"Can WHITE PEOPLE return the land they stole and pillaged from natives?" --- Twitter friend, who is a Jew; and then, "The land of Israel belongs to Jews as God intended, give it up already Palestinians."

submitted by Jesus from self.conspiracy

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]screwballeclipsed 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Only if the natives give it back to who they took it from?

[–]horatioherbert 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This question or revelation should deaden the pathetic narrative of their sick ideology

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Tell me who the natives took it from, please.

[–]screwballeclipsed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

well, the short answer is people which may have only been what now are thought of as indians, migrated from siberia through alaska. but there is evidence of stone age tools from europeans in the americas too. so natives took it from europeans ans russians.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Dude, lmao. It's not that you aren't speaking some truth, but they were red people coming down through siberia/alaska, not white folk and although I don't readily dismiss the evidence of european people groups landing on the east coast long before it was accepted, I do not see in any way shape or form how you can think that amounts to a European society in america that was wiped out by red people. That's basically what you are saying, but there isn't any hardcore evidence that proves or even gets close to proving what you are asserting. I'm willing to read anything you may have to send on the subject.

[–]screwballeclipsed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Obviously I don't know the answer. I really don't have enough time or interest to research the subject. One thing to consider, and I haven't seen many arguments on the issue in my few years here is that should the whole world leave a whole continent alone because a stone age people live there?

I'm getting way off the subject, but most of the continents are rich in resources. Why was n and s America colonized maybe n more than s, but Africa was mostly left alone. I think the tribes, probly most of them, we're more civil than African tribes.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There seems to be too many typos for me to understand. I would love to be able to properly respond to this!

[–]screwballeclipsed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

second paragraph:

I'm getting way off the subject, but with most continents on this planet are rich in resources. Why was north and south America colonized maybe north more than south, but Africa(colonial days) was mostly left alone. I think the (american indian)tribes, probly most of them, we're more civil than African tribes. so why did european colonize the americas more than africa. from what i can remember there were expeditions around africa, but many more settles in the americas. thank you for your answer.