The Catholic Church stole at least 300,000 Spanish babies and still faces trials because of its crimes to this day.

submitted by HibikiBlackCaudillo from ranker.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Hahaha. They only edited the hardcore parts to sound less edgy. There were times in which Jesuit media actually encouraged the "extermination of Jews". The psyop continues to this day, with the whole alt-right movement being pushed by the CIA online.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Evidently, you do not want to debunk anything I've had to say. Instead, your first sentence is degrading and merely shows that you have no logical refuation for at least arguing your point of view or answering any of the questions I have asked.

Hahaha. They only edited the hardcore parts to sound less edgy.

What are you even talking about? Darby dispensationalism is anti-Christ. I could give you hundreds of verses manipulated by Jews, who use the anti-Semitic canard to manipulate the word of God. And what about edgy? Are you 12 years old? Do you follow Christ? Are you a Christian? But that is not the point, the point is Zionists and Talmudists have taken over the Church, period. As they have done in the protestant sects.

There were times in which Jesuit media actually encouraged the "extermination of Jews".

Lke where? Which Jesuit media? Who owned that media? Secondly, many Jesuits were detained and thrown in concentration camps in Germany and Russia.

"extermination of Jews"

There was not a 6 million figure holocaust; though Jews were persecuted heavily by National Socialists. I am not denying that.

Secondly, you completely ignore all of my arguments and have, like your post above posted the same argument with nothing to back it up, other than saying that Jews are a persecuted people and that "Jesuits control" the whole of the alt-right pushed by the CIA online. Which just is not true. I have a paper that I wrote illustrating the utter over-representation of Jews in media, to the point that it is laughable.

So, wait, if the Jesuits were against the marrano Jews in the Jesuit order and thought their only goal was to subvert the church, and if the Likudniks work with noahide Freemassons of various masonic orders with the CIA that has been heavily infiltrated by Jews and neoconservatives at odds with the traditional republicans such as Smith and other directors who stood by JFK, then why did they assassinate JFK, if he himself was a Catholic? That's right, because the current Jesuits today, after the 2nd Vatican council, have subverted and infiltrated the Church and are crypto Talmudics pushing Noahidism.

I already posted the anti-Christ things Francis has said about Yeshua which is exactly what the Talmudics preach. If anything else, Zionist Jews are working with every other society to infiltrate and hijack any institution or people that represents Christ. They have the Vatican, and that is obvious. I'm not going to post anymore, because you argue with red-herrings and bring nothing to the table.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Hahaha. They only edited the hardcore parts to sound less edgy. There were times in which Jesuit media actually encouraged the "extermination of Jews". The psyop continues to this day, with the whole alt-right movement being pushed by the CIA online.

Our current Pope is a Converso Jesuit Jew who pushes Noahidism.

In addition, Herzl the founder of Zionism called for the persecution of his own kind to emigrate Jews to Israel.

I do not deny that the Papacy commited atrocities; that stoic anti-Usury was put on the backburner and sects within the Church used the sword... that being said, today, traditional Catholics are no more.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Irrelevant. I haven't even seen that much convincing evidence that Francis could be a Jew. Even if he were, It's not like he is an actual "crypto Jew" but rather, the whole thing is backwards. He gave up the Jewish identity to become a Jesuit.

Simply put, the background of the Jesuits for political subversion goes way back, like their communist movements in Latin America. So now just because some of their members could have Jewish backgrounds, the whole thing becomes a Jewish plot? Despite the fact that Jews were banned from their group when they had already commited many crimes? When they constantly used the Jews as scapegoats? The mental leaps you do are incredible.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I gave you all the info needed to illustrate that Francis pushes all the noahide laws and now says LGBTQ communities views are natural and of God. 8 gender laws of the Talmudics say the same thing. He quotes from the Talmud! What does that tell you? You ignore my information by using historical information that was true then but can not be applied in this situation.

He's acts as if he is a marrano, period.

Yes, the whole plot is that of the converso marranos and Masons. They are pushing noahide laws which goes hand-in-hand with Freemasonry as they too are noahides and now they want to bring together Talmudism and Catholicism, which is exactly what marrano scribes want to do!

Inalready posted elsewhere that Freemasonry was largely a Talmudic-masonic endeavour. That does not mean the majority were Talmudics.

