1938 News Report: Financial War on “Anti-Semitic States” for “Persecuting Jewish FINANCIERS” not Civilian Jews
Financial War Planned Against 'Anti-Semitic' States', 500,000,000 Million Dollar Bond Raised
The Worker, the official organ of the Australian Labour Party in Queensland and regular periodical for various amalgamated Labour Unions throughout Australia, reported to the world on January 4, 1938, that “International Jewry” was orchestrating a heavily funded financial war, in addition to their previous ‘Declaration of War‘ – being the continuance of the 1933 world-wide Economic Boycott against Germany.
Financial War Planned Against 'Anti-Semitic' States
“INTERNATIONAL JEWRY – Financial War Planned Against Anti-Semitic States – £500,000,000 Fund to be Raised
[500,000,000 million is the equivalent of an est. 10 billion US dollars today.]
‘Jewry, faced with persecution in Poland, Rumania, Germany, Austria, and elsewhere, intends to hit back,’ says the ‘Sunday Chronicle,’ according to a cable dated London, January 2.
The battle will be fought on the world’s stock exchanges. Most of the anti-Semitic States are burdened with debts, and they may find their very existence threatened.
The leaders of international Jewry will meet in a village near Geneva this week to plan a fund of £500,000,000 with which to fight the persecutors of Jewish financiers in all parts of the world.
‘No difficulty is expected in raising such a fund, which, combined with a trade boycott, will enable the launching a counter-offensive, in which the Jewish persecutors may be defeated.”
Source National Library of Australia: http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/71357095
For over eight decades, the world has been led to believe that from the outset of 1933, the Germans “Persecuted” everyday German-Jews for simply being Jewish, even though German-Jews of the time, denounced this international propaganda. [Even though 150,000 Jews fought for the Reich during the 2nd World War, some holding the equivilent of General ranks.] By International Jewry’s own admission, it was the self proclaimed “Jewish FINANCIERS” who – incidentally had their parasitic usurious positions outlawed by Germany’s Economic Reform – were the ones being singled out and they did in fact feel the need to differentiate themselves from everyday Jews with this claim, as to who was supposedly being persecuted.
The targeting of “Jewish Financiers” was a well founded claim, as NSDAP policies and reform saw the cleansing of Communists in governmental positions and immoral financial and trading practices removed from the Reich – it just so happened that around 98% of these Communists and unscrupulous Speculators, were in fact Jewish. If these communist elements within Germany were Spanish or Chinese, their resulting fate would have been the same and it would have been due to their corrupt practices which greatly effected German society, not their ethnicity – as the other 2% of non-Jewish communists who also lost their positions, attests to.
However, whether being forbidden to continue economic rape against a nation and its people, could be considered “Persecution” is another question. Perhaps the reader may want to consider what life is like as the impoverished, starving and economically raped people, opposed to those minority tycoons who had their astronomical revenues through economic debt slavery reduced, in order to identify who was actually being persecuted?
Judea Declares War on Germany 1933
This same ‘International Jewry’ Declared War on Germany in 1933, with the same ‘Jewish Persecution’ propaganda as the excuse… but what had actually occurred at this point in 1933? The German-Jews denounced the international Persecution Propaganda in defense of the honour of Germany, the Nuremberg Laws weren’t enacted until late 1935, even many German-Jews who lived under two flags at that later time, saw them as reasonable and did not suffer any deprivations with a new National status and, the Krystallnacht False-Flag – which resulted in the internment of many German-Jews – did not occur until November 1938 (10 months after the aforementioned half a billion Jewish financial war plan)… so what prompted ‘International Jewry’ to Declare War on Germany in 1933?
The duly elected Adolf Hitler became Chancellor on January 30, 1933 and less than two months later, Judea Declared Economic Warfare on Germany, March 24, 1933 – coincidentally, only one day after Hitler received Plenary Power, via the passing of the Enabling Act – the Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich (“Law to Remedy the Distress of People and Reich”). The Law to Remedy Distress, resulted in communist non-effect in the Reichstag, the abolition of over 30 useless, divide and conflicting parties that had destroyed Germany for the previous 14 years. The fact that it was International Jewry who responded to the abolition of communist power within Germany, by economic warfare, also attests to who the communists were/are.
