you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

There's no need for the attacks. And none of this is true. If you have an argument for me, write to me directly, rather than type this cowardice nonsense to someone else. Man up.

[–]Froglich 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

There's no need for the attacks. And none of this is true.

Anyone who glances at your comment history will easily conclude you're a shill.

Allow me to demonstrate :

Sucks most recent comment.

https://saidit.net/s/Coronavirus/comments/829i/shocker_lisbon_court_rules_that_only_09_of/tze2

What this disinformation website is not offering is any information about the lawsuit for which the document was written. If you download and read the document (in Portuguese), you'll see that the 152 deaths were discovered in a very limited study of autopsy reports. These autopsies are not the primary means by which COVID19 deaths are calculated. Moreover, 99% of autopsies do not determine the cause of death as a virus or COVID19 or other endemics or pandemics. What they determine is water in the lungs and other physical developments that caused the death.

So, you're (correctly) indicating that people die of pneumonia, and indirectly admitting nobody dies from Covid?

The WHO admits the Covid tests are bogus, so the Covid tests are meaningless.

So, all of the pneumonia deaths are Covid, except for the blunt trauma Covid deaths, cancer-Covid, etc.

Even the CDC admits only 6% of their alleged Covid deaths were legit; which is still exaggerated.
This admission is truly shocking, as the CDC literally admits that they are manufacturing and spreading disinformation.
Don't take my word for it. Search for, "6% CDC".

Also, ignore the first search result. Guaranteed to be a "fact checker" Gates-paid advert.

So, in summary it's evident to me that you're here to "debunk" the facts, and push the narrative of the CDC which admits to lying about the basic facts of 94% of all reported deaths.

There's no need for the attacks. And none of this is true.

The attacks are justified. You're a shill for the NWO.

I hope you make it to 2030 and beyond, so you can live to see the enslavement of those you love.

I'm sure the slaver blood-money they threw at you will be long gone by then.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Anyone who glances at your comment history will easily conclude you're a shill.

Only if they're incredibly stupid (Those aren't shill posts)

The attacks are justified. You're a shill for the NWO.

No - they were not. Have a look at the pyramid of debate and Saidit's rules.

It's apparent that you disagree with the 99% of the world who agree with facts and science. Those people aren't shills.

[–]Froglich 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

I couldn't help but notice you've avoided contesting any of the hard facts that pointed out.

CDC admitted that only 6% of documented Covid deaths were remotely legit.

  • Sucks, it would appear the foundation of your position is made of sand.
    Feel free to provide feedback.
    Perhaps you feel the CDC may be lying?

No doubt the remaining 6% was actually seasonal influenza, and as you pointed out nobody actually dies from the flu (aka Covid).
They die from pneumonia.

Moving on, the definition of "pandemic" was redefined, and the mass fatality rate requirements were eliminated.

So, every flu season on record was a similarly deadly event. So much so, that 2020 was only the 12th most deadly year since 2000 (12th place/20, 40%).
The 2020 pandemic was in the lower 50 percentile.
A below average death rate year. *Safer than most (60%).

Does this make sense, sucks?
I suspect you find reality confusing. Try to think. Think sucks, think.

Either way, I'm sure you'll quickly get paid to forget this info.

It's apparent that you disagree with the 99% of the world who agree with facts and science.

99%, huh? Do you have a source for that?

Those people aren't shills.

Agreed.
They're victims of disinformation from disingenuous vipers like yourself...

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The particularly weird thing about this C-19 flu is the dry lung thing that suddenly goes bad, unlike normal wet pneumonia.

Moving on, the definition of "pandemic" was redefined, and the mass fatality rate requirements were eliminated.

So, every flu season on record was a similarly deadly event. So much so, that 2020 was only the 12th most deadly year since 2000 (12th place/20, 40%).

The 2020 pandemic was in the lower 50 percentile.

A below average death rate year. *Safer than most (60%).

Got sources handy for those? I'd like to share with my local groups on FB.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Why would anyone respond to attacks? Are you insane?

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Socks, he didn't attack you in the post above. I think the best thing to do would be to counter his arguments.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Saidit's double standards:

Abuse and attack anyone here who isn't in agreement with the alt right, and expect them to respond to comments that contain those attacks. Mods support this (as I've found; if however I respond with a negative comment, mods contact me with their concerns; mod abuse will now include these double standards, and those who left Reddit because of mod abuse there, will also consider leaving Saidit, because of mod abuse here, /u/d3rr). Just as the rape victim shouldn't have to respect the rapist, I won't respect the attackers here.

It is interesting to me that you do not like the abuses of Israel and the US Israel lobby, but you seem to value comments by abusers here. I hope you will think about this, Jesus.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

You are still active at Reddit. You aren't here because you were banned from Reddit.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

As usual, you assume too much. Leave me alone.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

So I can't go to reddit and find your much loved comments and posts from over there?

As I've said before, I will do as I like.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Socks, his first comment had ad hominems directed at you. I don't deny that. I don't even think he denies that but his 2nd comment, he was not attacking you in the least and he was trying to make an argument that you could have countered. Instead, you rant about the alt-right on a sub that isn't even alt-right. I also told Frog not to post ad hominems. His 2nd comment did not have any fallacies that I am aware of.

Just as the rape victim shouldn't have to respect the rapist, I won't respect the attackers here.

Attacking isn't a fallacy as long as it isn't a personal attack. I have seen your fair share of personal attacks and I do not deny there are many directed at you but it would be best to simply debunk frog's 2nd post (which has no attacks directed at you) and stop whining. You've asked if he was insane for a post that simply asks for sources and counters your argument.

It is interesting to me that you do not like the abuses of Israel and the US Israel lobby, but you seem to value comments by abusers here. I hope you will think about this, Jesus.

Low blow. This has nothing to do with me. I'm not valuing comments or picking sides. I understand that frogs first comment was fileld with emotion but his 2nd was well argued. Debunk his claims or ignore him, that simple.