you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

1 /u/magnora7

First of all, are you /u/poopdawg15 Southern Israelite (Drake Shelton)? I know /u/useless_aether and /u/HibikiBlack often linked his rants and I nevertheless debunked them. The guy is a Freemason who pushes all the ridiculous theories of Phelps. I didn’t even have to prove he was a Freemason to know that he was.

Proof he is a member of a Masonic lodge:

Also, like Phelps, this Zionist Freemason is a flat earther.

This liar promotes all the Zionist disinfo, such as that that Jesuits control the US, that nuclear bombs do not exist, that JFK faked his death and they killed a look-a-like instead. This is obvious disinformation. The truth? Judeo-Freemasonry killed JFK and this is proven in Michele Metta’s book.

Ludendorff blamed Freemasons for bringing America into the World War I, helped by the Jesuits, B'nai B'rith and the Grand Lodge of New York! This, he stated, was done to destroy Austria Hungary, a Catholic world power. Had it not been for Freemasonry, Germany would have won the war

Sure, stage play in finance and profit for international arms dealers, this has been a custom of most conflicts throughout history.

You can tell OP is a disinfo guy, because he knows to avoid Bronder, C.H. Douglas, Erich Ludendorff, Douglas Reed and Hennecke Kardel as sources.

You can tell Poopdawg is spewing fallacies when his first sentence is a fallacy. And he debunks absolutely nothing and sources absolutely nothing.

But we can all agree on this: If it was Hitler's plan to stop the Jews, he did a terrible job.

Strawman and a very stupid one at that. This implies that because someone did not win or reach what they strove to achieve, whatever that may have been, then they must have been a controlled asset for the winner's side. This is a reductio ad absurdum if I've ever seen one. You are open to read Hitler's aunt's letter to the German people on where she stood and what she believed Hitler wished to achieve.

Bronder's book is full of disinformation, he literally writes that B'nai B'rith was left open throughout the war. This is a lie, many leaders were arrested and executed and thrown in concentration camps, there are hundreds of documents and newspaper clippings illustrating this, before and after Schacht was fired by Hitler in which case the whole of International Finance was against him.

The National Socialists, as Feder contended, dropped the international gold standard as a medium of exchange and used MEFO/treasury notes which significantly decreased speculation, a practice which Feder and Hitler openly preached against, as they believed UNEARNED INCOME, meaning income through speculation and usury, such as that on Wall-street, stole the wealth of the community. This everyone can agree with.

If you take Ludendorff's comments as true, which I do, that the Systems of Force in the world were: [1] The inner Jewish circle and their servants in the Grand Orient of France; [2] The Vatican and the General of the Jesuits and [3] Atheistic Bolshevism.

Yes, lets take opinions as the sole truth when actions paint a very different picture. Secondly, sure, the wealthy Zionists like Weizman and to a lesser extent the Ziofascist Jabotinsky, wanted a Jewish state. Certain Zionist Jews, many tied to Masonic organizations such as B'nai B'rith (crypto-Jews from New England funded and lead some of the first Masonic lodges) and Mormonism of which Joseph Smith has Jewish ancestry and was a former Mason, wanted a state for Jews since the 1840's and many Jews were already emigrating to Palestine in mass prior to Hitler being born. Your also open to read Mein Kampf, which was not written by a Jesuit priest as many disinformationists claim; they get this lie from Edmond Paris’s book, of which this claim is not even sourced and whose book first appeared in one of the largest Masonic buildings in the world, which housed the Grand Orient of France. So we have a book claiming that Jesuits wrote Mein Kampf, they didn’t, which first was published in the Grand Orient of Paris and which is often re-published by Jack Chick publications who is an staunch Zionist. So, it is clear that Masonry was openly against National Socialism and National Socialism openly against Masonry and marrano Jesuitism (Memorialists).

[–]poopdawg15 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I have tried to verify the part about Bronder and B'nai Brith. My ctrl + f search of the document returns only a single reference to B'nai Brith during a section about the 1920s. Here's that.

Forgive me if I'm suspicious this is a bot, because of the syntax and the Herculean, impossible and impassioned output--like 100 man hours effort.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry, I thought it was referenced in Bronder's book, rather, it was a reference in the LaRouche camp, in a book by Anton Chaitkin, which I read a few years ago. If I could read German well, I'd read Bonder but I only know a little German and the English version is absolutely illegible. Though I have tried to skim through it.

The B’nai B’rith was the one Jewish organization that Hitler deliberately (left open ) and functioning under Nazi rule from 1933 on. In 1939, Britain made a dramatic change in its policy toward Hitler-after teaching Hitler his race theories, after forcefully backing his takeover of Germany, after financing and equipping his armies, Britain now changed publicly to opposing Hitler. Only at that point, in 1939, about a year after Hitler finally closed B’nai B’rith’s Nazi-authorized German operations.

The Gestapo was already sequestering and closing down and arrestig B'nai B'rith lodges and leader in mid 1934. That B'nai B'rith taught Hitler his race theories is ridiculous and they never armed his takeover of Germany.

[–]HibikiBlack 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Well, It's not so much that you debunk the claims but rather, more like you religiously hold to your own biases. I mean seriously, under normal circunstances I've been able to completely destroy most of your arguments and you keep coming back with the Jewish satanic bible walls of text...

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm no Hitlerite, I just despise lies when truth will do. I also agree somewhat with the contention that the Church was largely subverted by various factions, including neo-platonic Jesuitism and that modern day Jews are the very opposite of biblical Jews or Nazarite Jews who followed Christ. God in the Old Testament continuously rebuked the Jews as did Moses, despite God picking Jews as the seed to which they were to follow God and then Messiah in truth.

They refused and were stubborn and so another nation was picked to spread the gospel.

Sure, I'm biased, everyone is, but you, yourself are just as biased. You did write, for instance, that JFK was a secret protestant whose goal was to subvert the Catholic church; when in fact he was a Catholic and was murdered by P2 lodge Freemasons who infiltrated the Church; Grand Orient Freemasons, Scottish Rite Freemasons (evidenced in the anti-JFK pact) and Ziofascists such as the Irgun and Israeli intelligence and their 5th column in the US aligned with the pro-interventionist CIA, which were at odds with Smith, JFK and Fulbright, the latter who openly exposed Jewish Zionist control in congress.

And, similarly, users claim here that Israel isn't Jewish. Howevet, it is directly referenced in their Limited Liability company as a Jewish majority state. Hence, Zionist Jews and non-Jews, including Jesuit Zionists and Orthodox Jewish Zionists of all types in the US are breaking the law when they hold public office.

You claim that I'm biased but this is coming from someone who uses Phelps, a known disinformation agent and this Southern Israelite researcher, who, despite me agreeing with some of what he says, he is, nevertheless, a Freemason. So, you have been, unintentionally or intentionally, covering for Freemasonry and sourcing freemasons.

[–]HibikiBlack 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't think I've ever used Phelps as a direct source even once. Likewise, I also don't agree with a lot of what Drake says, but he is well sourced about his arguments to the point I can respect his points of view.

I never said that the Kennedys being secret protestants was factual, I actually said that it was just a rumour I heard. I don't get the butthurt behind this.

Also yeah, I don't think you are in anyway legit /u/Jesus. You admitted your hatred towards the flesh and of human subjectivity already. That's the basic principles behind everything the Jesuits do.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You continuously use Freemasons as sources. Hatred of flesh is not renouncement of flesh and its desires. There's a difference.

No, Jesus told us to preach the gospel and turn the other cheek. So, no, not a Jesuit. Jesus was clear that salvation only comes through Him.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bible is the Word of God.