[See Denis Fahey's three books 'The Mythical Body of Christ in the Modern World', 'The Mythical Body of Christ and the Reorganization of Society' and 'The Rulers of Russia' as well as Alexander Solzhenitsyn's '200 Years Together.' All four books give a detailed analysis of communisms link to Jews. There are a list of Bolshevik war criminals living in Canada. A collection of named individuals who committed crimes against humanity under the Bolshevik regime in Russia. They later immigrated to Canada where they presently reside or have in recent history. When Russian conscripts refused to fight for the Bolsheviks, they were shot and placed in mass graves. She was tasked with examining their corpses in the graves to ensure they were dead. (See: "Ukrainians Want Jews Probed on War Crimes". Otsep, Kohn, Riwash are just a few of dozens of other Jewish Bolsheviks that are still alive who have committed untold crimes against humanity. The book 'The Jews of the Soviet Union: The History of a National Minority' - Cambridge University is referenced; there were around 20,000 Jewish Bolsheviks by 1920, an untold amount using Christian-Slavic pseudonyms, who were not included.
Hitler’s Reichstag speech on March 23, 1933 would be the beginning of his open Authoritarian rule.
A Impoverished Germany and the National Socialist Plan
International Jewry’s Declaration of Economic Warfare on Germany, was no idle threat upon a suffering people, who were reliant on their export in order for the people just to eat. The NSDAP came into possession of an impoverished nation and starving people, had virtually no army, the country was broke, enslaved by impossible WWI reparations and more than 30% of the people were suffering unemployment… all while a privileged few were living the high life at the expense of the starving and poverty stricken majority.
Germany had nothing in its hands to be a threat to anyone (except communist and financier positions) and with the monumental national problems within the country, the priorities of what deserved attention to revive the German Nation, did not revolve around putting yellow star stickers on less than one half of 1% of the population, as some inane attempt at national remedy.
However, what the NSDAP did possess, was a well prepared plan for economic reform and a 25 Point Program for the revival of the Nation, a program which was pivotal on the embodiment of the National Socialists Economic Reform. A program that would have been hindered if the communist votes were allowed to remain in the Reichstag.
The Breaking of the Slavery of Interest
The NSDAP’s Economic Reform for the Abolition of Enslavement to Interest on Money, was widely known in economist circles from 1919 and the 25 Point Program was publicly announced on February 24, 1920… It was this well considered and developed plan, which the NSDAP absolutely intended to implement, is what the self proclaimed “Jewish” Financiers anticipated and knew to be a threat to their corrupt, yet powerful positions. These international financial Tycoons and war profiteers, obviously felt a pre-emptive Counter-Offensive was in order.
A look at a few of the 25 Points will highlight who would benefit from them and who would detest these economic principles, claiming the abolition of their national theft as Persecution;
The Breaking of the Slavery of Interest: a brief overview of a few points of the 25.
6 The right to vote on the State’s government and legislation shall be enjoyed by the citizens of the State alone. We demand therefore that all official appointments, of whatever kind, whether in the Reich, in the states or in the smaller localities, shall be held by none but citizens.
11 The abolition of incomes unearned by work.
12 In view of the enormous sacrifices of life and property demanded of a nation by any war, personal enrichment from war must be regarded as a crime against the nation. We demand therefore the ruthless confiscation of all war profits.
13 We demand the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations (trusts).
14 We demand profit-sharing in large industrial enterprises.
15 We demand the extensive development of insurance for old age.
16 We demand the creation and maintenance of a healthy middle class, the immediate communalizing of big department stores, and their lease at a cheap rate to small traders, and that the utmost consideration shall be shown to all small traders in the placing of State and municiple orders.
17 We demand a land reform suitable to our national requirements, the passing of a law for the expropriation of land for communal purposes without compensation; the abolition of ground rent, and the prohibition of all speculation in land. *
18 We demand the ruthless prosecution of those whose activities are injurious to the common interest. Common criminals, usurers, profiteers, etc., must be punished with death, whatever their creed or race.
Point 6 Opposed to being considered pro-German, shockingly enough in Germany itself, it has been ridiculed as discriminatory toward Jews; but in Western Nations, is it not Constitutional that Prime Ministers and Presidents be citizens of the nations they purport to lead, in attempt to guarantee national loyalties? [Hence, all the Dual-Israeli Zionists holding public office] Further, for example, would it be considered a moral political principle for U.S. citizens to flood Chinese Parliamentary positions, to dictate how the Chinese people will be administered in their own land, by American ideological legislative enactments? Would it be ethical to allow an ethnicity of less than 0.5% of any population, to decide how another ethnicity of +99% will be administered in their own land? Is that not contradictory to the Universal Right of Self-Determination, where Peoples have the right to freely choose their sovereignty and political policies, without interference?
