If we separate the mind into the conscious, sub-conscious and non-conscious, than the non-conscious would be the part that isn't being processed right now.

ok, that's a definition that you made up, and most of us go with conscious and non-conscious. The idea that the brain has to have some level of conscious awareness of its functions for them to occur is faulty. Your cerebellum is highly active, full of timing circuits, and that is not considered 'sub-conscious'. Your heart rate, sweating and breathing etc is managed by your medulla, and again is not considered 'sub conscious'. Both are non-conscious systems that continue to function even when your consciousness is entirely absent,

In this system, awareness would follow sub-conscious action, not non-conscious.

Again, terminalogical nightmare, dude. When you catch a ball, the signals go from your eye, via your occipital cortex, to your cerebellum. no conscious invovlement whatsoever. the movement of your arm to catch the ball is entirely non-conscious, not sub conscious.

You need to get up to speed with the current linguistic norms in neuroscience if you want to have a conversation that has any meaning beyond your own ego.

Well, yes, but if we retrain the subconscious to only provide one type of input, our conscious activity becomes very predictable.

That's 'moving the goal posts' to nowhereville.

transtemporal states are like the time crystals of conscious awareness. Ritual, mediation etc produce standing waves of neural activity, where your conscious awareness breaks free of the tight timing circuits of the dorsal raphe loop and tunes into resonant patterns in sensory input and internal creations.