you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You don't trust the NIH?

Don't they supposedly "govern" the CDC (spoiler: the CDC is a privately owned institution).

Also, you responded to that almost instantly (within 3 minutes). You must have an agenda, because you clearly didn't have time to read the article.

Are you a Vaccine Industry Shill-Bot?

[–]maga_espada 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Ugh.

This has nothing to do with trusting the NIH.

A single RESEARCH study WHERE THE RESEARCHERS incentivized doctors with cash rewards to RESEARCH the efficacy of such a system is not proof that it actually happens in the real world. It's not proof that big pharma is actively bribing doctors. It's not proof of anything other than a researcher researched it.

It also wasn't an NIH study, finding, or recommendation. So it has nothing to do with trusting them. Because they also aren't saying bribery exists.

And lastly, me being bored isn't proof that I'm a shill. You stupid ass, responding in 5 minutes ALMOST INSTANTLY, yogurt head.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Ugh.

me being bored isn't proof that I'm a shill.

It's not proof, but it's obvious that you are. Most people aren't aware of the vaccination/pharma bribery, so they're never dismissive. Ever.

WHERE THE RESEARCHERS incentivized doctors with cash rewards to RESEARCH the efficacy of such a system is not proof that it actually happens in the real world. It's not proof that big pharma is actively bribing doctors. It's not proof of anything other than a researcher researched it.

It is 100% proof that the bribery is so widespread that the NIH is investigating the impact of it, and publishing the results on their own website. The bribery is a an endemic fact of the industry. It is incontrovertible proof that the system is completely corrupted.

[–]maga_espada 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The NIH didn't investigate anything. You don't even understand the basic mechanism of this shit that you try to use as proof of your absurd claims. Fuck.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You don't even understand the basic mechanism of this shit

I know that the research was apparently good enough for the NIH to publish it on the NIH.gov website.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1508536/

[–]maga_espada 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

NIH isn't a publisher....jfc.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You got rekd.