Training in order to remain objective in a narcissistic society.

submitted by HibikiBlackCaudillo from self.conspiracy

There's a lot of competition out there in order to stand out as much as possible. While competition itself can be healthy, sometimes its not always wise to try to stand out and become a slave to popular opinion.

If we are to improve our status in order to change society, we have to look at things from an objective point of view and take the most logical course of action, even if we don't make others happy about what we do.

all 3 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]StillLessons 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The wise person is always fundamentally alone. Realizing that nobody ever agrees completely with any other individual, he/she knows there is no need to refer or defer to others in recognizing truth. Seeing truth, he/she merges with that truth and acts in harmony with it. Those ruled by the crowd (either in front of it or as part of it) can never know truth, for they are always slaves to that crowd, and truth is impossible for crowds to understand.

[–]charlie6067 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

“If you can’t control your own emotions, you’re forced to control other people’s behaviour,” “That’s why the touchiest, most oversensitive and easily upset must not set the standard for the rest of us.” John Cleese

[–]the-ham-bummer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you sure you aren't referring to the normies vs. robots issue?

Robots, on the autistic spectrum, do not tolerate deviation from what they see as truth and order.

Normies, on the narcissist spectrum, consider order and truth like one among other aspects they can build upon. They do not tolerate truth and order used against them, because they see it as a personal attack.

The robot is the more rational and has to rationalize the existence of the normie network protocols which are emotion based, selfish, and utterly well suited to practical survival. Unlike the robot's inflexibility which, when sparking determination, is well suited to analytical work in science art manufacturing programming politics.

Try not to be the guys in the middle, who don't develop either emotional intelligence and sensitivity, nor determination and stubborness.

"But because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold, not hot, I will begin to vomit thee out of my mouth".

Final warning to robots made in the UK and USA. You have the traditional tendency of overrationalizing. I see it in car enthusiasts, SF enthusiasts, music enthusiasts, and most of all atheists. You are very cringey. When you use logic, you must put in the same care a programmer puts into coding. Else you are not being logical, you are forming a choir. The golden rules: do not assert anything in the supernatural and check that your implications are airtight.

Example one: "turtles all the way down", typical mockery by the rational, is a perfectly achievable topology in euclidean 3D space plus gravity. Just put two turtles with their feet against each other, put others around them in a sphere, gravity will take care of the rest. So, I formally demonstrated that the thousands of rationalists who mocked that phrase are IDIOTS.

Example two: "If everything needs a creator (GOD) then who is the creator of god bwahahaha!". Define to create: being the cause of. A cause and B effect when every instance of A results in B, but "result" implies an unidirectional monodimensional time axis. Your baby doesn't cause you to have broken the condom, the condom breakage causes you to obtain a baby. So, to formulate the concept of creator in the domain of God you need time. You cannot use the creation time anymore I can use a videogame time to do homework within. And this doesn't even take account the other dimension, space. So, those atheist "proofs" have more holes than swiss cheese and you swallow them and put them in your pathetic t shirts.

Beware, I don't want you to believe, not my problem. Wanna be atheist? "I don't believe": you win! Was it soo difficult? Noo, you have to justify by raping logic! The lowest IQ cargo cultist is more logical than you! Cringey.