you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

That's right. A lot of the anti-Semitic ideals that the National Socialists followed were inspired by the writtings of the Jesuits, too. Overall, their group took a lot of traits from them. It all started with their anti-Semitic propaganda in their magazine La Civilita Cattolica:

https://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/23/books/chapters/the-popes-against-the-jews.html

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Civilta cattolica's century-long campaign against the Jews...

Which, Jews?

Observing that the journal only changed course in 1965, in the wake of the Second Vatican Council.

Yes, during the subversion and infiltration of the Church by Zionists and Talmudics as has been done in the protestant sects.

"It is necessary, however," he adds, "to note that these [hostile articles] were not a matter of 'anti-Semitism,' the essential ingredient of which is hatred against the Jews because of their 'race,' but rather anti-Judaism.

You forget that tib bit. That traditional Catholics expose Judaism as a religion and ethno-nationalist identity, not as a race. Anti-Semitism, a word you like to use, was hijacked by Zionist Jews, specifically ZioFascists on the rightist spectrum, such as the Likud. Palestinian Arabs and many Arab muslims ARE SEMITIC. So, being anti-Semitic implies that a person must then oppose the languages of Arabic and Hebrew. Does the Irgun oppose the Arabic language? Probably, but this means nothing,. Do those who criticize Jewish supremacism, Zionism and Israel oppose the Hebew language, no, they do not. So, we must conclude that this term does not make any sense. It is a misnomer.

Traditional Catholcis and most real Christians are anti-Judaic. That means they oppose Judaism which rejects Christ. Yeshua told everyone of his followers to turn the other cheek. Judaism tells their adherents an eye-for-an-eye. The Talmud teaches all sorts of anti-Christian and supremacist doctrine as does the Zohar and Lurianic cabala, which was written to subvert the word of God. Knowing all of this, it makes perfect sense why meek Christians would love their enemies but expose the principalities of darknes. That meek Christians would do good unto others but so too reject Judaism as a religion. Hence, be opposed to Judaism.

The atheistical "Jews"; a new identity that stemmed from a persecution complex started in the 15th century, are considered by religious Jews to be apostates, and by their more Orthodox members, "fake Jews." My question to you: Why are they Jews then? What makes them Jews? If they reject the rabbinical God, how can they be Jews but also atheistic? Many reasons: 1.) they are ethno-nationalists; covert or overt and are loyal to the Zionist settler state 2.) Their religion is Holocaustianity which is propagandized by political Zionism as a way to integrate all "Jews" for their settler project 3.) holding onto the traditions of Judaism and their ancestors judaism barred of its religosity 4.) they reject Christ; for neither Jew, nor Greek, nor Roman are brothers in Christ. (Do not take this statement to mean that none of these nationalities and religions can renounce their identity to follow Christ). They renounce their nationalism and Jewishness and place their hearts and mind on Christ. For it is their fruits that must be observed. Salvation is in Christ and accepting Him comes with living a rightful life and turning your eye unto God.

...which opposes and combats the Jews for religious and social reasons."

Social reasons, yes, because following Christ, who was the Jewish messiah, has far different social ramificatios than the cult religion of Judaism which is merely the law of men.

...that the Jews battled the Church, that they practiced the ritual murder of Christian children, that they had enormous political power in their hands to the point of controlling governments and, above all, that they possessed great wealth, earned by usury, and thus had incredibly strong economic influence, which they used to the detriment of Christianity and Christian peoples." Father De Rosa adds, quite correctly, that the Jesuit journal was not alone in making such accusations, for they filled the pages of many mainstream Catholic publications.

