The term "Jew” falsely represents the tribe of Judea/Judahite Hebrews as well as a term people use falsely to describe all tribes. The term Jew has been hijacked to muddy the water and makes those who hijacked it seem Hebrew so they could steal Palestine.

submitted by Jesus from self.conspiracy

Therefore, today the term Jew does NOT represent a person from the tribe of Judah nor are they Judahite Hebrews, as Jesus was one.

Hence we’re saying Jesus was NOT a Jew. He was a Judahite. All the other Hebrew Tribes had their own names, but they’re commonly referred to as Hebrews or Israelites. The Judahites were also Hebrews, hence Judahite Hebrews.

Today, Jews are those who converted to Pharisaism/Judaism.

The fact that the Judahites killed Jesus is a HISTORICAL fact that many Christians for some strange reason don’t like to hear.

We suspect Zionist-compromised preachers have been brainwashing the flock to get those today who call themselves Jews “out of the hook” of killing Jesus, while these Jewish impostors, who are pretending to be Hebrews, get to keep their “chosen people” status. In other words, they want the benefit of being seen as something they’re not, without the guilt (i.e., they want to have their cake and eat it too).

Still, the Judahite Hebrews killed Jesus, not Jews... which must be a relief for so-called 'Jews' who are really people of all stripes who are converts to anti-Christ Rabbinism and Ashkenazi and Sephardi culture but don't let that stop them from gloating about hwo they killed Him and hate Him.

So, Jews...

https://biblicisminstitute.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/judeans.jpg?w=300&h=180

..are not Judeans who killed Christ but Zionist rabbinist converts to Pharisaism who stole the Judahite Hebrew identity gloat about it anyway so they can trick Christians into stealing Palestine. How nice!

All the promises, they’ve already been fulfilled in the person of Jesus Christ. That’s why Jesus sent the Apostles to the Tribes of Israel, first, and then to the rest of the world.

“salvation to everyone who believes: first to the Judahite, then to the Gentile.” Romans 1:16

Further, there weren’t just blessings in the Law, there were also curses in store for the Tribes for their disobedience – everyone overlooks those.

Then, Jesus rewrote the Law and the promises. Everything from the Old Covenant has to be filtered now through the New, as the Old covenant became obsolete along with all so-called promises that people read into them and which no longer apply since they’re already fulfilled.

“By calling this covenant ‘new,’ he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete is outdated.” Hebrews 8:13

OBSOLETE = DONE, NO MORE, FINITO. And that goes also for all the so-called “promises” that people misunderstand and take out of context.

Even the name of the gene tells you it’s fake. J-1? Jewish #1? Besides what’s a Jew gene? Judaism is a religion not a race. An Ashkenazi gene, perhaps. So what? An Ashkenazi Jewish gene is NOT a Hebrew gene. Remember Jesus was NOT an Ashkenazi Jew, but a Judahite Hebrew.

A good verse for your friends and for you:

“There is neither Judahite nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all ONE in Christ Jesus.” Galatians 3: 28

God bless. May He open your eyes!

all 26 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Jesus[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Zionists are sure to say...

We have the highest IQ and you Christians worship a Jew.

The former is sociopathic and nepotistic self-absorbtion, the latter, is a lie to get Christians to support counterfeit Israel with of course, 'Jewish' establishement money.

[–]mahavishnunj 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

they might also respond without rampant spelling mistakes like every single one of your posts. or they could respond with,'you are spouting nonsense about a guy who never existed and a book that is total nonsense'. but we know whats really going on with all of your posts right? wink wink

(if anyone wants to do the 'but punctuation'. as ive said before, i dont do that with shills, bots, morons.)

[–]YJaewedwqewq 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Your "people" worship cows and shit in the street. The fact that you call the Bible (and Christ) fiction when secular historians have repeatedly proven the validity of both the existence of Christ and the accuracy of multiple events described in the Bible is laughable. Especially when your religion espouses that a 6-armed, elephant-headed blue guy with 3 eyes will reincarnate you as a houseplant if you touch a poor person.

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Your "people" worship cows and shit in the street.

my people? im a white guy in the southern US you dumb fuck!

The fact that you call the Bible (and Christ) fiction when secular historians have repeatedly proven the validity of both the existence of Christ

show me. then i will show you how ridiculous that is. hint: you wont be able to.

Especially when your religion espouses that a 6-armed, elephant-headed blue guy with 3 eyes will reincarnate you as a houseplant if you touch a poor person.

again, im not religious. that is for morons like yourself.

[–]YJaewedwqewq 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

my people? im a white guy in the southern US you dumb fuck!

Are you not the hindu cowfucker that was shilling here and elsewhere not long ago? Your names are strikingly similar.

show me. then i will show you how ridiculous that is. hint: you wont be able to.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/14/what-is-the-historical-evidence-that-jesus-christ-lived-and-died

https://www.history.com/news/was-jesus-real-historical-evidence

I could provide much more. Of course, you'll "refute" any evidence offered by sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming buzzwords and trying your hardest to ignore it, like all you halfwits do.

again, im not religious. that is for morons like yourself.

