you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]turtlebam 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Someone who believes in the supremacy of the Jew, it doesn't even have to be a Jew. You would be surprised how many non Jews will do anything to please their masters.

Zionism was commonly referred to the idea of stealing the land of Palestine from its native Palestinian inhabitants and now it's about dominating and enslaving all non Jews (goys)

[–]Artistic-Mastodon-25 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Zionism was commonly referred to the idea of stealing the land of Palestine from its native Palestinian inhabitants

You mean the Jewish people who still live there? Or are only the Muslims entitled to call themselves "native inhabitants"?

When was the last time that the natives of that land governed themselves before the modern state of Israel?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

When was the last time that the natives of that land governed themselves before the modern state of Israel?

Never! And Israel didn't kick out all the muslims, shit they even let them keep that dome on the rock, something I would have blown up during the 6 day war if I had been in charge. I think some of the anti-joos here might be muslin astroturfers sewing discord myself.

[–]turtlebam 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Read my reply to your Hasbara troll buddy above, BTW you say Israel as if it existed. Remember in 1948 you were nothing but the terrorists of the stern gangs and irguns, the very first in the world to blow up buses and murder not only civilians but the very english officers who had helped you.

All the lands of Palestine were inhabited by Palestinians, up to the late 1800s there were practically no Jews in Palestine!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

And before 90AD it belonged to the jews, they were just exercising an historical claim is all. Personally I'd rather have them there than another saddist hussein or an eye-a-toldya-inhumainee, which would have been the result when the british moved out.

[–]turtlebam 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

LOL, so basically if they just spent (according to Jewish fables anyway) a 100 years 2000 years ago they can claim it as their own? First off, no one can verify 2000 years old lies, secondly, if you want to follow that logic; Gypsies should claim all of Europe and Asia as theirs since they spent many years in every spot.

Even according to Jewish logic, before them were the Canaanites Yabosean Arab clan, so Arabs were there even before the Jews. And most obviously Palestinians have a strong connection to the land, those villages and towns they are being removed from, were founded all by them and they can trace their lineage 300 years or more, while Jewish hordes immigrate from all over the world with no relation to the land except some religious fables.

And BTW Jews have killed more people all over the earth than Any Saddam Hussein or dictator have done, just look up what the Bolsheviks have done.

And BTW Khumeni of Iran is a Jewish agent, the wealthiest families in Iran are Jewish converts, even though they are traitors they might even make a war to kill off more innocent people, things are far more complicated than meets the eye. Jews are playing puppets with everyone.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Gypsies should claim all of Europe and Asia as theirs since they spent many years in every spot.

Sure, if they have the military might to do so. What happens on this planet has very little to do with right and wrong and everything to do with guns and ammo. Protesting invasions will get you nowhere if it's against the power structure of the time. The British gave up most of their empire after WWII, not because they loved the Indian peoples and all the others but because the consequences of military overstretch left them incapable of projecting the necessary force into their colonies. The French and Dutch pulled out for the same reasons.

What happened in the middle east was just more of the same, the Ottoman empire had run its course and could not fend off the British when they came down with their cannons and rifles. The wheel of history turns and turns but for now the middle east is in the grip of the western powers and will remain there until those powers collapse.

By then I expect they will have extracted all the Oil and the place will be a desert wasteland littered with depleted uranium. Egypt and Saudi Arabia, and a few others have adjusted to this and kowtowed to the western powers. They are vassal states essentially and while they are doing better now because of that their betrayal of their roots will ultimately assign them the same fate as their anti-US neighbors.

[–]turtlebam 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I cannot disagree with what you said, facts are to be acknowledged but moral legitimacy is another. To add to it, there are actually no anti-Us neighbors. Hafez Al Asad for example was a traitor as well who sold off the Golan heights, Saddam Hussein also worked for the US whom later betrayed him. They are all puppets. The english when they left off, also left behind puppet regimes whom some later become US puppets.

But at the moment the wheel of history seems to be that we are all puppets for the Zionists, even American and English citizens, even Jews themselves are being enslaved by the same machine they have created to enslave the world, it's more like machines run by a mad chabad lubavitcher against all of humanity.