All is true. Look at the Zionist Jews behind 9/11, the war in Iraq and the US government, who work hand-in-hand with noahide Freemasons of the Northern and Southern masonic divisions of the US and the fascist P2 lodge in Italy through the World Brotherhood Corporation, Permindex, CMC, and the Jewish owned Seligman bank in Switzerland, of whose family member, Joseph Seligman, was part and parcel of introducing income tax and permanent public debt to the American people, even before he acquired his citizenship! Look at what Zionist Jews: secular, atheistical, religiously orthodox; hasidic Chabadism or other Orthodox Talmudic sects, did to the church and how so easily they subvert and control evangelicalism. How they use it to their benefit for the war call on their amaleks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKgHfJ1BVtA

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/50127071-on-the-trail-of-clay-shaw

https://www.amazon.com/Judaism-Vatican-Attempt-Spiritual-Subversion/dp/B004SRAWZ4/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1594721614&sr=1-3

https://www.amazon.com/Freemasonry-Judaism-Secret-Powers-Revolution/dp/1617590444/ref=pd_bxgy_img_2/140-6604168-5720567?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=1617590444&pd_rd_r=b4aec0b3-20a1-48e8-96c2-b1e7364a45dc&pd_rd_w=4Unx6&pd_rd_wg=xLz1Z&pf_rd_p=ce6c479b-ef53-49a6-845b-bbbf35c28dd3&pf_rd_r=2CN4QKD7ZG98WC6M9ZX8&psc=1&refRID=2CN4QKD7ZG98WC6M9ZX8

https://www.amazon.com/You-Gentiles-Maurice-Samuel/dp/1643701169/ref=pd_sbs_14_6/140-6604168-5720567?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=1643701169&pd_rd_r=e614ee17-e671-449c-81d4-4b839c42cd8b&pd_rd_w=JLlDz&pd_rd_wg=4ErOi&pf_rd_p=b65ee94e-1282-43fc-a8b1-8bf931f6dfab&pf_rd_r=568SJGBY6V4GWQFQNA3W&psc=1&refRID=568SJGBY6V4GWQFQNA3W

Was ritual murder a hoax, no, was it exaggerated by some and put as a looming sin over the whole of Judaism, yes.

https://ia800700.us.archive.org/13/items/BloodPassoveredited/BloodPassoverByToaffEdited.pdf

'Blood Passover' written by a Jew illustrates that ritual murder orchestrated on Christian children by certain cabalist Jews did happen.

Do certain Jews have enormous political power? Yes, of course! Do certain Jews control the US governemnt, yes, with noahide Freemasons, yes. Do they possess great wealth? Not all, but Jews are the richest of personhoods in the US. They account for 25% of billionaires, despite them being 2% of the population and in their holy texts are pro-Usury! Talmudic hasidic Jews that follow the Rebbe say that all Jews should strive to be rich in wealth, and they do not mean rich in the spirit of Christ, but rich in money. Was some of their great wealth acquired by usury? Yes, for their religion allows usury, where Islam and Christianity do not. Solzhenitsyn makes this clear in his book '200 Years Together',

...thus had incredibly strong economic influence, which they used to the detriment of Christianity and Christian peoples.

Certain Jews, yes, and also non-Jews and anti-Christian Catholic Christian democrats themselves who work hand-in-hand with noahide Freemasons. Meaning they are not Christians nor Catholics at all. The religious Jews are pro-Usury and so they can lend at interest onto the non-Jews, hence, this is certainly a detriment to Christian peoples. For the whole system is one based on usury and that was of course initiated by Jewish bankers such as Rothschild and co., through the lackey Belmont; Seligman, Kuhn, Loeb, Schiff, Warburg, Lehman, Hamilton etc., all Jews and other Shabbos goys who believe usury to be some sort of virtue.

Father De Rosa adds, quite correctly, that the Jesuit journal was not alone in making such accusations, for they filled the pages of many mainstream Catholic publications.

And that is a good thing. For everything I have said here is what is happening today. Is it Judaism's fault as a whole? No. Rather, it is sin that caused all of this to happen. It is Jews and non-Jews alike, including Catholics in neology only that reject Christ and continue to go on in sin.

By way of illustration of Civilta cattolica 's anti-Judaism (as opposed to anti-Semitism), he offers some passages from articles in the journal authored by Fathers Rondina and Ballerini in the 1890s. These tell of Jews' thirst for world domination, their hunger for gold, and their belief that Christians are no better than animals.

