you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yes it does... did you even read the page?

Whoever—with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, uses the mail, any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other facility of interstate or foreign commerce to engage in a course of conduct that—places that person in reasonable fear of the death of or serious bodily injury to a person, a pet, a service animal, an emotional support animal, or a horse described in clause (i), (ii), (iii), or (iv) of paragraph (1)(A); or causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to [that person; an immediate family member (as defined in section 115) of that person a spouse or intimate partner of that person]

What they're doing is literally harassing people they disagree with to get them fired — which would definitely cause "substantial emotional distress" — and releasing someone's name, address, etc. and telling everyone they're a Nazi (who you often tell people to punch or kill) would make someone "reasonably fear" "death" or "serious bodily injury".

This law is literally cited by lawyers when talking about doxing. Someone was arrested for doxing GOP Senators, and some Muslim guy from New York was sent to prison for, among other things: doxing.

You're obviously a troll, so further replies will cease.

[–]thefirststone 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

None of that is inherent to doxing. Stop dragging down the discussion.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're looking at the pyramid upside-down; citing sources is at the top, not bottom. You, meanwhile, refuse to refute a single one of my points, instead defending the far-left by repeating the same point over and over again, after I've repeatedly debunked it.

Blocked for being a leftist troll.

[–]thefirststone 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

None of your points address, much less debunk, my observation. Nice glowing, though, shill.