Many many people are so proud to be getting their "1st dose" of some unnecessary experimental mystery shot

submitted by EndlessSunflowers from (self.conspiracy)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]VirgilGriff 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (7 children)

15% of people who contract COVID-19 get a serious case and require hospitalization, and likely have long-term damage to their lungs and other organs. A significant percentage of those die, especially if you're 65+.

Why do you think the effects of the vaccine are anything approaching that level of danger?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

Why do you think the effects of the vaccine are anything approaching that level of danger?

Do the waxxes prevent the spread of the virus? Can you provide a source?

Edit: inserting an open secret

WHO (Accidentally) Confirms Covid is No More Dangerous Than Flu Head of Health Emergencies Program “best estimates” put IFR at 0.14%

[–]LesbianOutlaw 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

You anti-vaxxer nutjobs are straight-up delusional. Provide YOUR sources that the vaccines have no effectiveness. All the sources I’ve seen for the Pfizer vaccine show a >90% effectiveness in preventing infection and 100% effectiveness in preventing illness serious enough to require a hospital stay.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 13 insightful - 8 fun13 insightful - 7 fun14 insightful - 8 fun -  (4 children)

You anti-vaxxer nutjobs are straight-up delusional.

Starting out with a personal attack, huh?

Are you trying to deliberately undermine your own credibility???

All the sources I’ve seen for the Pfizer vaccine show a >90% effectiveness in preventing infection and 100% effectiveness in preventing illness serious enough to require a hospital stay.

Then it should be easy for you to provide multiple sources that support your claim.

  • 90% in whyral infection
  • 100% hospital visits

I won't hold my breath

Good luck with that.

Edit: https://saidit.net/s/VaccineSkepticism/comments/7om2/states_report_growing_number_of_covidcases_among/

[–]LesbianOutlaw 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Why should we have to spoonfeed you nutjobs? Is this your first day on the Internet? A quick search for “Pfizer vaccine effectiveness” yields literally thousands of articles and scientific journals.

https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-vaccines-int/pfizer-moderna-covid-19-vaccines-highly-effective-after-first-shot-in-real-world-use-u-s-study-shows-idUSKBN2BL2UW
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2036242
https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-confirm-high-efficacy-and-no-serious

But “oh no it’s all a fake conspiracy by teh j00s and this one tinfoil hat Bitchuter I watch is the only one telling the truth, promise!”

[–]Tom_Bombadil 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

"Effective" by their measurements is a reduction in symptoms.
They claim the symptoms are reduced to some degree.

They don't have a symptom efficacy yardstick, or symptom efficacy calibration device.

It's completely nebulous.

Someone could die, and they would still claim the patient has "reduced symptoms", and it was effective.

They haven't studied transmission of illness. To date.

Wasn't part of the study.

No reduced flu/cold transmission.

[–]Node 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Wait, is this actually a troll trying to make the vaxxers look retarded?

[–]turtlew0rk 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Why are you here?