you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Questions to ponder:

Are the tests accurate?

Do the tests cross-react?

Have we seen COVID-19 u der a microscope?

Have we cultured it?

Are they messing with the statistics?

The latter questions seems to be an obvious yes. They are listing anyone who dies and who teated positive woth COVID but had zero symptoms as a COVID death. If millions have COVID, and older people are dying from other complications it wouldn't be hard to fake the death numbers.

[–]72ndGender 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Cause of death determinations are usually just opinions, so when a coroner or ME is being pressured (or forced) to label any death with Covid on board, as a covid death, it's very easy to pump the stats up. And like you mentioned, old people are constantly dying from other complications, so obviously we will have a lot of old people to label as covid deaths.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It seems, however, the CDC and HIH are very happy with fraudulently bumping up the case numbers for specific viruses but disregard bacterial, spirochetal cases such as Borreliosis.

Not a lot of money to be had in terrible persistent spirochetal infections that cannot be curtailed with a vaccine due to antigenic variation although they tried to pass one off by falsifying the case def. of Botreliosis and rasiong the anti-body cut off standard to test the efficacy of a fake vaccine.

Remmeber, for bacterial infections and even Viruses, many times the sicker you are, the less positive you'll be on an antibody test due to anergy and an immunocompromised system.