you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]tomatosplat 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

I have a friend who was attached to (edit- can't remember the number of the division designation) marine amphibious division.. He told me flat out- their was on guard a marine platoon to block the parking garage and no one was to be let in-dignitaries or anything, on Sept 6-8 2001. I know somebody did it, but I doubt it was israel.

When you look around the table, and you can't tell who the sucker is: it's you.

[–]Jesus[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

It was 100% Israeli intelligence and the 5th column within the US government and executive order. It was the catylyzt for PNAC aspirations and the Yinon plan which is the Israeli plan for Global War on Terror facade.

Now, did non-Israeli linked US government officials and think tanks likely know what was to transpire? Yes sure. But all we have to do is see who owned, operated, was the security, stopped litigation, and covered-up the event, in every position sat q ZioCon aligned with the Likud.

Why was Bush reading a children's book in Florida? Observe his face and you can clearly see that he was fooled. That now he understood why he was selected as president.

9/11 was a hijacked theory. That is, many different groups were able to use it FOR THEIR OWN AGENDAS. The US in Adghanistan for UNOCAL. Israel for Yinon, and Balkenization campaign as well as the Askanaz pipeline.

Rabbi Dov Zakhiem, SPC, unaccounted for trillions, he as comptroller at the Pentagon, him working for a company that soecializes in remote-guided passenger jet systems, and working formerally for Tridata which redid the fireproofing in WTC7, suggests a Zionist job.

Read: Christopher Bollyn, David Ray Griffin and Graeme MacQueen.

[–]tomatosplat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

WTC7 did not catch on fire, official story is that they demolished it on purpose to reduce the risk of fires spreading. That is not disputed.

(It was at first, but they got caught because 200 million people watched it live on TV- and half of them heard the call for the demolition)

Also, why would you need a remote control when there are billions of hajis ready and willing to die flying it. Hajis are cheaper than modified airliners.

I have no doubt that some of the people involved were Jewish, Muslim, and Catholic, that does not prove that the pope or ben netanyahu called the shots. You don't have to go overseas to find people that want to destroy the US from the inside-out.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You might want to double check your "official story" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center

[–]tomatosplat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Something besides wikipedia's please. That's just shit that's added by your average internet user, fact checked against another typical internet user.

Wikipedia is about as credible a source as the cat walking across the keyboard- being auto-corrected by microsoft.

You got an official from World, or Brittanica?

Or how about an investigative journalist (they used to exist) https://canada.constructconnect.com/dcn/news/others/2020/05/world-trade-center-7-building-did-not-collapse-due-to-fire-report

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Sorry bro, I only research the unofficial story. If you want to tell me how many nukes Israel has though, I may reconsider.

[–]tomatosplat 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

As many as LBJ sent.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Hey, you're alright. Seriously though, wikipedia exists to solidify the mainstream narrative concerning events. It is the most reliable source for the official narrative. If you want references, they are there. NIST decided, that's that.

[–]tomatosplat 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Thought i'd posted this reply, sorry-https://wtcdata.nist.gov/

The whole website is working, except this page...wonder why?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]tomatosplat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was guna add the NIST response, but "they're doing maintenance"https://wtcdata.nist.gov/