you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Before I do that I would like you to pick up your bible.

Try to read your verses in the context. Lamentations 4:8
"7 Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire:"
Almost sounds like the nazarites were Western Europeans. White and red? Like this ?
"8 Their visage is blacker than a coal; they are not known in the streets: their skin cleaveth to their bones; it is withered, it is become like a stick."
If you read it in context, black symbolizes that their faces were unknown to anyone. The rest describe black as a cause of sin or famine or death, not their actual skin color. This is just extremely far reaching and if the rest of your examples are just as bad, it's not very convincing.

If egyptians aren't black, why are there more ancient jews that existed in India before white jews came?

Its unclear if black here refers to what we call blacks today. For instance: Black tartars were wild tartars, not actual black tartars.

why do they say the prophet daniel had wooly hair Imgur

He didn't? He is describing god in a dream of his. You're not reading the context. Wooly hair could also refer to the hair of greeks, anatolians or circassians like this or this

Start reading context instead of cherry-picking verses that you don't even understand. The worst one was when you cherry picked a verse that not only didn't describe the nazarites as black but as pure as snow and whiter than milk lol.

why do virtually all tomb escavations in egypt depict black people

They don't but the sudanese were enemies of Egypt and served as dick washers:
https://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/aDzXPqd_460s.jpg Egyptians also destroyed the black savage nubians:
https://www.realmofhistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Sudan_Tomb_Cultural_Entanglement_Egyptians_Nubians_1.jpg

these depictions of egyptian blacks are pretty much everywhere however this information cannot come to light for white jews want to be the chosen ones and they hide this information from us. The israelites were MISTAKEN for egyptians? if the original egyptians are black, this shows you something.

They weren't black. Its in Egypt; they were tanned.

herodotus the famous greek historian calls the egyptians people from ethiopia, black

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Aethiopians

I know this is not something that you want to hear, and possibly you have your own evidence on the contrary. But the more I research, the more I find that the original Hebrews as told my scripture and shown by archaeological evidence, are black, wooly hair, dark. Not sons of Japhot, but sons of Shem and Ham.

http://esau.today/100-reasons-israelites-are-white/

[–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire:" Almost sounds like the nazarites were Western Europeans

Nazarites doesn't mean much, thats a specific caste.

Their visage is blacker than a coal

You realize visage is a certain look, expression, demeanor?

Its unclear if black here refers to what we call blacks today. For instance: Black tartars were wild tartars, not actual black tartars.

True a lot of this is uncertain "skin color" wise

He didn't? He is describing god in a dream of his. You're not reading the context. Wooly hair could also refer to the hair of greeks, anatolians or circassians

Good point.

They don't but the sudanese were enemies of Egypt and served as dick washers:

Lol you argument is one picture(that has no source or verification, location, etc, just spread on 4chan) darker slaves than their also dark/african looking masters washing/circumcising their dicks? Slaves were generally always considered darker than their masters as they spent more time in the sun. This is just basics here. Regardless the color of those people in that picture is normal and darker than many africans today. There are plenty of africans that are very light but with lots of melanin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Aethiopians

Just shows my point at how diverse Africa was...

http://esau.today/100-reasons-israelites-are-white/

Is this website seriously your argument. They take https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Adamite theories seriously. Such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Winchell and we need to know that black white or whatever, a large many of humans from the period of 1800+ were retarded as fuck seriously. Read "the secret destiny of america" by Manly P. Hall the 33rd degree freemason and you will see that these people without our breadth of knowledge, technology, limitations with books they could read, were pretty damn stupid. Their prose is as good as ours randomly typing on a forum without even proof reading.

Sigh, I will say there is a lot of conflicting words in the bible. But I am not a dispensationalist, so I don't consider KJV bible the "exact words of god" Additionally that website makes weird claims like only europe had churches, and since Paul wrote to europeans therefore white people are israelites, etc. However things like this page: http://esau.today/i-wouldnt-want-to-be-anti-semetic/ definitely have some value and truth to it.

At the end of the day, are Egyptians not the people of Ham? Were the israelites not mistaken for egyptians? I don't see how one passage by lamentations about a specific type of person means all jews are white?

Its unfortunate that me as an "anti-semite" (aka against what jews have done, besides just financial control and degeneracy, including enslaving blacks) I am stuck between extremes like this.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nazarites doesn't mean much, thats a specific caste.

It's your verse. Why did you choose the verse about Nazarites if they don't mean much?

You realize visage is a certain look, expression, demeanor?

Yes, but it's clear from the context that they weren't black. It meant that they were unknown in the streets. Black faces. Unknown.

I don't see how one passage by lamentations about a specific type of person means all jews are white?

Israelites are not jews. Jews are from Judah, not Israel.
https://www.bible-history.com/biblemaps/wp-content/uploads/51-israel-and-judah-kings-color.png

[–]Anatolia 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's your verse. Why did you choose the verse about Nazarites if they don't mean much?

Well said.

Israelites are not jews. Jews are from Judah, not Israel.

I see. Well thank you for giving me things to look at! I think that many sides are guilty of cherry picking the bible. I recommend listening to the song "lifting the veil" by K-Rino. I would be curious of what you think of it, it discusses the many variations of the bible. I think you will agree with many parts (and disagree with others) I have trouble determining which scriptures are edited, to be trusted. Truly, it all comes from an ancient oral history that to some extent predates egypt/babylon/etc. etc. We act like gilgamesh for example is an older story than Noah, just because we have an older written document of it, but many of these afro-asiatic languages like Hebrew weren't put into writing for quite a long time. It's probable these stories are much older. I tend towards a spiritual examination from a buddhist perspective (not hindu which is paganism, christians tend to mix this up, buddhism is monotheist. I compare judaism to christianity as hinduism is to buddhism) and I find it 99% compatible with the spiritual teachings of Jesus, who I also follow. However, the buddhist perspective I don't think does justice to the spiritual war we find ourselves in that finds itself in the material. Thus, I commend the Jesus stance of establishing a "kingdom of God" and rejecting secular or any other forms of control where "God" is the "God-vernment" which is traditional to many societies from China to Egypt. I believe Jesus was speaking out against the law of Man being the "rule" here, rather than serving God.

Have a blessed day brother

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, everyone is guilty of cherry picking the bible. I only replied initially to make you reconsider that the israelites were blacks which most likely wasn't the case (from my understanding).
The bible was initially written in greek and much later translated into hebrew.
An example being "Adam" made from the 4 corners of the earth, A d a m being the first letters in east, west, north, south in Greek.
Ἀνατολὴ (the East), Δύσις (the West), Ἄρκτος (the North), and Μεσημβρία (the South)

Blessed day to you too