you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Even if there are still serious unanswered questions about 9/11, those presidents' comments are not "warnings". They're merely stating what the Pentagon chiefs tell them to say.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

And the DoD filled with Foreign Agents was responsible for 9/11 with the help of Israel. Rumsfeld wanted nothing more but to amalgamate offcies at the Pentagon, he got his wish after 9/11.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Very interesting. Rumsfeld's activities should have been studied much more closely at the time.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Dov Zakheim as well.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good point

He's almost a Kissinger 2.0

It really annoyed me that Reagan's 2nd Term was - as it was seen then and thereafter - the starting point of a long period of appointees, lobbyists, and others with obvious conflicts of interests that compromised them with regard to the US's best interests at home and abroad. Corporate and internationally-controlled people were, in 1984-88, controlling the very problems that they were supposed to regulate and limit, resulting in massive strides in middle-east instability, Big Pharma, Big Banks (recall the recession thereafter), Wall Street, Big News Media, Big Corp &c. It seemed relatively new to see these foxes running the hen houses, which continues today.