Literally Thousands of Doctors and Scientists Have Come Out Against Fauci's Lockdowns Including a Nobel Prize-Winning Biophysicist. The Media Just Doesn't Want You to Know

submitted by christnmusicreleases from redstate.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]maga_espada 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (63 children)

They'd need 9,400 more names before they got to 1% of physicians.... It's nonsense.

[–]christnmusicreleases[S] 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (29 children)

You're not reading the article, obviously.

[–]maga_espada 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (28 children)

I read it. There's nothing in it that says a significant number of physicians disagree with Fauci or national guidelines.

[–]christnmusicreleases[S] 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (27 children)

No, you didn't.

[–]maga_espada 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (26 children)

Is this what qualifies as a debate on this shitty website? You just plug your ears and tell anyone that disagrees with this stupid argument that they didn't read the stupid article?

Great.

[–]christnmusicreleases[S] 11 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 7 fun -  (24 children)

Feel free to leave. Don't let the toilet flush your ass down the drain on your way out.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Nah he's right you took an L here. I understand wanting to say corona is a hoax because the lockdown hurts the economy. But the real conspiracy here is china sent it out on purpose to destabalize us.

[–]DieCommieBreederScum 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

"Conspiracy" is a gaslighting buzzword used to maintain an abusive status quo.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you might be right about conspiracy theory, cia made that up, but conspiracies are things that can and have been happening for millenia

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

China had it's own hoax, and the main symptom was a dry cough.

Fundamentally different from the "respirator" emergency PsyOp that occurred here.

The Coco flu was hoax created by the NWO. Event 201 is the most obvious clue for that.
This event was held in NYC on Oct 18, 2019, and a Corona virus was used for the the plandemic drill.

A Chinese operation wouldn't have been able to shut down all of the world's major economies, literally within days off each other.

The world economies all acted "in lock step"; per the Rockefeller institute's 2010 planning documents.

This is a NWO global coup. China is a small part of it.

[–]maga_espada 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Thanks for your permission. I know it would be easier if you drive out all dissent and built a new echo chamber of "free speech" but I'd rather stick around a while and point out the utter bullshit.

[–]christnmusicreleases[S] 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (11 children)

Please, take off, Shareblue or whatever astroturding firm or propaganda department you represent.

[–]maga_espada 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Anybody that disagrees with your bullshit is a paid shill. "Free speech!" they cry.

[–]drbob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

THIS IS THE PROBLEM WITH FORUMS... BITCHES LIKE THIS MAGA_ESPADA...

HE IS A PAID SHILL FROM REDDIT.

[–]christnmusicreleases[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Freeze Peach

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

How about you actually disagree by countering with something substantial instead of just your pedantic opinion.

[–]TokLwdSaNthg 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

M: Yes, but I came here for an argument!!

A: OH! Oh! I'm sorry! This is abuse!

M: Oh! Oh I see!

A: Aha! No, you want room 12A, next door.

M: Oh...Sorry...

A: Not at all!

M: Stupid git

[–]dong_master 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Sorry dude you're wrong here. Learning to admit defeat is a great trait to have as an adult.

[–]christnmusicreleases[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Nope, you're clearly in the wrong. Bye!

[–]dong_master 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Just banned you for being wrong

[–]christnmusicreleases[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Sorry, wrong website. Try Red Dit, Dong Master.

[–]TokLwdSaNthg 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

“We don’t like censorship- we shout you down and tell you to go away”

[–]drbob 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

They'd need 9,400 more names before they got to 1% of physicians.... It's nonsense.

this is evidence that they want the covid lockdown.

the covid lockdown is intended to fully bankrupt you.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the covid lockdown is intended to fully bankrupt you.

Exactly. This is the great economic reset.

[–]TruthTeller 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Both the post and the article linked claim "Literally Thousands." The letter in question only shows 490 signatures. You are right, they have a long, long way to go. But funny how people here are just banging on you for bringing up the simplest observation that questions this bullshit claim of "Literally Thousands of Doctors and Scientists Have Come Out Against Fauci's Lockdowns..."

