Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test explaining how useless the results are for viral examination.

submitted by HibikiBlackCaudillo from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

What a horrible explanation. No one who believes in the PCR test will walk away from that video with a different opinion.

What proves that the test is useless is the astronomical probability of a false positive. What makes it misused is the fact that they test people over and over and over until they get a positive result.

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

At 35 cycles it gives 95% chance of a false positive. So the virus may not even exist anymore, it also has never been isolated.

There are more factors in which PCR can go wrong:
They do not do the essential negative test, to see if they caught something like the cold or the flu instead. This depends on the exact RNA bits they are looking for in which lab. They may just find a cat-virus or similar.

Additionally small contaminations can influence the outcome, and process errors during the cycles.