Gottfried Feder on Mammonism
Point 18 may seem excessively harsh to those who are absent of understanding in exactly how injurious the unscrupulous practices of usury and speculator profiteering is to the people… Usury, or rather issuing debt (via IOU) with attached interest, is not the exchange or loan of money… it is the demand of payment from one party (the Creditor) – for which they gave or forfeited absolutely nothing – from another party (the Debtor), who is required to extract affluence to service the greater interest first, before even reducing the principle, which is only based on an inequivalent, minimal fraction of a reserved asset (Fractional Reserve Lending). When this is done on a large scale, on a national scale, in the Millions and Billions, it is nothing but economic rape and enslavement of a nations people, who are ordered to exchange their time, their effort, their labour, their creativity, ingenuity, productivity and their time away from family, to give all the fruit of their efforts to economic racketeers, to self-licensed loan sharks, who gave them nothing in the first instance except an accounting entry of debt – a flick of a pen… this is precisely what Point 11 of the NSDAP’s program is referring to- “The abolition of incomes unearned by work.”
This infinite debt system, of interest on interest (demand for everything in exchange for nothing) is the ONLY CAUSE of endless inflation; and the worlds so-called Leaders, who contract these International Financiers, through promise to service their demand, do not produce anything. So where do the worlds so-called Leaders (middle-men) extract payment from to serve the International Financiers? Of course the people, the producers, who are the only source of affluence from which it can be extracted and, as the effect of interest on interest continually increases the debt demand, newly invented and increased taxes, fees, levy’s, tolls, fines, schemes and the general increase in the cost of everything, is the only way the Leaders can create increasing revenue to meet the International Financiers interest-debt demands… thus, continually reducing the value of the currency.
Is it fair or ethical to get something for nothing, through legalised theft demand? What about getting everything for nothing? Who in their right mind would think anyone who has risked nothing and given nothing, has the right to demand from another almost all the benefits of everything they’ve produced and created? What could benefit the people if all the fruits of their efforts were reinvested back into the peoples interests (by the billions), opposed to continually flowing into the pockets of the debt creators, the self-licensed loan sharks, who offered nothing?
This is a crime, a theft, so massive, so incomprehensible against all people, depriving them of the reward of their efforts and in most cases, depriving them of their most basic needs to live…
This is a crime against humanity!
So is Point 18 excessively harsh considering the scale of theft, deprivation, poverty imposition and enslavement? Is it Persecution to be denied the legal ability to continue wide-spread economic enslavement and theft, from the many to the few? Is it Persecution to out-law individuals from being able to conduct crimes against humanity under the threat of punishment? This writer thinks not! The reader can come to their own conclusion.
The Worker reports that “Anti-Semitic States” [Misnormer] [Anti-Zionist/Jewish states] [are burdened with debt], colloquially suggesting that a national, political institution (a ‘State’), holds a racial ideological bias, on behalf of all individuals under that political system, which would include Jews themselves? Whether today’s Jews of European origin are in fact Semites, is for a different discussion. In any event, the clarification of what pertains to an ‘Anti-Semitic State’ by the self-proclaimed Jewish Financiers, continues to be pursuant to economic policies and who has control over a nations policies.
Through the vote of the German people, Hitler won against the Communists in Germany, he threw out the Bankers and their fraudulent credit systems from the nation, created a new carefully controlled currency tied directly to labour (not speculative gold), developed immense public works programs for employment and installed tight controls on prices and wages – income for the German people which he increased by 10.9%. Stock markets were also controlled to keep prices from being manipulated by international market speculators; as such, Germany’s Reichsmark could not be speculated against on the international markets and Germany’s sovereign currency was not part of the Jewish financiers international usury debt system.
As a ‘State’ in the political spectrum, is generally applied to policies which implementations are mostly related to economics; and as the self described Jewish Financiers claim it was they who were being Persecuted by said State, it would appear, by their own definition, that an “Anti-Semitic State” is one which does not give the Jewish Financiers free reign over their nations people and productivity, nor legislative capacity for their economic debt slavery systems.
A nation not enslaved by usurious debt to the International Jewish Financiers, thus not under its control, is somehow Anti-Semitic?