Go back to plebbit. "Enlightened" atheists such as yourself are incredibly cringe and you don't convicne anyone of your cancerous anti-theist idoelogy. There is no point in your commenting.

[–]mahavishnunj 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Are you not the hindu cowfucker that was shilling here and elsewhere not long ago? Your names are strikingly similar.

what an amazing start. idiotic enough to not even know what my username means, or remember that im a white dude in the deep south. so great, lol.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/14/what-is-the-historical-evidence-that-jesus-christ-lived-and-died

https://www.history.com/news/was-jesus-real-historical-evidence

I could provide much more. Of course, you'll "refute" any evidence offered by sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming buzzwords and trying your hardest to ignore it, like all you halfwits do.

++++++++++++++

heres from some of your own 'sources' dumb dumb. and no, you cannot provide 'much more' that wont be decimated just like this weak shit. i know reading is difficult for you, but attempt to understand this(im in bold, that may already prove too difficult for you):

"Biblical scholar Frederick Fyvie Bruce says the earliest mention of Jesus outside the New Testament occurs around 55 CE from a historian named Thallos. Thallos' history, like the vast majority of ancient literature, has been lost but not before it was quoted by Sextus Julius Africanus (ca.160-ca.240 CE), a Christian writer, in his History of the World (ca.220). This book likewise was lost, but not before one of its citations of Thallos was taken up by the Byzantine historian Georgius Syncellus in his Chronicle (ca.800). There is no means by which certainty can be established concerning this or any of the other lost references"

"Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews, written around 93–94 AD, includes two references to the biblical Jesus Christ in Books 18 and 20. The general scholarly view is that while the longer passage, known as the Testimonium Flavianum, is most likely not authentic in its entirety, it is broadly agreed upon that it originally consisted of an authentic nucleus, which was then subject to Christian interpolation.[54][55] Of the other mention in Josephus, Josephus scholar Louis H. Feldman has stated that "few have doubted the genuineness" of Josephus' reference to Jesus in Antiquities 20, 9, 1 ("the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James"). Paul references meeting and interacting with James, Jesus' brother, and since this agreement between the different sources supports Josephus' statement, the statement is only disputed by a small number of scholars."

LOL!! REALLY? ok, we'll go on with the nonsense...

"Roman historian Tacitus referred to Christus and his execution by Pontius Pilate in his Annals (written c. AD 116)"

this is the ONLY semi legitimate mention of 'jesus'. notice the date there. need i say more?

"There is only one classical writer who refers positively to Jesus and that is Mara bar Serapion, a Syriac Stoic, who wrote a letter to his son, who was also named Serapion, from a Roman prison. He speaks of Jesus as ‘the wise king’ and compares his death at the hand of the Jews to that of Socrates at the hands of the Athenians. He links the death of the ‘wise king’ to the Jews being driven from their kingdom. He also states that the ‘wise king’ lives on because of the “new laws he laid down.” The dating of the letter is disputed but was probably soon after 73 AD."

again, 2nd/3rd/4th hand information that at its EARLIEST was written nearly 100 years after this guy supposedly existed.

theres your 'proof'.

"Enlightened" atheists such as yourself are incredibly cringe and you don't convicne anyone of your cancerous anti-theist idoelogy. There is no point in your commenting.

im not even atheist dumbshit. the point of my commenting is to expose absolute morons, which ive just done here. but please bring on more, its fun.

EDIT: i can help you with some of the bigger words in there since you obviously cant even process what your own sources are saying.

[–]YJaewedwqewq 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

again, 2nd/3rd/4th hand information that at its EARLIEST was written nearly 100 years after this guy supposedly existed.

Damn, I guess plenty of major historical events didn't happen either.

Writing about something 50-70 years after it happened would imply that at the very least a similar event happened and that such an event was treated with some reverence.

It's not as if we have the entirety of the documents from that era. If in 2000 years time records were found speaking of two world-consuming conflicts only 30 years apart but found no direct sources, would they be correct to dismiss it as fictional? No, and your artificially inflated burden of proof to "own le christcucks" is equally laughable.

im not even atheist dumbshit. the point of my commenting is to expose absolute morons, which ive just done here. but please bring on more, its fun.

"Religion is for stupid people!" "The Bible and Christ are fairy tales!" lol yeah, I'm sure you're a theist, faggot.

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Damn, I guess plenty of major historical events didn't happen either.

i guess a dude lived in a whale and noah lived to 1000 yrs old and gathered 2 of every animal on earth. of course there are a few things in that dumb book that allude to real shit, thats how writing works. are you really this dense or just trolling at this point?

Writing about something 50-70 years after it happened would imply that at the very least a similar event happened and that such an event was treated with some reverence.

not what happened, as pointed out in my decimation of your own sources. ok, youre just trolling at this point.