Yeshua says the Papacy is the beast and that there is a conspiracy in Jerusalem. The conspiracy is that of the Talmudics taking control of the papacy to bring about their "Jewish" moshiach, who is Jewish in name only. The Freemasons are noahides, so they automatically are not enemies of this anti-Christ strongman. Christians who confess to Christ are enemies.

Remember, Talmudics are not Jews. Only those that follow Christ are Jews. Modern day Jews are anti-Christ. The individual who orchestrated 9/11; had a strong hand in its planning was Rabbi Dov Zakheim, a Talmudist.

They call themsleves Jews but according to Christ, they are of the synagogue of Satan.

Sure, the traditional Catholics used the Templars and old Jesuits to destroy their enemies, which was seriously corrupt and unjust but they do not control the vatican today. Bergoglio IS NOT a traditional Catholic he is a futurist and pushes exactly what talmudics push, word for word. I'm basing this off what I see and hear.

Why do the Freemasons love Bergoglio? Freemasonry wished to destroy the Catholic church through infiltration. The old Jesuits were always an enemy of the Freemasons, so what happened? It appears Bergoglio is a noahide and follows the Talmudic anti-Christ agenda, which goes hand in hand with Freemasonry and "Jewish" infiltration.

Simply put, the background of the Jesuits for political subversion goes way back, like their communist movements in Latin America.

Great, I'm talking about after the 2nd Vatican council.

So now just because some of their members could have Jewish backgrounds, the whole thing becomes a Jewish plot?

No, real Jews follow Christ. It is an anti-Christ plot orchestrated by Marrano's, Zionists, Masons, noahides and Talmudics.

Despite the fact that Jews were banned from their group when they had already commited many crimes?

No, the old Jesuits and marranos both committed crimes. I don't doubt that. "Jews" are now allowed to become Jesuits and likely were Jesuits after the blood purity law stopped being enforced. There are transcripts of marranos against old Jesuits and vice versa. They both made their contentions, they both stood against each other. In the end, the old Jesuits appear to have lost the papacy; and that becomes obvious when you take into account their opposition to Freemasonry of which Bergoglio invites Freemasonry and Zionist Protestantism to become one with the Church.

When they constantly used the Jews as scapegoats? The mental leaps you do are incredible.

They did, and humanist "Jews", unfortunately, do not seem to ever expose the fake Jews who orchestrated 9/11 or their infiltration of the Church with their masonic, Talmudic and P2/P3 right-wing Grand Orient friends.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

This is all coming from the guy that said real Jews were all psychopaths not so long ago...

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Show me exactly where I said that?

/u/useless_aether did the same to me; he claimed I commented some occult link that he said was me trying to seduce him with satanic imagery. I found that comment, and I never commented it, it was someone else; I sent him the link and even then he continued to say it was me. So, provide the comment and right here and now I will say I do not think "Jews" are psychopaths but I do think the Talmud and Lurianic cabala breed psychopaths.

You also asked why I trust the information/site I post. As if trust has anything to do with facts. Then you ignored the post on Bergoglio who hangs out with Talmudics who think that non-Jews are not human and Yeshua is boiling in feces. He often quotes the Talmud which is anti-Christ. Why are Freemasons so enthusiastic about Bergoglio? The Church was always against Freemasons. And now knowing that Protestant Zionists, the CIA and Zionists killed JFK it appears the Jesuit myth is a fraud. That the myth is centered around the old historical Jesuits. They are Jesuits working for Noahide Freemasons. So if the Jesuits were always against Freemasons, why is this Pope inviting Freemasons to speak on his behalf?

I never said real Jews were psychopaths. I base my faith on Yeshua who told his followers that they call themselves Jews but are not. That they are of the synagogue of Satan. Who frequents synagogues? You say Jews, I say anti-Christs. Christ was the "Jew" of God's new covenant with a spiritual Israel. Most "Jews" today are not biblical Jews of the old covenant and even more of them are not Semitic.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Why are "Jews" "Jews" then.

Are you a follower of Christ?

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, I believe the figure of Jesus is simply a deification/mythological character based on Julius Caesar:

https://www.carotta.de/subseite/texte/esumma.html

Constantine eventually took the figure to make Christianity the main religion of Rome, with the whole thing being his psyop. Then the Jesuits came along and corrupted Catholicism a lot further with their neo-platonism etc...