Burdened with debt…?
US Inc. 'Calling in' Gold
Was it not all nations who were involved in WWI that were burdened with [war] debt? Was it not this war debt that spurred the manipulated Wall Street Stock Market Crash of 1929, which grew into the Great Depression of longevity through to the late 1930’s? Who benefited from this great suffering of peoples from all nations around the world, buying up everything for a penny on the pound? Who used this manipulated scenario to steal all the Americans gold, with the excuse it needed to be confiscated to the private shareholders of the Federal Reserve in order to revive from the Great Depression – facilitated by FDR’s Executive Order 6102, better-known as the Great Gold Heist of 1933? Who were the War Profiteers, Market Speculators and International Financiers that could have foreseen and benefited from such a war and resulting international economic catastrophe? The reader can perhaps speculate themselves to find that answer?
It was many of the western nations which were also still laden with WWI debt and could not pay it at the time (and thanks to interest on interest, are still paying for it today). But unlike Jewish Bolshevik Russia, following the so-called Russian Revolution (rather, Jewish usurpation of Russia) – conveniently, a mid-WWI coup d’etat – National Socialist Germany did not abandon the WWI debt and was making good on the payments. The Jewish Bolshevik USSR – for some reason(?) – wasn’t subjected to a credit recall like other nations? Special nepotistic favouritism by the creditors perhaps? However, Germany did not have gold reserves, they were stolen by the All-lies during WWI, but somehow, after total blame for WWI, accompanied by the astronomical reparation payments (“Tribute Madness” as Hitler referred), civil war, the Great Depression which the entire world was suffering and the greatest hyperinflation a nation has ever been subjected to in history, began to thrive economically and prosper above all other nations; and unemployment was near eradicated from over 30.1% in 1932 to 2.1% by the end of 1935, regardless of the WWI debt.
Was this just some economic accident, a miracle, perhaps an unexplainable ‘Economic Miracle’ as the victor economists would have us believe? Or was it simply ‘Economic Logic’ facilitated by a well considered and planned Economic Reform?
With the differing national economic formats, it might beg the question also; why couldn’t the Allies make good on their WWI payments? Who was it they were actually indebted to – therefore controlled by? Were these industrious nations not able to manage their own currencies and productivity, to find a way to feed their people? Despite the invisible debt, did they not have vast resources and the physical capacity to at least grow food, thereby creating work to produce it?
Of course, if external entities control a nations currency, control the gold reserves (or confiscated it), therefore controlling the value of currency based on the fractional gold standard (which in-turn makes it a commodity of speculation in itself), then these entities which have issued the debt (IOU imposition) dictate where any revenue or surplus – if any – will be directed… Obviously the International financiers, in the interests of humanity and good will, did not (and will not) find it in their hearts to forego this debt created from a flick of a pen, to direct future revenue back to the people. The debtors, being beholden to the currency creators, the creditors, the self-licensed loan sharks, then offer the nations public assets to service the unpaid debt (credit recall), thus making the International Financiers the owners of those countries National productivity, manufacturing, infrastructure and utilities etc. (commonly disguised as Privatisation) who in-turn, ultimately charge the people for the use of their own public services they built… Unfortunately, post-privatisation, the people no longer receive the affluence generated from their own collective productivity, as the former public services become private businesses for profit. Further, the International Financiers still demand the interest on interest be paid! But where would that revenue come from once the people lose the benefits of their privatised public services and works? Inflation and an endless creation of new and increased taxes. This is total theft and wealth extraction out of all nations who submit to the demands of the International Financiers, who are nothing but large scale Counterfeiters = Criminals.
I refer to Point 18 of the NSDAP Program.
So who would these external elements of fiat currency (debt) issuance be? Could it be the same self-described Jewish Financiers? Why would these Jewish Financiers, if not International Financiers, be interested in foreign states who have taken steps to implement their own sovereign economic systems, having to describe them as “Anti-Semitic States”?
In reflection of the economically crippled world of the day, the majority of nations had the suffering yolk of international war debt and results of commodity speculation around their necks, thus controlled and owned… but the few nations that broke free from this economic enslavement system, giving back to their own people, whilst still paying the debt, were the ones the world was told, were an evil threat to humanity, had war declared upon them and were labelled Anti-Semitic.
“Anti-Semitic States burdened with debt”? No, States not under Jewish Financier control.
