you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RoxannaHardbutt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The wall of text is not gonna get you anywhere .. hit the edit button and put in a few paragraph breaks just so ppl can read it.

Psychoanalysis identifies the problem be it conceit which it very often is, whereas Fool on the Hill types who hate everybody and want to rub their noses in filth, were treated by acknowledging the patients illness is incurable then sending him or her off to the pensions office.

Where in anticipation of a guaranteed income sans labor he or she undergoes a remarkable recovery, that's if they are recoverable, mental illness of any kind does not grant license to kill .. under Common Law if you did it you hang without mitigation or MI pleas.

[–]Mnemonic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You can skip the letter if it's too much, but can you answer the question why Jung's reply letter was related to him being set aside with mishandled labels as someone who should have been tried in court?

[–]RoxannaHardbutt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If you had received a "sound Swiss thrashing" from someone particularly a doctor or a "health care professional" you had approached on trust, surely you would want him or her hauled before the courts, how many ppl did Jung "thrash," how often did he administer thrashings and what else did he do .. because he sounds like a violent psychopath to me.

[–]Mnemonic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not a real thrashing, it's a verbal thrashing. Freud's letter gives the much needed context. For example, this person was not a patient.

[–]Mnemonic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh and upon the edit: Again psychoanalysis is Freud and There are mutiple reasons Jung went his own way. Jung is analytical psychology.