Anti-Judaism has always been a Christian doctrine. Christ told us that "They call themselves Jews but are not, but are the synagouge of satan."

Meaning that modern "Jews" today are not Jews at all. They frequent synagouges but have not Christ in them. The Jews that went onto follow Christ renounced their Jewishness, as did the gentiles, who renounced thier Roman and Greek nationalism and followed Christ.

Secondly, anti-Judaism implies that Christians are anti-Judaism of religion. It does not say that one should destroy Judaism but rather try to convert them through peaceful means by preaching "The Way', as many Chrsitians often do in Israel. These Christians are stoned and spat on and many times jailed by Israeli law enformcement for trumped up charges. One can go back to the days of Solomons temple and oberseve the Gold and money-lenders within the halls of synagouges. Outwardly, they were seen as God's people, but inwardly, they were of dead mans bones.They had God not in them.

These tell of Jews' thirst for world domination, their hunger for gold, and their belief that Christians are no better than animals.

Certain Jews, such as the integrationalist Chabadniks that back Putin, Netanyahu and Trump do want world dominion over the Christian through noahidism! Secondly, they do have a hunger for wealth , and third their holy books including the Lurianic cabala and Talmud explain that non-jews have no better souls than animals and are satanic. That non-Jews are only born to serve the divinity of Jews.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Hahaha. They only edited the hardcore parts to sound less edgy. There were times in which Jesuit media actually encouraged the "extermination of Jews". The psyop continues to this day, with the whole alt-right movement being pushed by the CIA online.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Hahaha. They only edited the hardcore parts to sound less edgy. There were times in which Jesuit media actually encouraged the "extermination of Jews". The psyop continues to this day, with the whole alt-right movement being pushed by the CIA online.

Our current Pope is a Converso Jesuit Jew who pushes Noahidism.

In addition, Herzl the founder of Zionism called for the persecution of his own kind to emigrate Jews to Israel.

I do not deny that the Papacy commited atrocities; that stoic anti-Usury was put on the backburner and sects within the Church used the sword... that being said, today, traditional Catholics are no more.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Irrelevant. I haven't even seen that much convincing evidence that Francis could be a Jew. Even if he were, It's not like he is an actual "crypto Jew" but rather, the whole thing is backwards. He gave up the Jewish identity to become a Jesuit.

Simply put, the background of the Jesuits for political subversion goes way back, like their communist movements in Latin America. So now just because some of their members could have Jewish backgrounds, the whole thing becomes a Jewish plot? Despite the fact that Jews were banned from their group when they had already commited many crimes? When they constantly used the Jews as scapegoats? The mental leaps you do are incredible.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I gave you all the info needed to illustrate that Francis pushes all the noahide laws and now says LGBTQ communities views are natural and of God. 8 gender laws of the Talmudics say the same thing. He quotes from the Talmud! What does that tell you? You ignore my information by using historical information that was true then but can not be applied in this situation.

He's acts as if he is a marrano, period.

Yes, the whole plot is that of the converso marranos and Masons. They are pushing noahide laws which goes hand-in-hand with Freemasonry as they too are noahides and now they want to bring together Talmudism and Catholicism, which is exactly what marrano scribes want to do!

Inalready posted elsewhere that Freemasonry was largely a Talmudic-masonic endeavour. That does not mean the majority were Talmudics.

Yeshua says the Papacy is the beast and that there is a conspiracy in Jerusalem. The conspiracy is that of the Talmudics taking control of the papacy to bring about their "Jewish" moshiach, who is Jewish in name only. The Freemasons are noahides, so they automatically are not enemies of this anti-Christ strongman. Christians who confess to Christ are enemies.

Remember, Talmudics are not Jews. Only those that follow Christ are Jews. Modern day Jews are anti-Christ. The individual who orchestrated 9/11; had a strong hand in its planning was Rabbi Dov Zakheim, a Talmudist.

They call themsleves Jews but according to Christ, they are of the synagogue of Satan.