It's not as if we have the entirety of the documents from that era.

we have the dead sea scrolls. which show how raped and bastardized the translations of even the stupid bible shit became. which you are basing your entire idiotic arguments on apparently. you cannot be this dumb....but wait, theres more!

If in 2000 years time records were found speaking of two world-consuming conflicts only 30 years apart but found no direct sources, would they be correct to dismiss it as fictional? No, and your artificially inflated burden of proof to "own le christcucks" is equally laughable.

wow. what a response. fuck i cant even come up with a funny one for this. did you read this before you typed it?

"Religion is for stupid people!" "The Bible and Christ are fairy tales!" lol yeah, I'm sure you're a theist, faggot.

ok, you got me. ive been trolled. but it was kinda fun while it lasted. if you are real, holy shit. surely not.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The nation of Israel contained many many nations including the blonde, blue-eyed Aryans, the Indian race, the Slavic race, etc.

To confuse "Israelite" with "Hebrew" is already a huge mistake.

And to call "Jesus" insofar as he existed, a Jew is plain wrong. His mom was an immigrant into Jewish land, but came from elsewhere (Syria?) and was of another ethnic background. But she lived in Jewish Galilee, and the Jews, even back then, have a religion of law, and as such, everybody was FORCED to "be Jewish" even though the Galilee was as Jewish as the moon. One of the chief magistrates of the Galilee, contemporary to Jesus, is known to have written something like "Galilee, land of heathens, you do not care about the law at all!"

Of course, Jesus' dad was in no way a Jew either. So calling Jesus a "Jew" is akin to calling those black terrorists setting fire to cars in Scandinavia, "Scandinavians". They are, but only by legality. They share nothing with the actual Scandinavians.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

There is no promsie for skin color, rememebr that. British Israelism is a cancer. The only promise is he who has faith in Christ and does as he did. Help the needy, and spread the gospel in your community and elsewhere. Spread the kingdom life, for the Kingdom is within.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Trying to be Jesus isn't what he said. YOUR interpretation of "love your fellow man as I have loved you" is to "help" and give? What about teaching a man to fish instead of giving him a morsel for today?

No, I think "Jesus" had much more elevated idea of what it means to love one another, and you're missing it by taking the Jewish propaganda along with the message of love.

Yeah I don't think "Jesus" talked about skin color. But the Israelite are described in the Old Testament, which isn't a Jewish book but a book about many many peoples.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No one comes through the father except through me.

“I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. 7If you had known Me, you would know My Father as well.

Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever believes in me will also do the works that I do; and greater works than these will he do, because I am going to the Father.

Unfortunately we are all sinners and must follow Christ and live rightfully and help our fellow brothers and community and those weak and sick.

To believe is to have faith and to do.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Follow, not IMITATE, which is mindless. Your creator gave you a mind, right? Also, "believe" is a mistranslation. "know" is much more accurate.

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Unfortunately we are all sinners and must follow Christ

im more into lovecraft. much more realistic.

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The only promise is he who has faith in Christ and does as he did.

which 'christ'? unwilling to get into that here, or did you already read my last post in this thread and duck like you always do?

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Jesus fought to protect the laws of the old kings:

And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. (Matthew 19: 16-19)

Pro-nationalist values. But whatever, you guys are free to lose yourself in your deranged supernaturalism.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah personally I think the story of "Jesus" is a reimagining of the story of Horus from very ancient Egypt, by the Jews, for their own subversive goals. The message and words remain mostly the same, probably because they knew that the story of Horus would survive for a very long time, and they wanted the credibility.

Every 12,000 years there is an Extinction Level Event, along with a "Divine Messenger" (or whatever) to help people along through the wiping of the slate.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The story seems to be influenced by that either directly or via a Roman mysteries cult.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pro-nationalist values. But whatever, you guys are free to lose yourself in your deranged supernaturalism.

There is no one who knows the father except through Christ. You're free to disregard everything else Jesus preached to push your Zionsinst tribalist nationalism (corporatism). Also, you source naturalist Freemasons, Zionists and IDF disinformation agents.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Says the guy who sources IDF shills.

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

care to reply to anything ive posted in here? probably not?

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

/u/enza

/u/d3rr

/u/csparvoneverec

/u/FlippyKing

/u/socks

/u/entropick

/u/chon

/u/DeepCrimsonPill

/u/TheJamesRocket

/u/canbot

/u/hibikiblack

/u/Jasoncarswell

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't have a spellcheck and that's attacking the messenger and does in no way negate the original information in the main post.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

...which is absolutely easy to read and understand. It truly is nitpicking and grasping at straws. Oh, and also... Splitting hairs.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There's not a lot of evidence of any historicity of Jesus, much less that someone killed him.

But the idea of the new testament was that he was the Jewish messiah, and descended from King David. As made clear in the (contradictory) genealogies in Matthew and in Luke. Although these both have Joseph as Jesus' father, which, they also claim, wasn't exactly the case.

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

if you havent seen yet-reality doesnt sit well with these(bots)people