you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Ugh.

me being bored isn't proof that I'm a shill.

It's not proof, but it's obvious that you are. Most people aren't aware of the vaccination/pharma bribery, so they're never dismissive. Ever.

WHERE THE RESEARCHERS incentivized doctors with cash rewards to RESEARCH the efficacy of such a system is not proof that it actually happens in the real world. It's not proof that big pharma is actively bribing doctors. It's not proof of anything other than a researcher researched it.

It is 100% proof that the bribery is so widespread that the NIH is investigating the impact of it, and publishing the results on their own website. The bribery is a an endemic fact of the industry. It is incontrovertible proof that the system is completely corrupted.

[–]maga_espada 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The NIH didn't investigate anything. You don't even understand the basic mechanism of this shit that you try to use as proof of your absurd claims. Fuck.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You don't even understand the basic mechanism of this shit

I know that the research was apparently good enough for the NIH to publish it on the NIH.gov website.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1508536/

[–]maga_espada 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

NIH isn't a publisher....jfc.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You got rekd.