you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 17 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

Theft under the guise of “aid” and meanwhile Americans suffer

Zionist-owned congress. Thanks freemasonry!

[–]Jesus 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Infiltrated Freemasonry. Although, Jackson the Freemason would make a good Zionist if he lived today concerning some of his views on indigenous peoples right to land, that is excluding his whole "kill the banks and get rid of permanent public debt" belief which he won the people over.

[–]magnora7 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Infiltrated Freemasonry.

Lol as if there's any other type. Freemasrony didn't matter until the Rotshchilds pumped it full of money to help promote Zionism starting it the 1830s. They bailed out the British crown, who became in debt to them. The biggest Freemason lodge is in London. The rest is history.

Jackson killing the banks was probably simply one faction of freemasonry fighting another faction. But I think those types of inter-freemasonry disputes were basically resolved for the most part by 1913 or so, when the Federal Reserve was created, and also the land of Israel was granted to the Zionists and the Rotschilds by the British Crown as per the Balfour Declaration. Once those pieces fell in to place, it's hard to see any inter-freemasrony disputes of any real magnitude.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There are Lodges that directly oppose each other. Continental lodges/revolutionary lodges have openly attacked British lodges.

However, on Jackson, you might be right, though he cared deeply about the freedom and liberty of the people he fought against the British banks tooth and nail and wanted the country indebted to nobody, eapeically not a corporate entity given free reign by an infiltrated congress. There were plenty of assassination attempts on him, and yet, Jackson has a statue in a Rothschild museum and Rothschild has thanked him for his endevours, not personally but after his death.

Why? Not because he was a willful proponent of Rothschild, far from it, but because the Frankfurt banks were in competition with the British banks on who would own the US. Jackson fought the British banks at that time which were in power in the US. They would later burn down the treasury. Jackson's endevour indirectly gave Rothschild time to perfect their plan.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Jackson has a statue in a Rothschild museum and Rothschild has thanked him for his endevours, not personally but after his death.

Yeah and they put him on the $20 Federal Reserve note as well. It's all to spit in his face and re-write history, I would guess.

but because the Frankfurt banks were in competition with the British banks on who would own the US. Jackson fought the British banks at that time which were in power in the US. They would later burn down the treasury. Jackson's endevour indirectly gave Rothschild time to perfect their plan.

Very interesting, I did not know that bit of history. Thank you!

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, they also put in God We Trust on the credit paper as well. But if your mind is on money and nothing else then it is your God. Jackson would never have wanted a debt (bonds) backed currency ; never in a million years. He and William Gouge were the proponents of indepedent Treasuries and saving post office.

Remember too, the FED bill was not the start of central banking it was only a reorganization. Since, the revolution and even before bankinmg families would try to capture the US and bring it under control via debt.

Names such as Belmont, Hamilton, Stevens, Seligman, Loeb, Schiff, Rothschild, Warburg, Lehman and others. They all were foreign to the US.