And as far as using the weight of the "Nobel Prize-Winning Biophysicist" Well that is Stanford University biophysicist Michael Levitt, a British American Israeli who won the 2013 Nobel Prize in chemistry. Get it? Chemistry? Here's what the NY Post has to say about him "The 73-year-old has no background as an epidemiologist.."

This is bullshit politics not science.

I'm out of here. So much for any debate on saidit.

[–]EuropeanAwakening 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

You're angry that people are allowed to have opinions that you disagree with. You're not angry about the correctness or incorrectness of the assertion. You want to control all platforms because your shitty ideas die without that.

[–]TruthTeller 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Quite the opposite: I am angry exactly because of the incorrectness of the assertion. There's a huge difference between opinions and lies. And these are lies.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you can have opinions but don't lie in the title of a post, makes for a bad look

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

Physicians don't use critical thinking anymore.

They are buried in debt, and get their "health care solutions" from pharmaceutical reps, who bribe them with bonuses; particularly lucrative vaccine bribes.

They've been reduced to technician employees.

The hospitals are empty. Hospital staff are often furloughed, or work reduced hours.

The pandemic is a hoax.

[–]maga_espada 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

Lol. Yeah, those vaccine bribes.

Get off Facebook, gramps.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

Lol. Yeah, those vaccine bribes.

Get off Facebook, gramps.

You are uninformed.

Here's a study 1999 article from the NIH.

The impact of physician bonuses, enhanced fees, and feedback on childhood immunization coverage rates.

PMCID: PMC1508536 doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.2.171

CONCLUSIONS: Bonuses sharply and rapidly increased immunization cover-age in medical records.

There can be no doubt that this bribery has gotten much worse in the last 21 years.

[–]maga_espada 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

Lol of course you think that study is proof of vaccine related bribery. Jfc.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

You don't trust the NIH?

Don't they supposedly "govern" the CDC (spoiler: the CDC is a privately owned institution).

Also, you responded to that almost instantly (within 3 minutes). You must have an agenda, because you clearly didn't have time to read the article.

Are you a Vaccine Industry Shill-Bot?

[–]maga_espada 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

Ugh.

This has nothing to do with trusting the NIH.

A single RESEARCH study WHERE THE RESEARCHERS incentivized doctors with cash rewards to RESEARCH the efficacy of such a system is not proof that it actually happens in the real world. It's not proof that big pharma is actively bribing doctors. It's not proof of anything other than a researcher researched it.

It also wasn't an NIH study, finding, or recommendation. So it has nothing to do with trusting them. Because they also aren't saying bribery exists.

And lastly, me being bored isn't proof that I'm a shill. You stupid ass, responding in 5 minutes ALMOST INSTANTLY, yogurt head.

[–]Zahn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

Pharma routinely provides incentives to doctors to promote their products. It's tellingly naive if you think otherwise.

[–]maga_espada 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Please provide a single source for pharma bribing doctors to prescribe vaccines.

"You're naive if you don't agree with me" is not an argument.

[–]Zahn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

By naive, it doesn't seem like you know how the world works. Is it due to age or willful ignorance?

https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(04)00293-4/fulltext

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749379797000287

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Ugh.

me being bored isn't proof that I'm a shill.

It's not proof, but it's obvious that you are. Most people aren't aware of the vaccination/pharma bribery, so they're never dismissive. Ever.

WHERE THE RESEARCHERS incentivized doctors with cash rewards to RESEARCH the efficacy of such a system is not proof that it actually happens in the real world. It's not proof that big pharma is actively bribing doctors. It's not proof of anything other than a researcher researched it.

It is 100% proof that the bribery is so widespread that the NIH is investigating the impact of it, and publishing the results on their own website. The bribery is a an endemic fact of the industry. It is incontrovertible proof that the system is completely corrupted.

[–]maga_espada 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The NIH didn't investigate anything. You don't even understand the basic mechanism of this shit that you try to use as proof of your absurd claims. Fuck.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You don't even understand the basic mechanism of this shit

I know that the research was apparently good enough for the NIH to publish it on the NIH.gov website.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1508536/