you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Froglich 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

I couldn't help but notice you've avoided contesting any of the hard facts that pointed out.

CDC admitted that only 6% of documented Covid deaths were remotely legit.

  • Sucks, it would appear the foundation of your position is made of sand.
    Feel free to provide feedback.
    Perhaps you feel the CDC may be lying?

No doubt the remaining 6% was actually seasonal influenza, and as you pointed out nobody actually dies from the flu (aka Covid).
They die from pneumonia.

Moving on, the definition of "pandemic" was redefined, and the mass fatality rate requirements were eliminated.

So, every flu season on record was a similarly deadly event. So much so, that 2020 was only the 12th most deadly year since 2000 (12th place/20, 40%).
The 2020 pandemic was in the lower 50 percentile.
A below average death rate year. *Safer than most (60%).

Does this make sense, sucks?
I suspect you find reality confusing. Try to think. Think sucks, think.

Either way, I'm sure you'll quickly get paid to forget this info.

It's apparent that you disagree with the 99% of the world who agree with facts and science.

99%, huh? Do you have a source for that?

Those people aren't shills.

Agreed.
They're victims of disinformation from disingenuous vipers like yourself...

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The particularly weird thing about this C-19 flu is the dry lung thing that suddenly goes bad, unlike normal wet pneumonia.

Moving on, the definition of "pandemic" was redefined, and the mass fatality rate requirements were eliminated.

So, every flu season on record was a similarly deadly event. So much so, that 2020 was only the 12th most deadly year since 2000 (12th place/20, 40%).

The 2020 pandemic was in the lower 50 percentile.

A below average death rate year. *Safer than most (60%).

Got sources handy for those? I'd like to share with my local groups on FB.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Why would anyone respond to attacks? Are you insane?

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Socks, he didn't attack you in the post above. I think the best thing to do would be to counter his arguments.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Saidit's double standards:

Abuse and attack anyone here who isn't in agreement with the alt right, and expect them to respond to comments that contain those attacks. Mods support this (as I've found; if however I respond with a negative comment, mods contact me with their concerns; mod abuse will now include these double standards, and those who left Reddit because of mod abuse there, will also consider leaving Saidit, because of mod abuse here, /u/d3rr). Just as the rape victim shouldn't have to respect the rapist, I won't respect the attackers here.

It is interesting to me that you do not like the abuses of Israel and the US Israel lobby, but you seem to value comments by abusers here. I hope you will think about this, Jesus.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

You are still active at Reddit. You aren't here because you were banned from Reddit.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

As usual, you assume too much. Leave me alone.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

So I can't go to reddit and find your much loved comments and posts from over there?

As I've said before, I will do as I like.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Why should I care....

Give it a break

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

That's quite the accusation, socks. Seriously.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Fine - 'stalker' deleted

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Socks, his first comment had ad hominems directed at you. I don't deny that. I don't even think he denies that but his 2nd comment, he was not attacking you in the least and he was trying to make an argument that you could have countered. Instead, you rant about the alt-right on a sub that isn't even alt-right. I also told Frog not to post ad hominems. His 2nd comment did not have any fallacies that I am aware of.

Just as the rape victim shouldn't have to respect the rapist, I won't respect the attackers here.

Attacking isn't a fallacy as long as it isn't a personal attack. I have seen your fair share of personal attacks and I do not deny there are many directed at you but it would be best to simply debunk frog's 2nd post (which has no attacks directed at you) and stop whining. You've asked if he was insane for a post that simply asks for sources and counters your argument.

It is interesting to me that you do not like the abuses of Israel and the US Israel lobby, but you seem to value comments by abusers here. I hope you will think about this, Jesus.

Low blow. This has nothing to do with me. I'm not valuing comments or picking sides. I understand that frogs first comment was fileld with emotion but his 2nd was well argued. Debunk his claims or ignore him, that simple.