you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

So /u/hibikiBlack says he debunked the 'Greater Israel project' censors and blocks me from his Jesuit sub for a simple disagreement that magnora7 has yet to respond to, and claims I'm a CIA agent, yet he has not one time mentioned the Jew Yinon, or PNAC and the 25 Jewish neoconservatives that likely orchestrated 9/11 and the Anthrax attacks. No, rather you blame Catholics when Catholics are not even part of the Church anymore because Talmudics and Marranos took over. Gerogetown is OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, literally you or I could attend and get scholarships there and study policial science or Agritculutre, etc. Jesuit-trained is a hilarious epithet for "don't blame the Zionist Jews."

P2 masons and Marrano Jesuits are NOT CATHOLIC. For crying out loud, the Catholics weote a two volume set called Neo-con and Neo-coned Again about the pro-Israel Zionist Jews that shilled for war for their Ashkenaz pipeline.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I think Hibikiblack is moving from pure realist alt-right to slowly revealing his true colors.

I unfriended him a few weeks back for some other insanity and now this BS. No, certainly something isn't right here. Somebody changing their discourse like that is just not possible organically.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Hibiki always talked about the Jesuits like this. I still have him friended (like some of you, I friended him because of his good content and comments), but found it weird how he had a “hard on” for Catholics and never blamed Zionism for anything - he would even sometimes make a post saying the Jesuits/Catholics were responsible for something I for sure knew was Zionist orchestrated, but I figure everyone has their opinion and side to things. I’ve never seen anyone call him out for it until now though.

I mean, it’s not like the rabbit-hole is one straight path - we all know the same stuff, but got to this spot by taking different paths of research. Maybe if you went down hibiki’s rabbithole (which could have been the Jesuits), you’d see things from his angle too.

Not defending his stance, just defending his right to have one. I honestly haven’t noticed any inconsistency. One could always check his post/submission history.

Then again wtf do I know, everything I think is right-side up is upside-down nowadays.

Edit: and I just read the convo between him & Jesus & honestly I agree with Jesus, but this isn’t new dialogue from hibiki at all.

[–]LarrySwinger2 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree. He posts good content and I didn't observe any kind of 180 degrees from him. And it's good to give people the benefit of the doubt. TPTSNB want use mistrusting of each other and divided. If someone says something that sounds implausible, take it with a grain of salt, I'd say, but don't call each other shill over nothing.

That being said, I also find Jesus more convincing here, especially the article he posted about the Jesuit control narrative being perpetuated as a deflection mechanism makes sense to me. It reminds me of a debate I listened to about this subject1, where the Jesuit accuser also wasn't convincing. So I'm keeping this in the back of my mind. Also note the ad hominems Hibiki employs in this thread. That's kind of a tell. But so long as we take nobody's word for granted, shills can't do much harm. Therefore I'm indifferent to him being a shill or not.

  1. For the sake of completeness: this is the entire audio I listened to, of which the debate is a part. The debate is the most interesting part, though.