There is no pandemic.

submitted by discountmeat from self.conspiracy

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1889%E2%80%931890_pandemic

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Suspected cases 300-900 million (estimate)
Deaths 1 million (estimate)

Once again we see the most absurd exactly range of cases being reported. 300-900 million

An estimate of 1900 global population is 1.56 - 1.71 billion. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimates_of_historical_world_population

The idea that 300-900 million people could have caught this dubious pandemic flu is just as laughable as the casedemic sham of 2020.

In fact, I'm starting to have doubts about the reality of the Spanish Flu.

Just about every photo I can find looks staged.

Have a look for yourself.

https://www.startpage.com/do/dsearch?query=Spanish+flu+pandemic+photos&cat=web&pl=opensearch

Almost all of the people are wearing masks (in 1919?), and/or doing everyday indoor activities outside.

The people in the hospitals photos look healthy (more or less).
Typically, they're propped up on an elbow, or sitting on a cot for the camera.

50,000,000 allegedly died. 50,000,000!!!?

We should see mass graves, or hospitals where the ill are completely bedridden and struggling to survive.

Something hideous at a minimum. Like the civil war photos, or similar. Cities that were emptied, etc.

Photos like that would sell a lot of newspapers.

Instead, we see staged nonsense.

It's hardly credible.

Back to the Russian pandemic.

The 12 January 1890, edition of the Paris satirical magazine Le Grelot [fr] depicted an unfortunate influenza sufferer bowled along by a parade of doctors, druggists, skeleton musicians and dancing girls representing quinine and antipyrine

Satire references. I wouldn't be surprised if it was an early hoax. Pandemic hoaxes everywhere.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

As Tom Bombadil itself is a riddle in LOTR i won't answer to any of you hypothesises so far.

You aren't even able to dissect all my climate change arguments which you nevertheless claim to be a hoax. From a rhetorical standpoint so far it would be unwise to widen my front for your alleged dissections which only are as hollow as they are unwise.

There isn't even one better source in your rant.

A real logician or advocate (even a campaigner...) would look into the sources that this part of the wikipedia is made of instead of just denying reality.

Even though i fight quite the boomer here, i choose tactics and terrain here so far since your choices are obviously obselete.

Other than ranting i can see not even one argument.

See? That is why Tom Bombadil should stay in the woods he became insane in.

Do you know what a tactical delay is ? Well guess what: This is one.

Where Gandalf may or may not die in the process.

Just stay the joke your obselete character is. Millenials fight with arguments which you are quite short of at this point in time.

At this point i know how to poke holes into your reality but you're not even close to mine.

I studied with books and such. You are just boring me. So you are wasting my time on this planet.

You are just a blue character defending a reality that isn't even yours. Like my soon-to-be father in law.

Either accept your dementia or get a grip.

Purple is not like a white shadowed blue is. Purple is progressive and obviously a mixture of blue and red, while you are dying with a white shadow closing in on your mind.

You can't even remember when i'm citing myself on wikipedia, i bet.

We are the bosses of your offspring now. If you like it or not.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

You aren't even able to dissect all my climate change arguments which you nevertheless claim to be a hoax.

I ignored your anecdotes, and instead described in detail the physical flaw in the climate change hoax.

You pretend to have a technical background, and I included reminders of the basics in the explanation.

It's obvious that you're a pretending to understand physics and chemistry basics.

Central point refutation. Top of the Pyramid.

The physical reality is gases can only absorb/emit narrow and discrete bands of EM radiation. Period.

Gases have no lattice structure and cannot behave as a greenhouse analogue. Period.

So-called greenhouse gases are functionally transparent to virtually all IR that is emitted from the surface (+99%)and the IR is emitted into space, because IR is emitted in a broad spectrum.

Gases have no lattice structure and cannot behave as a greenhouse analogue.

They cannot trap heat as the climate hoax argument goes.

Game over.

At this point i know how to poke holes into your reality but you're not even close to mine.

Poke.

I studied with books and such. You are just boring me. So you are wasting my time on this planet.

Really??? You "studied with books and such"?

That's hilarious.

They must have been joke books... ;-)

[–]C3P0 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

At this point, /u/ElifromtheBook and your commentary has devolved into mostly personal attacks rather than attacks on the argument itself. [you] this, [you] that.