Sure, the traditional Catholics used the Templars and old Jesuits to destroy their enemies, which was seriously corrupt and unjust but they do not control the vatican today. Bergoglio IS NOT a traditional Catholic he is a futurist and pushes exactly what talmudics push, word for word. I'm basing this off what I see and hear.

Why do the Freemasons love Bergoglio? Freemasonry wished to destroy the Catholic church through infiltration. The old Jesuits were always an enemy of the Freemasons, so what happened? It appears Bergoglio is a noahide and follows the Talmudic anti-Christ agenda, which goes hand in hand with Freemasonry and "Jewish" infiltration.

Simply put, the background of the Jesuits for political subversion goes way back, like their communist movements in Latin America.

Great, I'm talking about after the 2nd Vatican council.

So now just because some of their members could have Jewish backgrounds, the whole thing becomes a Jewish plot?

No, real Jews follow Christ. It is an anti-Christ plot orchestrated by Marrano's, Zionists, Masons, noahides and Talmudics.

Despite the fact that Jews were banned from their group when they had already commited many crimes?

No, the old Jesuits and marranos both committed crimes. I don't doubt that. "Jews" are now allowed to become Jesuits and likely were Jesuits after the blood purity law stopped being enforced. There are transcripts of marranos against old Jesuits and vice versa. They both made their contentions, they both stood against each other. In the end, the old Jesuits appear to have lost the papacy; and that becomes obvious when you take into account their opposition to Freemasonry of which Bergoglio invites Freemasonry and Zionist Protestantism to become one with the Church.

When they constantly used the Jews as scapegoats? The mental leaps you do are incredible.

They did, and humanist "Jews", unfortunately, do not seem to ever expose the fake Jews who orchestrated 9/11 or their infiltration of the Church with their masonic, Talmudic and P2/P3 right-wing Grand Orient friends.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

This is all coming from the guy that said real Jews were all psychopaths not so long ago...

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Show me exactly where I said that?

/u/useless_aether did the same to me; he claimed I commented some occult link that he said was me trying to seduce him with satanic imagery. I found that comment, and I never commented it, it was someone else; I sent him the link and even then he continued to say it was me. So, provide the comment and right here and now I will say I do not think "Jews" are psychopaths but I do think the Talmud and Lurianic cabala breed psychopaths.

You also asked why I trust the information/site I post. As if trust has anything to do with facts. Then you ignored the post on Bergoglio who hangs out with Talmudics who think that non-Jews are not human and Yeshua is boiling in feces. He often quotes the Talmud which is anti-Christ. Why are Freemasons so enthusiastic about Bergoglio? The Church was always against Freemasons. And now knowing that Protestant Zionists, the CIA and Zionists killed JFK it appears the Jesuit myth is a fraud. That the myth is centered around the old historical Jesuits. They are Jesuits working for Noahide Freemasons. So if the Jesuits were always against Freemasons, why is this Pope inviting Freemasons to speak on his behalf?

I never said real Jews were psychopaths. I base my faith on Yeshua who told his followers that they call themselves Jews but are not. That they are of the synagogue of Satan. Who frequents synagogues? You say Jews, I say anti-Christs. Christ was the "Jew" of God's new covenant with a spiritual Israel. Most "Jews" today are not biblical Jews of the old covenant and even more of them are not Semitic.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Why are "Jews" "Jews" then.

Are you a follower of Christ?

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, I believe the figure of Jesus is simply a deification/mythological character based on Julius Caesar:

https://www.carotta.de/subseite/texte/esumma.html

Constantine eventually took the figure to make Christianity the main religion of Rome, with the whole thing being his psyop. Then the Jesuits came along and corrupted Catholicism a lot further with their neo-platonism etc...