Hitler: "Foolish to try to make golf backed money when we had no gold.
“In the exchange of telegrams from the 1939 -1940 period,
the British were ready to negotiate peace, if
Germany returned to the Gold Standard.”
∼ Captain J. Creagh-Scott, 1947
Jewry faced with persecution in Poland, Rumania, Austria…?
The Persecution narrative which had been peddled throughout the world in regard to European Jews, was not only a repetitive escalation of propaganda since the 1933 Jewish Declaration of War against Germany, but common propaganda prior to the Third Reich and beyond; even claiming Jewish Persecution under the Jewish coup government that usurped Empirical Russia (aka Russian Revolution), persecuted by their co-religionists, even though under U.S.S.R. law Anti-Semitism was punishable by death?
So is there any logical claim that Jewry was subject to persecution by Rumania as an Anti-Semitic State? Rumania was not allied with Germany or any other state at this time, it sought to maintain neutrality and cordial international relations. Poland had its own inner ethnic turmoil, social and employment problems, but was not allied with Germany either. However, with the cordial and progressive efforts Hitler had made toward diplomatic relations, the late First Marshall of Poland, Jozef Pilzudski and Adolf Hitler did sign a German-Polish non Aggression Pact in 1934, agreeing to forego military conflict for a period of 10 years and Germany recognising Polands borders… Unfortunately, Marshall Pilzudski died in 1935. Poland had historically been used by Allied states to incite war and border conflict – a cordial relationship with Germany would not have been pleasing to the International Financiers and war mongers, therefore, must have been an Anti-Semitic State.
Hitler speaks on German-Polish Peace, here.
Despite Rumania’s 1921 Little Entente alliance in defense of potential Hungarian territorial ambitions, an agreement to supposedly safeguard against any restoration by the Habsburgs in response the Versailles Treaty and, the previous 1926 military pact with France, via the 1921 Act, King Carol II was caught in a sphere of power struggles and desired to stay neutral as much as possible. However, it too had communist political party conflict, internal ethnic turmoil from sizable ethnic minorities, border disputes, along with its much sought after natural resources, especially oil. Germany’s contract with Royal Dutch Shell, via its pro-Nationalist CEO, Henri Deterding, who had contracts with Rumanian oil too, saw the commodity speculators not impressed with the growing German-Rumanian diplomatic relations that were unfolding, especially after the Little Entente’s complete disbandment in 1938 – therefore, must have been an Anti-Semitic State. King Carol’s Rumania became ripe for social turmoil and movements, to keep Romania with state weakening internal strife, so as to not side with, or trade with Germany.
Austria? Since the end of WWI, the Austrian people who had arbitrarily been subject to the dissection of the German/Austro-Hungarian Empire, via the Versailles dictat and the Treaty of Saint Germain, had desired to re-join the German Reich and even more eagerly, since Germany began to prosper under National Socialism, while they themselves suffered in debt and poverty. But in defiance of the peoples right to self-determination, the merger was forbidden by the WWI All-lies! Austrian Leader Engelbert Dollfuss also vehemently opposed it, especially after Hitler became Chancellor in 1933. Austria too was in political, social and economic turmoil, with revolutionary movements and even civil war in 1934. Dollfuss eventually dissolved parliament and made himself dictator, outlawing movements against him. He was a conservative, anti-Communist and attempted to model himself and his government on Mussolini’s Fascism. He was assassinated during a 1934 attempted coup d’etat, the July Putsch and his successor, Kurt Schuschnigg, followed closely in his format. The growing national feeling to unite once again with Germany, would have been an anxious anticipation for the Jewish Financiers. So to excite international condemnation of Austria, by defamatory accusations of an Anti-Semitic State, served as a strategic psychological precursor for international support for war, whether it be military or economic warfare. Unlike in Italy and Germany, the Rothschilds were still conducting their usurious financial business in Austria, but only 3 months after the above financial war plan was announced, 99.71% of the people turned out and 99.73% of the those Austrian people voted to rejoin the Reich in an April 10, 1938 Referendum. On the same day, another Referendum was held in Germany to ask the volk if they wished to rejoin Austria too. Of the 99.5% of the people who turned out, 99.8% of the German people agreed to unite again with their Austrian brothers and sisters… The Rothschild bank in Vienna was closed that same week, with all of its assets seized by the Reich government… the act of an apparent Anti-Semitic State against corrupt Financiers.