you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Mnemonic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You can skip the letter if it's too much, but can you answer the question why Jung's reply letter was related to him being set aside with mishandled labels as someone who should have been tried in court?

[–]RoxannaHardbutt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If you had received a "sound Swiss thrashing" from someone particularly a doctor or a "health care professional" you had approached on trust, surely you would want him or her hauled before the courts, how many ppl did Jung "thrash," how often did he administer thrashings and what else did he do .. because he sounds like a violent psychopath to me.

[–]Mnemonic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not a real thrashing, it's a verbal thrashing. Freud's letter gives the much needed context. For example, this person was not a patient.