I honestly don't get why so much people place so much value in the Christian and Jewish holy books. The story of Enkidu and Gilgamesh predates both by a long mile, we've been around for far longer than any of these clowns. Well, I actually do, the power of the Vatican comes from them. I myself am an agnostic. I also like to practice some of the ascetic traditions of the "Santeros", but I still mostly do my own thing.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A deification of Caesar? Polycarp was killed by Caesar and the Romans for simply following Christ and calling himself a Christian.

http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/caesars.html

Quote from Come-and-hear.com:

There is no doubt that Jesus of Nazareth and the Pharisees had a violent dislike for each other. This point has been a delicate one between Jews and Christians ever since. The tension, however, provides a good object lesson on the use of euphemisms and code words used in the Talmud to censor or obscure the meaning of the text.

(Unless otherwise indicated, in the following excerpts we have omitted the Soncino footnotes. To study the footnotes and the full context, follow the link below the excerpt.)

Let us look at this short excerpt from Tractate Sanhedrin. Speaking of a character called "Balaam," a Sage states:

GEMARA. … He practised enchantment by means of his membrum.

In the opinion of many modern rabbinical scholars, "Balaam" was often used by the Sages as an alias or code word for Jesus of Nazareth. For example, consider this statement about Balaam from the prestigious Jewish Encyclopedia:

Henceforth he became the type of false prophets seducing men to lewdness and obscene idolatrous practices (Rev. ii. 14; II Peter ii. 15; Jude 11; Abot. v. 19). The name 'Nicolaitanes,' given to the Christian heretics 'holding the doctrine of Balaam' (Rev. ii. 6, 15), is probably derived from the Grecized form of Balaam, [Hebr. char.] = [Greek char.], and hence also the pseudonym given to Jesus in Sanh. 106b and Git. 57a.

The Jewish Encyclopedia's article on Jesus contains much information about various pseudonyms used for Jesus in the Talmud, including "Balaam," "son of Pandera," and "Ben Stada."

Why would the Sages use a code word for Jesus of Nazareth? Perhaps to avoid confrontations with the Christian establishment. By disguising unflattering remarks about Jesus, only those inside the circle of Talmud believers would understand; Christians, if they ever saw the material, would miss the significance. An example is given by Rabbi Rodkinson in his book, The History of the Talmud. In 1239 A.D., Jewish apostates brought charges in Rome that the Talmud contained sacrilegious sayings about Jesus and His mother. Rabbi Jechial answered the charges (in part) by denying that the Talmud contained any mention of Jesus of Nazareth:

To the other accusations of Donin, that the Talmud terms the followers of Jesus Christ "Minim" (infidels), that it condemns Jesus, that it allows ill-usage of people of other nationalities, etc., he [Rabbi Jechial] replied: "In the Talmud there is no mention of Jesus (Jesu) Christ, but only of another Jesus (Jeshua) who was a disciple of R. Joshua b. Prachia, who lived two hundred years before Christ."

— Rabbi Rodkinson

In a footnote, Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman promotes scholar Rev. Dr. Herford's view that the "harlot" is a reference to Mary, mother of Jesus.

Herford, Christianity in the Talmud, p. 48, suggests that Balaam is frequently used in the Talmud as a type for Jesus … Though no name is mentioned to shew which woman is meant, the mother of Jesus may be alluded to, which theory is strengthened by the statement that she mated with a carpenter.

http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/censorship_2.html

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, Pagan Romans wanted to hijack the apostles teachings and institutionalize it, as "The Way" following way quite revolutionary in it's understanding of law and love. Before they institutionalized it, they murdered plenty of "The Way" followers.

Then the Jesuits came along and corrupted Catholicism a lot further with their neo-platonism etc...

LaRouche says that... Reach Christopher Hollis books on the Jesuits. Again, there were two orders opposed to each other who took the name of the Jesuits. Both were corrupt. Today, the US is new Rome and the synagogue of Satan and Noahide Freemasons are at the helm.

I honestly don't get why so much people place so much value in the Christian and Jewish holy books.

Because Christianity is what PAGANS called persons who followed Yeshua. Again, read Yeshua's words ONLY, clearly the old covanant is over and the new covanent of preaching "The Way" and following Christ is the creators doing. Yeshua said to turn the other cheek.

Because Yeshua's words are the truth, period.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Provide the comment/source... thanks. Until then, you're putting words in my mouth.