I honestly don't get why so much people place so much value in the Christian and Jewish holy books. The story of Enkidu and Gilgamesh predates both by a long mile, we've been around for far longer than any of these clowns. Well, I actually do, the power of the Vatican comes from them. I myself am an agnostic. I also like to practice some of the ascetic traditions of the "Santeros", but I still mostly do my own thing.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A deification of Caesar? Polycarp was killed by Caesar and the Romans for simply following Christ and calling himself a Christian.

http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/caesars.html

Quote from Come-and-hear.com:

There is no doubt that Jesus of Nazareth and the Pharisees had a violent dislike for each other. This point has been a delicate one between Jews and Christians ever since. The tension, however, provides a good object lesson on the use of euphemisms and code words used in the Talmud to censor or obscure the meaning of the text.

(Unless otherwise indicated, in the following excerpts we have omitted the Soncino footnotes. To study the footnotes and the full context, follow the link below the excerpt.)

Let us look at this short excerpt from Tractate Sanhedrin. Speaking of a character called "Balaam," a Sage states:

GEMARA. … He practised enchantment by means of his membrum.

In the opinion of many modern rabbinical scholars, "Balaam" was often used by the Sages as an alias or code word for Jesus of Nazareth. For example, consider this statement about Balaam from the prestigious Jewish Encyclopedia:

Henceforth he became the type of false prophets seducing men to lewdness and obscene idolatrous practices (Rev. ii. 14; II Peter ii. 15; Jude 11; Abot. v. 19). The name 'Nicolaitanes,' given to the Christian heretics 'holding the doctrine of Balaam' (Rev. ii. 6, 15), is probably derived from the Grecized form of Balaam, [Hebr. char.] = [Greek char.], and hence also the pseudonym given to Jesus in Sanh. 106b and Git. 57a.

The Jewish Encyclopedia's article on Jesus contains much information about various pseudonyms used for Jesus in the Talmud, including "Balaam," "son of Pandera," and "Ben Stada."

Why would the Sages use a code word for Jesus of Nazareth? Perhaps to avoid confrontations with the Christian establishment. By disguising unflattering remarks about Jesus, only those inside the circle of Talmud believers would understand; Christians, if they ever saw the material, would miss the significance. An example is given by Rabbi Rodkinson in his book, The History of the Talmud. In 1239 A.D., Jewish apostates brought charges in Rome that the Talmud contained sacrilegious sayings about Jesus and His mother. Rabbi Jechial answered the charges (in part) by denying that the Talmud contained any mention of Jesus of Nazareth:

To the other accusations of Donin, that the Talmud terms the followers of Jesus Christ "Minim" (infidels), that it condemns Jesus, that it allows ill-usage of people of other nationalities, etc., he [Rabbi Jechial] replied: "In the Talmud there is no mention of Jesus (Jesu) Christ, but only of another Jesus (Jeshua) who was a disciple of R. Joshua b. Prachia, who lived two hundred years before Christ."

— Rabbi Rodkinson

In a footnote, Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman promotes scholar Rev. Dr. Herford's view that the "harlot" is a reference to Mary, mother of Jesus.

Herford, Christianity in the Talmud, p. 48, suggests that Balaam is frequently used in the Talmud as a type for Jesus … Though no name is mentioned to shew which woman is meant, the mother of Jesus may be alluded to, which theory is strengthened by the statement that she mated with a carpenter.

http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/censorship_2.html

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, Pagan Romans wanted to hijack the apostles teachings and institutionalize it, as "The Way" following way quite revolutionary in it's understanding of law and love. Before they institutionalized it, they murdered plenty of "The Way" followers.

Then the Jesuits came along and corrupted Catholicism a lot further with their neo-platonism etc...

LaRouche says that... Reach Christopher Hollis books on the Jesuits. Again, there were two orders opposed to each other who took the name of the Jesuits. Both were corrupt. Today, the US is new Rome and the synagogue of Satan and Noahide Freemasons are at the helm.

I honestly don't get why so much people place so much value in the Christian and Jewish holy books.

Because Christianity is what PAGANS called persons who followed Yeshua. Again, read Yeshua's words ONLY, clearly the old covanant is over and the new covanent of preaching "The Way" and following Christ is the creators doing. Yeshua said to turn the other cheek.

Because Yeshua's words are the truth, period.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Provide the comment/source... thanks. Until then, you're putting words in my mouth.