you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]the-ham-bummer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Negro-loving catholicism as a concept does not make sense. Christian is raceless, Matthew 12:50 AND does NOT excuse you for your initial lack of privilege, Matthew 25:28, in fact if I ever seen an anti equality sentence it's that one. (Of course some clever guys are using that sentence as a free pass to exploit others, which is obviously a double abuse, of the context and of other praecepts). Bergoglio doesn't conform to catholicism nor christianity but this is a different problem isn't it.

As for the movement being genuine, it is not implied otherwise. A movement is made by its participants. They just need to be wary of their leaders, as ANYBODY else should.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

raceless

And that is what sucks about it. It stands on the principle of "equality". That is, in a sense, negro loving.

[–]the-ham-bummer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You are dismissing what I cited, which is a counterexample of what you say. So there is no discussion going on, anyway, equality is a masonic revolutionary principle that has nothing to do with religion, in fact it is anti-religious. Why? because the divine can be perfectly just, and that means giving everybody what they deserve. Which for simple statistical reason will NEVER match equality. Equality is MAN's way to TRY to be just when you don't have enough data. Dunno how much one deserves, so I give everybody an equal slice. As for who deserves what, it's for you to guess and for the hypothetical god to correct.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

cited

What did you cite, two bible verses? And no I'm not talking about that "masonic revolutionary" equality. I'm talking about the racelessness. A religion needs a representative. Nothing is greater than race. A religion that would, in my opinion, conform to my standards would be that which promotes metaphysical race realism. The 'raceless' thing about christianity is what makes it difficult to accept for true nationalists. On the other hand, many of us, including me don't like pagan religions because they're too cult-like. Due to that most of us are left with no religion. There needs to be a branch of Christianity focused on race, like the Positive Christianity movement. Problem is, the only religion that mirrors the beliefs of positive christianity is Creativity, and its really fucking hard to gain membership and insight into their beliefs.

[–]the-ham-bummer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Matthew 12:50 says Christian is who Christian does, so it's beyond race and also beyond hierarchy. It is not your favorite model, but I consider it very resilient, it allows me for instance to disobey the doctrinal acrobatics coming from Bergoglio. Moreover, the actual christian hierarchy is upside down, so Bergoglio should be servus servorum. He kinda fought that with the symbolic gesture of washing immigrant's feet instead of doing like Jesus who washed HIS DISCIPLES' but I am drifting OT.