Is it just a coincidence that the rollout of 5G coincides with the prevalence of coronavirus symptoms?

submitted by dontbuyanylogos from i.imgur.com

all 21 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 21 insightful - 4 fun21 insightful - 3 fun22 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Yes.

Countries rich enough to attract 5G builders, have the resources for health monitoring.

[–]astronautrob 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

This isn't true. Look at Derek Brozes research among others although his is the most in depth. This 5g thing with coronas only came about because wuhan is saturated with 5g already but if you look at other examples like Houston for instance they had 5g a year or two before conoras hit. There are many other examples like that. To play devil's advocate maybe they change the signal after putting in the towers or w.e, or maybe it takes time idk, but the fact is a lot of cities had 5g before this coronas thing hit. I would say rich countries are the ones with money to buy PCR tests and a more centralized society in general to administer those tests hence why they have more cases and deaths.

[–]dontbuyanylogos[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Reasonable counterargs there

[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Thanks for pointing it out, but I think you do well to play the devil's advocate. If a general correlation can be established, it'd still require an explanation. A few exceptions don't negate the entire correlation. That being said, this picture doesn't do anything unto itself to establish a correlation, and it doesn't provide a source. We need more data. But I'm really curious to see an in-depth analysis of this issue. It could also help us determine whether David Icke is a disinfo agent (which some of you might be convinced he is, but I have no problem with giving people the benefit of the doubt).

[–]astronautrob 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

How can there be a connection when Houston had 5g in early 2019? There aren't just a few exceptions there are a lot of cities that had 5g set up before this thing kicked off. Again look into brozes research, dude does a great job. Idk what in depth analysis you are specifically looking for but if you haven't read his research you should. Idk how much more in depth you'd want. There would have to be an alternate explanation, like towers weren't turned on signal changed etc., to explain how 5g could cause coronas in 2020 when it was set up a year or more ago, right? It's not discounting the entire correlation but there is obviously not a direct 1 to 1 thing here.

[–]LarrySwinger2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks, I'll look into his stuff. But that's the thing: you mentioned a possible explanation. Cities that have 5g but no epidemic do something to show a lack of correlation, but it's shown more satisfyingly if we can also point to places where there is an epidemic, but no 5g. If the pandemic is limited to places with 5g equipment, it's still suspicious.

[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes please do. Here is his documentary https://youtu.be/MWnyyiE5QlU, which is a good place to start but he also has many articles and other interviews, TLAV and THC to be specific, that he talks about it. Not trying to be rude but if you want to speak knowledgeably about this subject at least look at his research first. Idk how you haven't seen or read any of it yet if you've been researching the topic already. To your other point a quick research run would show that there are tons of cities and states just in the US that have 5g and don't have a (relatively) big outbreak. You can look at the list in this article https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.androidcentral.com/heres-every-us-city-5g-coverage-right-now%3famp. Very easy to find information the other way also, cities or states that have no 5g at all yet have outbreaks. Look at North or South Dakota. It's super easy to do research on this subject and, for the most part at least, dispell this correlation except for a few "well maybe this happened or this happened, etc." Types of situations. Like I said it could be a tandem thing. They put up these towers and they slowly make you sick then COVID comes and you get sicker type deal but to say 5g is causing COVID does not seem to be a true statement.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't believe in the whole 5g/corona thing, but to play devil's advocate myself, how active were 5G towers in Houston because nobody offered me 5G in '19. Might have been rather small scale.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

As of November 1, Rwanda and Senegal, for example, have reported 0.28 and 2.04 Covid deaths per 100,000 people respectively, while the corresponding number for the US is a staggering 70.4.

[–]Druullus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

...might come down to lack of testing?

[–]tomatosplat 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or bullshit numbers. Any death that could possibly be suspected as associated with covid is presented as such. The financial incentive for inflating mortality rates doesnt exist there, hence: no reason to lie.

If you take away motive, crimes do not come to fruition.

[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I heard that Africans have been subjected to diseases similar enough for their immune system to have adapted. Which sounds plausible. That'd explain this in particular.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It does sound plausible. Hopefully they'll look into that for the 2022 versions of the COVID vaccines .

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, but 5G is terrible for you and they greenwash it.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Time to head for the hills

[–]Vigte 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

What about Russia? Without foreign assistance they can't even get the networks running, nevermind the channels being occupied.

None of the mobile operators looks close to launching a mainstream 5G mobile service. If there is such a thing as a 5G "race" between different countries, Russia is merely a spectator.

While bad weather halted 19th-century Frenchmen, a lack of spectrum has bogged down 5G. Most other countries have settled on 3.4-3.8GHz as the optimal frequency real estate for the rollout of 5G services.

In Russia, those bands are still occupied by government agencies and the military. A discussion about freeing them up for the telecom sector has so far been fruitless.

11/19/2020

[–]tomatosplat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

5g is not noticeably faster for any day to day applications. It's not a very important advancement for our lives right now. Russia has bigger fish to fry.

[–]Jesus 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

5G is a worthless, energy-sucking, profit-margin increasing marketing pyramid scheme. 4G emf's are in thr frequency of 300mhz to 5ghz at the most, like a router. At these emfs, studies show they do decrease melatonin through VAAC channels. TO SAY THERE ARE NO BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS ON INSECTS or ANIMALS because it does not heat the cells is wrong.

5G is 20ghz - 95ghz! 75 - 95 ghz when concentrated is used as a weapon by the military for crowd control. The police have also looked into purchasing telepone poles for 5G instalments.

At these ghz, there are 1000's of studies showing deleterious effects of all types of animals, including bees and birds, butterflies and insects of all types. Humans are also impacted negatively through VAAC channels.

Now what's great about 5G? Is China doing it? You'd think thy are but they ha e far less installments than the US. Okay, what is the max recommendation for EMF exposure a at these frequencies by China 50x lower than the FCC limits, which means China, like most European countries care about its impact on people, or at least understand its POTENTIAL HARM in the long term.

The US cares about profit only.

They also greenwash 5G by telling us it is greener and will be great for the environment. Ahhhhh, if you think harming bees and the ecology of an environment is green, or that in order to provide the tremendous amount of data sucking that 5G transmits and recieves it would take thousands of more river diversions and cooling towers to cool data centres around the US.

Fucking stupid, but profit.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

At these emfs, studies show they do decrease melatonin through VAAC channels

Does that mean everyone is getting whiter? Oh wait, just looked that up, that's melanin...