Impact investing is predicated on power imbalance. What right do the poor, does nature, have to withhold consent from being "impacted" by billionaire techno-solutionism? It is NOT a program of benevolence, but rather one of domination and digital control.
militarized fin-tech has corralled the masses into their "cloud." Whose jurisdiction is it? Think about it. Today's " cloud" = the high seas of maritime trade. Human capital data commodities navigating pirates, sharks, and scurvy of the soul.
It does not make me feel good that the "ethics" framework for nano-tech development is based, in part, out of Arizona State - home of Michael Crow (founding board chair of In-Q-Tel) and Eric Schmidt / New America's Center For The Future Of War.