus, which was then subject to Christian interpolation.[54][55] Of the other mention in Josephus, Josephus scholar Louis H. Feldman has stated that "few have doubted the genuineness" of Josephus' reference to Jesus in Antiquities 20, 9, 1 ("the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James"). Paul references meeting and interacting with James, Jesus' brother, and since this agreement between the different sources supports Josephus' statement, the statement is only disputed by a small number of scholars."

LOL!! REALLY? ok, we'll go on with the nonsense...

"Roman historian Tacitus referred to Christus and his execution by Pontius Pilate in his Annals (written c. AD 116)"

this is the ONLY semi legitimate mention of 'jesus'. notice the date there. need i say more?

"There is only one classical writer who refers positively to Jesus and that is Mara bar Serapion, a Syriac Stoic, who wrote a letter to his son, who was also named Serapion, from a Roman prison. He speaks of Jesus as ‘the wise king’ and compares his death at the hand of the Jews to that of Socrates at the hands of the Athenians. He links the death of the ‘wise king’ to the Jews being driven from their kingdom. He also states that the ‘wise king’ lives on because of the “new laws he laid down.” The dating of the letter is disputed but was probably soon after 73 AD."

again, 2nd/3rd/4th hand information that at its EARLIEST was written nearly 100 years after this guy supposedly existed.

theres your 'proof'.

"Enlightened" atheists such as yourself are incredibly cringe and you don't convicne anyone of your cancerous anti-theist idoelogy. There is no point in your commenting.

im not even atheist dumbshit. the point of my commenting is to expose absolute morons, which ive just done here. but please bring on more, its fun.

EDIT: i can help you with some of the bigger words in there since you obviously cant even process what your own sources are saying.

[–]YJaewedwqewq 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

again, 2nd/3rd/4th hand information that at its EARLIEST was written nearly 100 years after this guy supposedly existed.

Damn, I guess plenty of major historical events didn't happen either.

Writing about something 50-70 years after it happened would imply that at the very least a similar event happened and that such an event was treated with some reverence.

It's not as if we have the entirety of the documents from that era. If in 2000 years time records were found speaking of two world-consuming conflicts only 30 years apart but found no direct sources, would they be correct to dismiss it as fictional? No, and your artificially inflated burden of proof to "own le christcucks" is equally laughable.

im not even atheist dumbshit. the point of my commenting is to expose absolute morons, which ive just done here. but please bring on more, its fun.

"Religion is for stupid people!" "The Bible and Christ are fairy tales!" lol yeah, I'm sure you're a theist, faggot.

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Damn, I guess plenty of major historical events didn't happen either.

i guess a dude lived in a whale and noah lived to 1000 yrs old and gathered 2 of every animal on earth. of course there are a few things in that dumb book that allude to real shit, thats how writing works. are you really this dense or just trolling at this point?

Writing about something 50-70 years after it happened would imply that at the very least a similar event happened and that such an event was treated with some reverence.

not what happened, as pointed out in my decimation of your own sources. ok, youre just trolling at this point.

It's not as if we have the entirety of the documents from that era.

we have the dead sea scrolls. which show how raped and bastardized the translations of even the stupid bible shit became. which you are basing your entire idiotic arguments on apparently. you cannot be this dumb....but wait, theres more!

If in 2000 years time records were found speaking of two world-consuming conflicts only 30 years apart but found no direct sources, would they be correct to dismiss it as fictional? No, and your artificially inflated burden of proof to "own le christcucks" is equally laughable.

wow. what a response. fuck i cant even come up with a funny one for this. did you read this before you typed it?

"Religion is for stupid people!" "The Bible and Christ are fairy tales!" lol yeah, I'm sure you're a theist, faggot.

ok, you got me. ive been trolled. but it was kinda fun while it lasted. if you are real, holy shit. surely not.